From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14E14179AB; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712864734; cv=none; b=eMYMe8p8esrOaDfeQjvfasmmELdh2rw3euMQiVNqdNwWNvCa/I7E8K5pMAf3uDTVwxtwi7fBETM9Uju/VEfGeVAH4Keob9TkcTmcH3Y1Lf8XdMqXM5EhkDlD+/Nei12RjMF2Um7BOmH6uVZyD2P6df03AZncTXICx0VEN5Nj2ik= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712864734; c=relaxed/simple; bh=v/kg2zBgjouqNayyfTZ1gQRpaCtsWdHXcAeRYRi8jSc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=c/C0StsHFU9gn6cbnUAiuarWHeNJKZHzZh0nh5/YlN/wuYIJaD0LreWV64zvda5Cp6RcZNbWVKl7kdEATl7Y/cqTC8udR0Mh6ONJkAOQmyEnH3+1Jxv1UCPEqV1sWl+Ui4cxqwfwDmp1uUvG7UiYuWqrPIqlY6J9sYVRCwuaSko= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=LW4B+RA/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="LW4B+RA/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=mF3LgyonzoPiLPggKtlEjI/RAYj7UYB9rpei5Ud65w4=; b=LW4B+RA/mLBikoIkjpMDpYn9oP u2YAB5xmL1D4XkoUv1Ve9gQEIQ0TAvvtWmZldKRQqHURClp6PnA6zwtnlpDI5YcucnvadEV7WunWR b/1Iq8vVt1oArh5tcqicc9Z63IyQeyuWCw9WE0oR/Ok86B2YT082t2bjkyb27tRD8lbretuG1UYwR NEF+joRqo6rwX3adbENZeQaNQlnWdEzjPCwZa5i/q7E286YXArA3Jy82X/wR+QDg69SZaiPqn91EB VhUQK10NXrl7tuNE0LjnU4cJYOYOYsXm/2EOsZ/Hcy9WT5WMB3gVzJ0tiJjB3LXt+twOTdZqPWpdj bhUwFHXw==; Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rv0MS-0000000DwB9-3meA; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:45:28 +0000 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:45:28 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Mike Rapoport , Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Ghiti , Andrew Morton , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= , Catalin Marinas , Christophe Leroy , "David S. Miller" , Dinh Nguyen , Donald Dutile , Eric Chanudet , Heiko Carstens , Helge Deller , Huacai Chen , Kent Overstreet , Mark Rutland , Michael Ellerman , Nadav Amit , Palmer Dabbelt , Puranjay Mohan , Rick Edgecombe , Russell King , Song Liu , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Will Deacon , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator Message-ID: References: <20240411160051.2093261-1-rppt@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240411160051.2093261-1-rppt@kernel.org> Sender: Luis Chamberlain On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:00:36PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" > > Hi, > > Since v3 I looked into making execmem more of an utility toolbox, as we > discussed at LPC with Mark Rutland, but it was getting more hairier than > having a struct describing architecture constraints and a type identifying > the consumer of execmem. > > And I do think that having the description of architecture constraints for > allocations of executable memory in a single place is better that having it > spread all over the place. > > The patches available via git: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=execmem/v4 I've taken the first 5 patches through modules-next for now to get early exposure to testing. Of those I just had minor nit feedback on the 5th, but the rest look good. Let's wait for review for the rest of the patches 6-15. Luis