From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEADC00140 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 11:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 2A544940007; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:55:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 255006B0074; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:55:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 0F751940007; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:55:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E116B0073 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:55:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin23.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EF81A18D3 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 11:55:54 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79834332228.23.B11D8CD Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by imf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49FA840046 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 11:55:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1661342153; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uB7JX4rwQ1QQKKzqGmvRRI31yxXDnu7LmVuoM7kwxno=; b=R46xFHtTK1WMhJVfRcRaHKRhcx8mi/evrJsk57uYLD2jSs679h7Uk9Lfky9adEao7qa0Vi vwytk4gIBW5X2CmS49zqKRvweTJ69bqm319aD2vSnk36Dn1zaTunswy4ZuFACyUlKpKo6j 2GG7l4gsi3kSQxVxMufKAwBcM3Ts4FQ= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-155-MqD5ni6pOOOmpE19sHoWhA-1; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:55:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: MqD5ni6pOOOmpE19sHoWhA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id i7-20020a1c3b07000000b003a534ec2570so724125wma.7 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 04:55:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:from:references :cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=uB7JX4rwQ1QQKKzqGmvRRI31yxXDnu7LmVuoM7kwxno=; b=X8p3OhfDHncNtuQNKEfrbjHOgZlPkQoM1/chRNAVZwURfAH1FYzpBNNBEzmpVk9u2o SbsPDM5/ez6QJAS/wkf0PQRjGKrMB/HbP4xEsfYpg+3R5+YDAuuKugFUmRM4TANqXSAK dX99yXhEvw52RHXdhvcPtzf/Yj3WYbMeFVUoz05R+iZT4PvNR5uqx8l1ejjRXURshVbW JFRF0m6+2X2wixmey+FZwwhU9Hj8gKjCmDUmWG2jrEa5PYFy06JwlSIJsr9/HXCa0aSq qgbg7SmrsOI8mVd9NsNY6clY7vyAF6MiUK8JEJnKVTT3il31DCJgnXcJF1W8UcRlBLdW 1b9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1CAaqp42nHREllUZNDcvPDGYZRKKpBz9Vupkk/Ct2hnnbHUVkV 2KXsjZW6De4Dy5nsJrnDLFdeF4SqapGL1l+S8+nqa3rPG9U6wpq8Ca09XVMoX02vNfe1OsIGKek ZvOIpGVhgAVc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3048:b0:3a6:5ce0:9701 with SMTP id n8-20020a05600c304800b003a65ce09701mr5021977wmh.97.1661342151447; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 04:55:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR49bi50eCt2LNUrAZlvVOKjuNthVlkuzP0lLjDKV+SrdetW1FaWOpENe29cJZP7cBw3oYp1WQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3048:b0:3a6:5ce0:9701 with SMTP id n8-20020a05600c304800b003a65ce09701mr5021959wmh.97.1661342151154; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 04:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c707:c500:5445:cf40:2e32:6e73? (p200300cbc707c5005445cf402e326e73.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c707:c500:5445:cf40:2e32:6e73]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bt2-20020a056000080200b002255eebf785sm6594605wrb.89.2022.08.24.04.55.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Aug 2022 04:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <041e2e43-2227-1681-743e-5f82e245b5ea@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 13:55:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/hugetlb: fix races when looking up a CONT-PTE size hugetlb page To: Baolin Wang , Mike Kravetz Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, songmuchun@bytedance.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <0e5d92da043d147a867f634b17acbcc97a7f0e64.1661240170.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> <4c24b891-04ce-2608-79d2-a75dc236533f@redhat.com> <376d2e0a-d28a-984b-903c-1f6451b04a15@linux.alibaba.com> <7d4e7f47-30a5-3cc6-dc9f-aa89120847d8@redhat.com> <64669c0a-4a6e-f034-a15b-c4a8deea9e5d@linux.alibaba.com> <7ee73879-e402-9175-eae8-41471d80d59e@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1661342154; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=vDqTAwN12rPrr78qvCrb6LRuUjdorsfaeH3epAZw1dvq7JaQJkhaVKoCKB4C/sKZjA5XWe Czvq0TjabaIV0wd7K6eCvVMNDiLqYylrPcVUeeLdZNLluMDHwdM/3c5l9zjhB8ddWT2ZcU QiTq7xmMUR1iXdecb6v/1LI3Thwjl/I= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf04.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=R46xFHtT; spf=pass (imf04.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.129.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1661342154; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=uB7JX4rwQ1QQKKzqGmvRRI31yxXDnu7LmVuoM7kwxno=; b=2vv/2cpURxLyEQ3kui6tRwzT7sNME82Fvu9vb5o5vrPZWZEeHERT5cpLTZLukoc1reMtNi QmIg5u2kjFUv5E+pMUzxX9esOXHrThryW5VfP91hLtTYZIm4c2TAOmOxBVVpDNU/HFcu6w /lVHIpPG03osFhcadwZWDM7xxqbtA84= X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam08 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49FA840046 Authentication-Results: imf04.