On 8/16/20 11:14 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello!

Thank you for the review Sergei.

> On 15.08.2020 19:35, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> 
>> Add Cascoda CA8210 6LoWPAN controller to device tree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
>> ---
>>   arch/mips/boot/dts/img/pistachio_marduk.dts | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/img/pistachio_marduk.dts
>> b/arch/mips/boot/dts/img/pistachio_marduk.dts
>> index ea11a21b133b..633a41954cc0 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/img/pistachio_marduk.dts
>> +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/img/pistachio_marduk.dts
>> @@ -75,6 +75,28 @@
>>       VDD-supply = <&internal_dac_supply>;
>>   };
>>   +&spfi0 {
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +    pinctrl-0 = <&spim0_pins>, <&spim0_cs0_alt_pin>,
>> <&spim0_cs2_alt_pin>, <&spim0_cs3_alt_pin>, <&spim0_cs4_alt_pin>;
>> +    pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +
>> +    cs-gpios = <&gpio1 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>, <&gpio0 2
>> GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>,
>> +            <&gpio1 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>, <&gpio1 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> +
>> +    ca8210: ca8210@0 {
> 
>    The device nodes are supposed to have the generic names...

I am not referencing this, so I can also remove it:
	ca8210@0 {

Otherwise, would this be ok:
	ieee802154: ca8210@0 {

>> +        status = "okay";

This status = "okay"; can be removed.

>> +        compatible = "cascoda,ca8210";
>> +        reg = <0>;
>> +        spi-max-frequency = <4000000>;
> 
>    Only 4MHz?

The vendor device tree also use 4MHz:
https://github.com/CreatorDev/openwrt/blob/ci40/target/linux/pistachio/dts/pistachio/pistachio_marduk.dts#L34

The device tree binding says "Maximum clock speed, should be *less than*
4000000", it could even make sense to switch this to 3MHz.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ieee802154/ca8210.txt

I do not have the datasheet for the cascoda,ca8210.

>> +        spi-cpol;
>> +        reset-gpio = <&gpio0 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> +        irq-gpio = <&gpio2 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> +        extclock-enable;
>> +        extclock-freq = <16000000>;
>> +        extclock-gpio = <2>;
> 
>    Hm, strange spec for a GPIO prop, shouldn't they all be alike?

I am also getting this compile warning:
arch/mips/boot/dts/img/pistachio_marduk.dts:135.3-23: Warning
(gpios_property): /spi@18100f00/ca8210@0:extclock-gpio: cell 0 is not a
phandle reference

arch/mips/boot/dts/img/pistachio_marduk.dts:126.19-136.4: Warning
(gpios_property): /spi@18100f00/ca8210@0: Missing property '#gpio-cells'
in node /clk@18144000 or bad phandle (referred from extclock-gpio[0])

I do not know how to fix this.

The binding is defined here:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ieee802154/ca8210.txt

Hauke