Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250: Fix clearing FIFOs in RS485 mode again

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On 12/13/2018 01:41 AM, Paul Burton wrote:
> Hi Marek / Greg / all,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 12:44:52AM +0000, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> The 8250 FIFOs indeed need to be cleared after stopping transmission in
>> RS485 mode without SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX flag set. But there are two
>> problems with the approach taken by the previous patch from Fixes tag.
>>
>> First, serial8250_clear_fifos() should clear fifos, but what it really
>> does is it enables the FIFOs unconditionally if present, clears them
>> and then sets the FCR register to zero, which effectively disables the
>> FIFOs. In case the FIFO is disabled, enabling it and clearing it makes
>> no sense and in fact can trigger misbehavior of the 8250 core. Moreover,
>> the FCR register may contain other FIFO configuration bits which may not
>> be writable unconditionally and writing them incorrectly can trigger
>> misbehavior of the 8250 core too. (ie. AM335x UART swallows the first
>> byte and retransmits the last byte twice because of this FCR write).
>>
>> Second, serial8250_clear_and_reinit_fifos() completely reloads the FCR,
>> but what really has to happen at the end of the RS485 transmission is
>> clearing of the FIFOs and nothing else.
>>
>> This patch repairs serial8250_clear_fifos() so that it really only
>> clears the FIFOs by operating on FCR[2:1] bits and leaves all the
>> other bits alone. It also undoes serial8250_clear_and_reinit_fifos()
>> from __do_stop_tx_rs485() as serial8250_clear_fifos() is sufficient.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
>> Fixes: 2bed8a8e7072 ("Clearing FIFOs in RS485 emulation mode causes subsequent transmits to break")
>> Cc: Daniel Jedrychowski <avistel@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>> ---
>> NOTE: I am not entirely certain this won't break some other hardware,
>>       esp. since there might be dependencies on the weird previous
>>       behavior of the serial8250_clear_fifos() somewhere.
> 
> This patch has broken the UART on my Ingenic JZ4780 based MIPS Creator
> Ci20 board. After this patch the system seems to detect garbage input
> that is recognized as SysRq triggers which spam the console & eventually
> reset the system.
> 
> One thing of note is that both serial8250_do_startup() &
> serial8250_do_shutdown() contain comments that explicitly state their
> expectation that the FIFOs will be disabled by serial8250_clear_fifos(),
> which is no longer true after this patch.
> 
> I found that restoring the old behaviour for serial8250_do_startup() is
> enough to make my system work again, but this is obviously a hack:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
> index f776b3eafb96..8def02933d19 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
> @@ -2210,7 +2210,11 @@ int serial8250_do_startup(struct uart_port *port)
>  	 * Clear the FIFO buffers and disable them.
>  	 * (they will be reenabled in set_termios())
>  	 */
> -	serial8250_clear_fifos(up);
> +	if (up->capabilities & UART_CAP_FIFO) {
> +		serial_port_out(port, UART_FCR, UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO);
> +		serial8250_clear_fifos(up);
> +		serial_port_out(port, UART_FCR, 0);
> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Clear the interrupt registers.
> 
> Any ideas? Given the mismatch between this patch & comments that clearly
> expect the old behaviour I think the __do_stop_tx_rs485() case probably
> needs something different to other callers.

The problem the original patch fixed was that too many bits were cleared
in the FCR on OMAP3/AM335x . If you have such a system (a beaglebone or
similar), you can come up with a solution which can accommodate both the
JZ4780 and AM335x. Can you take a look ? The datasheet for both should
be public too.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut