From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56966 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23993889AbeK3WL1jMAlP (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2018 23:11:27 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/15] MIPS: replace **** with a hug References: <20181130192737.15053-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20181130192737.15053-2-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20181130195758.GA20328@linux.intel.com> <9ba4d08d-10d1-c233-476a-c73051b8c9f5@suse.com> <20181130215003.GH23772@linux.intel.com> From: Nikolay Borisov Message-ID: <9f669daa-e6eb-0455-9842-c540f71df4e0@suse.com> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2018 00:11:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181130215003.GH23772@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-Path: Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: To: Jarkko Sakkinen , Nikolay Borisov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , Paul Burton , James Hogan , Joshua Kinard , "open list:MIPS" On 30.11.18 г. 23:50 ч., Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:06:30PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >> I find it quite ridiculous that grown up people are engaging at yet >> another coc-related conversation and are on the way to blowing it out of >> proportions. Let's focus on improving the ACTUAL code what's the point >> to bikeshed on the word? >> >> I've seen people before me comment that some comments are plainly out of >> date and that warrants their removal but otherwise nitpicking things >> like that. It seems common sense is very scant these days... > > I have absolutely nothing against CoC. I didn't mean you are against the CoC, I meant it's ridiculous to follow it so closely. And regarding 'fuck', I believe this is rather pertinent as to why this patchset is unnecessary: https://ia801406.us.archive.org/30/items/JackWagnerattr.MontyPythontheWordFuck/The_Word_Fuck.ogg > > If you look up from LKML, there total zero posts from criticizing of > having such. OK, maybe I find it bit too high-level, and yeah, this > patch set has been useful to know where the line is. I can go through > the commits and think more appropriate alternatives (thus the RFC-tag). > > Thanks. > > /Jarkko >