From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] hugetlb: do not update address in huge_pmd_unshare
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 10:06:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <069d55ca-ca62-0841-b52f-c4352f37959a@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YpTki4Tvv2muTeJu@FVFYT0MHHV2J.googleapis.com>
On 5/30/22 08:36, Muchun Song wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 03:58:48PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> As an optimization for loops sequentially processing hugetlb address
>> ranges, huge_pmd_unshare would update a passed address if it unshared a
>> pmd. Updating a loop control variable outside the loop like this is
>> generally a bad idea. These loops are now using hugetlb_mask_last_hp
>
> Totally agree.
>
>> to optimize scanning when non-present ptes are discovered. The same
>> can be done when huge_pmd_unshare returns 1 indicating a pmd was
>> unshared.
>>
>> Remove address update from huge_pmd_unshare. Change the passed argument
>> type and update all callers. In loops sequentially processing addresses
>> use hugetlb_mask_last_hp to update address if pmd is unshared.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
>
> Acked-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
>
> Some nits below.
>
>> ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, address, sz);
>> if (!ptep)
>> continue;
>> ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, mm, ptep);
>> /* We don't want 'address' to be changed */
>
> Dead comment, should be removed.
Thanks! I missed that.
--
Mike Kravetz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-31 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-27 22:58 [RFC PATCH 0/3] hugetlb: speed up linear address scanning Mike Kravetz
2022-05-27 22:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] hugetlb: skip to end of PT page mapping when pte not present Mike Kravetz
2022-05-30 10:10 ` Baolin Wang
2022-05-31 16:56 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-06-15 21:22 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-06-16 3:48 ` Baolin Wang
2022-05-30 19:56 ` Peter Xu
2022-05-31 2:04 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-31 17:05 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-06-01 6:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-05-31 17:00 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-06-15 17:27 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-06-15 17:51 ` Peter Xu
2022-05-27 22:58 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] hugetlb: do not update address in huge_pmd_unshare Mike Kravetz
2022-05-30 10:14 ` Baolin Wang
2022-05-30 15:36 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-31 17:06 ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2022-05-27 22:58 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] hugetlb: Lazy page table copies in fork() Mike Kravetz
2022-05-31 17:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-01 5:20 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=069d55ca-ca62-0841-b52f-c4352f37959a@oracle.com \
--to=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).