From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E56C54E8D for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4264420736 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:05:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4264420736 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B60EC900026; Mon, 11 May 2020 07:05:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B1193900006; Mon, 11 May 2020 07:05:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A280D900026; Mon, 11 May 2020 07:05:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0238.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.238]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B641900006 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 07:05:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C859181AEF00 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:05:27 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76804157094.02.plate09_126fabfcd582b X-HE-Tag: plate09_126fabfcd582b X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4459 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:05:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB16AC64; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] lib/test_sysctl: support testing of sysctl. boot parameter To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , Iurii Zaikin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Ivan Teterevkov , Michal Hocko , David Rientjes , Matthew Wilcox , "Eric W . Biederman" , "Guilherme G . Piccoli" , Alexey Dobriyan , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christian Brauner , Masami Hiramatsu References: <20200427180433.7029-1-vbabka@suse.cz> <20200427180433.7029-6-vbabka@suse.cz> <20200427183913.GH11244@42.do-not-panic.com> From: Vlastimil Babka Message-ID: <028d1996-9f4c-20c6-fb2a-706baa919dde@suse.cz> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 13:05:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200427183913.GH11244@42.do-not-panic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 4/27/20 8:39 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 08:04:33PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Nice, also we could just require > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/config b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/config > index 6ca14800d755..34461cc99a2b 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/config > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/config > @@ -1 +1,3 @@ > CONFIG_TEST_SYSCTL=y > +CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y > +CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC=y > > tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_lib.sh then has a kconfig_has() > which can verify the exact config. Hmm but it also has a (firmware area specific) fallback for case where IKCONFIG_PROC doesn't exist. So it's simpler to just keep checking the module dir, IMHO, as that would be the fallback. >> + >> + echo -n "Testing if $TARGET is set to 1 ..." >> + ORIG=$(cat "${TARGET}") > > This would fail if someone uses this script to test an older kernel, and > the scripts in selftests are supposed to work with older kernels. Oh, I didn't know that it's supposed to. > One > way to address this would be to just see if the file exists first and > ignore the test if the $SYSCTL directory exists but the file $TARGET > does not. > > For now we can just do this: > > if [ ! -d $TARGET ]; then > echo "Skipping test for $TARGET as it is not present ..." > return 0 > fi OK, just the -d test needs to be fixed :) Andrew can you please apply: ----8<---- >From a999e993a89e521b152bbd4b1466f69e62879c30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vlastimil Babka Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:59:49 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] lib/test_sysctl: support testing of sysctl. boot parameter - fix Skip the new test if boot_int sysctl is not present, otherwise, per Luis, "This would fail if someone uses this script to test an older kernel, and the scripts in selftests are supposed to work with older kernels." Suggested-by: Luis Chamberlain Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka --- tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh index ef6417b8067b..148704f465b5 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh @@ -756,6 +756,11 @@ sysctl_test_0006() sysctl_test_0007() { TARGET="${SYSCTL}/boot_int" + if [ ! -f $TARGET ]; then + echo "Skipping test for $TARGET as it is not present ..." + return 0 + fi + if [ -d $DIR ]; then echo "Boot param test only possible sysctl_test is built-in, not module:" cat $TEST_DIR/config >&2 -- 2.26.2