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=R46xFHtT; spf=pass (imf04.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.129.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com X-Stat-Signature: zi78zxq5xpytib5rmkfenbce3s591ucx X-HE-Tag: 1661342154-615149 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 24.08.22 11:41, Baolin Wang wrote: > > > On 8/24/2022 3:31 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> IMHO, these follow_huge_xxx() functions are arch-specified at first and >>>>>> were moved into the common hugetlb.c by commit 9e5fc74c3025 ("mm: >>>>>> hugetlb: Copy general hugetlb code from x86 to mm"), and now there are >>>>>> still some arch-specified follow_huge_xxx() definition, for example: >>>>>> ia64: follow_huge_addr >>>>>> powerpc: follow_huge_pd >>>>>> s390: follow_huge_pud >>>>>> >>>>>> What I mean is that follow_hugetlb_page() is a common and >>>>>> not-arch-specified function, is it suitable to change it to be >>>>>> arch-specified? >>>>>> And thinking more, can we rename follow_hugetlb_page() as >>>>>> hugetlb_page_faultin() and simplify it to only handle the page faults of >>>>>> hugetlb like the faultin_page() for normal page? That means we can make >>>>>> sure only follow_page_mask() can handle hugetlb. >>>>>> >>>> >>>> Something like that might work, but you still have two page table walkers >>>> for hugetlb. I like David's idea (if I understand it correctly) of >>> >>> What I mean is we may change the hugetlb handling like normal page: >>> 1) use follow_page_mask() to look up a hugetlb firstly. >>> 2) if can not get the hugetlb, then try to page fault by >>> hugetlb_page_faultin(). >>> 3) if page fault successed, then retry to find hugetlb by >>> follow_page_mask(). >> >> That implies putting more hugetlbfs special code into generic GUP, >> turning it even more complicated. But of course, it depends on how the >> end result looks like. My gut feeling was that hugetlb is better handled >> in follow_hugetlb_page() separately (just like we do with a lot of other >> page table walkers). > > OK, fair enough. > >>> >>> Just a rough thought, and I need more investigation for my idea and >>> David's idea. >>> >>>> using follow_hugetlb_page for both cases. As noted, it will need to be >>>> taught how to not trigger faults in the follow_page_mask case. >>> >>> Anyway, I also agree we need some cleanup, and firstly I think we should >>> cleanup these arch-specified follow_huge_xxx() on some architectures >>> which are similar with the common ones. I will look into these. >> >> There was a recent discussion on that, e.g.: >> >> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220818135717.609eef8a@thinkpad > > Thanks. > >> >>> >>> However, considering cleanup may need more investigation and >>> refactoring, now I prefer to make these bug-fix patches of this patchset >>> into mainline firstly, which are suitable to backport to old version to >>> fix potential race issues. Mike and David, how do you think? Could you >>> help to review these patches? Thanks. >> >> Patch #1 certainly add more special code just to handle another hugetlb >> corner case (CONT pages), and maybe just making it all use >> follow_hugetlb_page() would be even cleaner and less error prone. >> >> I agree that locking is shaky, but I'm not sure if we really want to >> backport this to stable trees: >> >> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html >> >> "It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, “This could be a >> problem...” type thing)." >> >> >> Do we actually have any instance of this being a real (and not a >> theoretical) problem? If not, I'd rather clean it all up right away. > > I think this is a real problem (not theoretical), and easy to write some > code to show the issue. For example, suppose thread A is trying to look > up a CONT-PTE size hugetlb page under the lock, however antoher thread B > can migrate the CONT-PTE hugetlb page at the same time, which will cause > thread A to get an incorrect page, if thread A want to do something for > this incorrect page, error occurs. > > Actually we also want to backport these fixes to the distro with old > kernel versions to make the hugetlb more stable. Otherwise we must hit > these issues sooner or later if the customers use CONT-PTE/PMD hugetlb. > > Anyway, if you and Mike still think these issues are not important > enough to be fixed in the old versions, I can do the cleanup firstly. > [asking myself which follow_page() users actually care about hugetlb, and why we need this handling in follow_page at all] Which follow_page() user do we care about here? Primarily mm/migrate.c only I assume? -- Thanks, David / dhildenb