From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC835C73C6D for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CA520665 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726234AbfGJGM3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 02:12:29 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:46788 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725839AbfGJGM3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 02:12:29 -0400 Received: from pd9ef1cb8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.239.28.184] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hl5q2-0004k5-M0; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:12:22 +0200 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:12:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: John Stultz cc: Vincenzo Frascino , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel , lkml , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , Andre Przywara , Arnd Bergmann , Huw Davies , Catalin Marinas , Daniel Lezcano , Will Deacon , Russell King , Ralf Baechle , Mark Salyzyn , Paul Burton , Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>, Rasmus Villemoes , Shijith Thotton , Peter Collingbourne Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/25] arm64: compat: Add vDSO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20190621095252.32307-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> <20190621095252.32307-11-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 9 Jul 2019, John Stultz wrote: > Though unfortunately, it seems the arm64 vdso code that just landed is > breaking AOSP for me. > > I see a lot of the following errors: > 01-01 01:22:14.097 755 755 F libc : Fatal signal 11 (SIGSEGV), > code 1 (SEGV_MAPERR), fault addr 0x3cf2c96c in tid 755 (cameraserver), > pid 755 (cameraserver) > 01-01 01:22:14.112 759 759 F libc : Fatal signal 11 (SIGSEGV), > code 1 (SEGV_MAPERR), fault addr 0x3cf2c96c in tid 759 > (android.hardwar), pid 759 (android.hardwar) > 01-01 01:22:14.120 756 756 F libc : Fatal signal 11 (SIGSEGV), > code 1 (SEGV_MAPERR), fault addr 0x3cf2c96c in tid 756 (drmserver), > pid 756 (drmserver) > > Which go away if I revert the vdso merge that went in via tip/timers. > > I tried to bisect things down a bit, but as some later fixes are > required (at one point, date was returning the start epoch and never > increasing), this hasn't worked too well. But I'm guessing since I > see: "CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT not defined or empty, the compat vDSO will > not be built", and the system is half working, I'm guessing this is an > issue with just the 32bit code failing. While I can try to sort out > the proper CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT in my build environment, I assume > userland shouldn't be crashing if that value isn't set. The obvious question is whether the VDSO is mapped to the 32bit process in that case. It shouldn't... Thanks, tglx