linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@au1.ibm.com>, alastair@d-silva.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] memory_hotplug: Add a bounds check to __add_pages
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 11:49:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01def17b-1df8-a63a-4cfc-91e99614a2f0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191001004617.7536-2-alastair@au1.ibm.com>

On 01.10.19 02:46, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>
> 
> On PowerPC, the address ranges allocated to OpenCAPI LPC memory
> are allocated from firmware. These address ranges may be higher
> than what older kernels permit, as we increased the maximum
> permissable address in commit 4ffe713b7587
> ("powerpc/mm: Increase the max addressable memory to 2PB"). It is
> possible that the addressable range may change again in the
> future.
> 
> In this scenario, we end up with a bogus section returned from
> __section_nr (see the discussion on the thread "mm: Trigger bug on
> if a section is not found in __section_nr").
> 
> Adding a check here means that we fail early and have an
> opportunity to handle the error gracefully, rather than rumbling
> on and potentially accessing an incorrect section.
> 
> Further discussion is also on the thread ("powerpc: Perform a bounds
> check in arch_add_memory")
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190827052047.31547-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>
> ---
>  mm/memory_hotplug.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index c73f09913165..5af9f4466ad1 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -278,6 +278,22 @@ static int check_pfn_span(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int check_hotplug_memory_addressable(unsigned long pfn,
> +					    unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> +	const u64 max_addr = PFN_PHYS(pfn + nr_pages) - 1;
> +
> +	if (max_addr >> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) {
> +		const u64 max_allowed = (1ull << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS + 1)) - 1;
> +		WARN(1,
> +		     "Hotplugged memory exceeds maximum addressable address, range=%#llx-%#llx, maximum=%#llx\n",
> +		     (u64)PFN_PHYS(pfn), max_addr, max_allowed);
> +		return -E2BIG;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Reasonably generic function for adding memory.  It is
>   * expected that archs that support memory hotplug will
> @@ -291,6 +307,10 @@ int __ref __add_pages(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  	unsigned long nr, start_sec, end_sec;
>  	struct vmem_altmap *altmap = restrictions->altmap;
>  
> +	err = check_hotplug_memory_addressable(pfn, nr_pages);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
>  	if (altmap) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Validate altmap is within bounds of the total request
> 

I actually wanted to give my RB to v7, not v6 :)

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-01  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-01  0:46 [PATCH v7 0/1] Add bounds check for Hotplugged memory Alastair D'Silva
2019-10-01  0:46 ` [PATCH v7 1/1] memory_hotplug: Add a bounds check to __add_pages Alastair D'Silva
2019-10-01  9:49   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-10-02 22:14     ` Andrew Morton
2019-10-02 23:27       ` Alastair D'Silva
2019-10-04 12:08   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01def17b-1df8-a63a-4cfc-91e99614a2f0@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alastair@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=alastair@d-silva.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).