On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 12:49 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 11:18 -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > > index e80aa9d2db68..334ce608735c 100644 > > --- a/mm/filemap.c > > +++ b/mm/filemap.c > > @@ -204,9 +204,9 @@ static void unaccount_page_cache_page(struct > > address_space *mapping, > > if (PageSwapBacked(page)) { > > __mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_SHMEM, -nr); > > if (PageTransHuge(page)) > > - __dec_node_page_state(page, NR_SHMEM_THPS); > > + __dec_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_SHMEM_THPS); > > } else if (PageTransHuge(page)) { > > - __dec_node_page_state(page, NR_FILE_THPS); > > + __dec_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_FILE_THPS); > > filemap_nr_thps_dec(mapping); > > } > > This may be a dumb question, but does that mean the > NR_FILE_THPS number will no longer be visible in > /proc/vmstat or is there some magic I overlooked in > a cursory look of the code? Never mind, I found it a few levels deep in __dec_lruvec_page_state. Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel -- All Rights Reversed.