From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C3CC43603 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 18:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3F22054F for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 18:48:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1575917313; bh=muHKCaD7T6fXbAMddnaVXcC0vtPeCxDhcuEyWi76OQU=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=VmPtx//j8c0ZH98N2OMEFeo6R6OUgJS5gjmSwesbiBqYwK/Vw7gsLLl2IZWhsQXNp OSvd7yo3ZnhzRIykKB+j7ADJozsWbnsHRzQ1K8T75u/9AY8iuMExb722uReDLJ8fda oRBduuLRf6w3YAKEmuavmeeYLtmTAYOB/MK9yp+I= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726408AbfLISsd (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 13:48:33 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f66.google.com ([209.85.166.66]:37697 "EHLO mail-io1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726335AbfLISsd (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 13:48:33 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f66.google.com with SMTP id k24so15907867ioc.4 for ; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 10:48:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Zi2mbcA3dI0Tp/DpO+thSwq2zZZGqpVehuHAqxL+i5c=; b=LGfA1Taelzd+PatnajvxDFPlsISUHMFnQWVwAolBrXJGwNVRpSKxeSHaFDTeMc/ptL hEulU4FMnI7+6PQRJEC6wn5Zz3/ecd+c9iUfpIoXAfZm1Oc+2xGPCXvHwUG6TQ5Zvy2t s5aLS7r1cbj7m0+O93Ae4OUPcSIPg/Nuy9b+Q= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Zi2mbcA3dI0Tp/DpO+thSwq2zZZGqpVehuHAqxL+i5c=; b=EqagL1lKWWl2aeLFTlZd6t6jxacci8cnev/lls33QV0509TAEmyiqKKg3o9JqGpYt/ iP+CjKTjSnENNY7qFYw3kyUS4YPkdqQPxqElp5aqusTVJDt4o9lIW4aC3XX+FcJW/PzD dCaee0mcb1tgNbHCgDOMBzjwg3IalNynLzCKZBCEguoHS8pD8oieJYQitn5Lhv7b7+9Y HgbuOd61TvraOeBfbBt8W99cLKTwaEo/sCXpmZfV4/FGOjlFLJQi9Tyx0Cx/hmVcVKMq Qnu+u040LudoCRqLn0LV3HvqQFFrPD56Ft+0cO0SpZEVjVa5c4fiPsDAcYRccJ7F7t29 wHYA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWYbXBb0KMVD94StgYiic2w/jLSX0iXxUIYBkREsrSgfgXJfVZa CJf4QkNrjvnJhfjwAZddIAi+FLKb8d1pWnWpamfqfg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqylpzBA/rEOG36qxdMJP/TXW5tXH1kkcXg24MQVyc8HWod7DLw4mYvfIqk4ydMjgej/CHEZBfcOnbDj+lKD+aE= X-Received: by 2002:a02:ce5c:: with SMTP id y28mr28638212jar.96.1575917312372; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 10:48:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191209135823.28465-1-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20191209135823.28465-1-hch@lst.de> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 10:48:20 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: kill off ioremap_nocache To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Paul Burton , James Hogan , Arnd Bergmann , linux-mips , linux-arch , lkml Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 5:58 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Let me know what you think and if this is something acceptable for > just after -rc1. How many conflicts will this result in generally? I like it, but I'd like to have some idea of whether it ends up being one of those "really painful churn" things? A couple of conflicts isn't an issue - they'll be trivial to fix. It's the "this causes fifty silly conflicts" that I worry about, partly because it then makes submaintainers inevitably do the wrong thing (ie "I foresee an excessive amount of 'git rebase' rants next release"). Also, it looks like Google doesn't want this to happen. This whole series was marked as spam for me.I'm not sure why, I don't see anything odd that would trigger it, and DKIM and SPF both passed. Maybe it's you, maybe it's Google, and maybe it's the infradead SRS thing. Linus