From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D43C43381 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 06:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0441120693 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 06:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="xX3/HJVi" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729400AbfCYGLQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 02:11:16 -0400 Received: from conssluserg-04.nifty.com ([210.131.2.83]:52602 "EHLO conssluserg-04.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729373AbfCYGLQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 02:11:16 -0400 Received: from mail-vk1-f173.google.com (mail-vk1-f173.google.com [209.85.221.173]) (authenticated) by conssluserg-04.nifty.com with ESMTP id x2P6B3ao022765; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:11:04 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-04.nifty.com x2P6B3ao022765 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1553494264; bh=M5yB2IL6rUVfb6KdDylKlG225AGtoW93SAI13OU0scI=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=xX3/HJVi67ZE7O+YgUqY300T00eUjNmJmXP8bCXfoQHa5Air4JM6GFt/6oBaczpj/ u11TINIB7G2truNMRO5GcWSbfQSL1zf1IeAED2pmVCAzEPfwkett3y4nd6iZ8G0rHD gDwKNHBAnpvcqHz+cUlBgFdd2Dt3ZqYf/800h8o4bipHysPCxBBgReoo84esXAs2tE v3YifwN1shxb3mR95hOrNLP5oiGOjTO08WNyZOUo6iwL49DbeCPGekShiCb62o+ahl JdPg0gXqHCc2MEe1FgcA9Dnz0Zr7qfil5TTERII2lmrZR2L0Qb27qhVxDYEF1d632b o0O0IBkTWJ30Q== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.221.173] Received: by mail-vk1-f173.google.com with SMTP id s80so677281vke.6; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 23:11:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXATT4kBG7iBUkl0BTlawGZZctYVCOITH7RSX3A5RJqwxVlWKy/ e3GNVKgfzb9Pc5xuXP9ZGjeYVvxUBkvNOWfPHTM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz8qUhdfpRv8vBpRrajP0ICg/lHdRAAg6gG/ToNJOJ/LPtsBzM8huHn1TCODJl7fUVHytYK1YSBZrnQ8QJK2r0= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9350:: with SMTP id v77mr13352129vkd.84.1553494263012; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 23:11:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1553062828-27798-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> In-Reply-To: From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:10:27 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] compiler: allow all arches to enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arch , linux-s390 , Dave Hansen , Michael Ellerman , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Burton , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:34 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:41 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > I've added your patch to my randconfig test setup and will let you > > know if I see anything noticeable. I'm currently testing clang-arm32, > > clang-arm64 and gcc-x86. > > This is the only additional bug that has come up so far: > > `.exit.text' referenced in section `.alt.smp.init' of > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.o: defined in discarded section > `exit.text' of drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.o > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h b/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h > index 201100226301..84b12e33104d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ void convert_to_tag_list(struct tag *tags); > const struct machine_desc *setup_machine_tags(phys_addr_t __atags_pointer, > unsigned int machine_nr); > #else > -static inline const struct machine_desc * > +static __always_inline const struct machine_desc * > setup_machine_tags(phys_addr_t __atags_pointer, unsigned int machine_nr) > { > early_print("no ATAGS support: can't continue\n"); > I do not know why to reproduce it, but is "__init __noreturn" more sensible than "__always_inline" here? -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada