From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0718C433E1 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 13:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819EE2245C for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 13:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.b="ZE71Wycl" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728159AbgHBNOW (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Aug 2020 09:14:22 -0400 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:39497 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728043AbgHBNOV (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Aug 2020 09:14:21 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BKM0z2dLrz9sSG; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 23:14:11 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1596374059; bh=l8Vv313rJGqlK2PcaNCVrGcU8SJlDczW2rNrY770DTs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ZE71Wyclmt4MQrTZPs6iY6nA2eek+wB/iYUyHxx7nWlyJbBID58C0vJfORjrDD43E wNND8mtfpDbimWptgmYv4VddxYAmX0rHolg1XVT+G8s2w1bA+8uHwFHNUayBhafmGn U3RDd9O7hEfPsfEFxg1WUJgbZZ35QUi0zip6yzBRdj0KvzX0aIma+XejtIevU686ru HM91WecXmsJTqK1azOcV4OJmJvhTYVRaSfqOgAvj1ip20Yb1FPEAys0j9IKpP3z8BI XGg3VJKFsWHrW1MkBYjbjQi72gF9zJZpWvDX1DLzzpzZpzoVYn1bqH1kWqIhbU7xhV gtswbHEE4eTGQ== From: Michael Ellerman To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Borislav Petkov , Catalin Marinas , Christoph Hellwig , Dave Hansen , Ingo Molnar , Marek Szyprowski , Max Filippov , Michal Simek , Mike Rapoport , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Mackerras , Paul Walmsley , Peter Zijlstra , Russell King , Stafford Horne , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , Yoshinori Sato , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp, x86@kernel.org, Hari Bathini Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] powerpc: fadamp: simplify fadump_reserve_crash_area() In-Reply-To: <20200801101854.GD534153@kernel.org> References: <20200728051153.1590-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20200728051153.1590-7-rppt@kernel.org> <87d04d5hda.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <20200801101854.GD534153@kernel.org> Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 23:14:10 +1000 Message-ID: <87o8nt197h.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Mike Rapoport writes: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:15:13PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Mike Rapoport writes: >> > From: Mike Rapoport >> > >> > fadump_reserve_crash_area() reserves memory from a specified base address >> > till the end of the RAM. >> > >> > Replace iteration through the memblock.memory with a single call to >> > memblock_reserve() with appropriate that will take care of proper memory >> ^ >> parameters? >> > reservation. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport >> > --- >> > arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 20 +------------------- >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-) >> >> I think this looks OK to me, but I don't have a setup to test it easily. >> I've added Hari to Cc who might be able to. >> >> But I'll give you an ack in the hope that it works :) > > Actually, I did some digging in the git log and the traversal was added > there on purpose by the commit b71a693d3db3 ("powerpc/fadump: exclude > memory holes while reserving memory in second kernel") > Presuming this is still reqruired I'm going to drop this patch and will > simply replace for_each_memblock() with for_each_mem_range() in v2. Thanks. cheers