linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org,
	hughd@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru,
	daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com,
	willy@infradead.org, shakeelb@google.com,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	"Vladimir Davydov" <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	"Roman Gushchin" <guro@fb.com>,
	"Chris Down" <chris@chrisdown.name>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>, "Qian Cai" <cai@lca.pw>,
	"Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	swkhack <swkhack@gmail.com>,
	"Potyra, Stefan" <Stefan.Potyra@elektrobit.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	"Colin Ian King" <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
	"Peng Fan" <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
	"Nikolay Borisov" <nborisov@suse.com>,
	"Ira Weiny" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	"Kirill Tkhai" <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
	"Yafang Shao" <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
	"Wei Yang" <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/10] mm/lru: replace pgdat lru_lock with lruvec lock
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:01:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bed9f1a-400d-d9a9-aeb4-de1dd9ccbb45@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54af0662-cbb4-88c7-7eae-f969684025dd@linux.alibaba.com>



在 2020/4/15 下午9:42, Alex Shi 写道:
> Hi Johannes,
> 
> Thanks a lot for point out!
> 
> Charging in __read_swap_cache_async would ask for 3 layers function arguments
> pass, that would be a bit ugly. Compare to this, could we move out the
> lru_cache add after commit_charge, like ksm copied pages?
> 
> That give a bit extra non lru list time, but the page just only be used only
> after add_anon_rmap setting. Could it cause troubles?

Hi Johannes & Andrew,

Doing lru_cache_add_anon during swapin_readahead can give a very short timing 
for possible page reclaiming for these few pages.

If we delay these few pages lru adding till after the vm_fault target page 
get memcg charging(mem_cgroup_commit_charge) and activate, we could skip the 
mem_cgroup_try_charge/commit_charge/cancel_charge process in __read_swap_cache_async().
But the cost is maximum SWAP_RA_ORDER_CEILING number pages on each cpu miss
page reclaiming in a short time. On the other hand, save the target vm_fault
page from reclaiming before activate it during that time.

Judging the lose and gain, and the example of shmem/ksm copied pages, I believe 
it's fine to delay lru list adding till activate the target swapin page.

Any comments are appreciated! 

Thanks
Alex


> 
> I tried to track down the reason of lru_cache_add here, but no explanation
> till first git kernel commit.
> 
> Thanks
> Alex 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-16  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-16  3:04 [PATCH v8 00/10] per lruvec lru_lock for memcg Alex Shi
2020-01-16  3:05 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] mm/vmscan: remove unnecessary lruvec adding Alex Shi
2020-01-16  3:05 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] mm/memcg: fold lock_page_lru into commit_charge Alex Shi
2020-01-16  3:05 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] mm/lru: replace pgdat lru_lock with lruvec lock Alex Shi
2020-01-16 21:52   ` Johannes Weiner
2020-01-19 11:32     ` Alex Shi
2020-01-20 12:58     ` Alex Shi
2020-01-21 16:00       ` Johannes Weiner
2020-01-22 12:01         ` Alex Shi
2020-01-22 18:31           ` Johannes Weiner
2020-04-13 10:48     ` Alex Shi
2020-04-13 18:07       ` Johannes Weiner
2020-04-14  4:52         ` Alex Shi
2020-04-14 16:31           ` Johannes Weiner
2020-04-15 13:42             ` Alex Shi
2020-04-16  8:01               ` Alex Shi [this message]
2020-04-16 15:28                 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-04-16 17:47                   ` Shakeel Butt
2020-04-17 13:18                     ` Alex Shi
2020-04-17 14:39                   ` Alex Shi
2020-04-14  8:19         ` Alex Shi
2020-04-14 16:36           ` Johannes Weiner
2020-01-16  3:05 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] mm/lru: introduce the relock_page_lruvec function Alex Shi
2020-01-16  3:05 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] mm/mlock: optimize munlock_pagevec by relocking Alex Shi
2020-01-16  3:05 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] mm/swap: only change the lru_lock iff page's lruvec is different Alex Shi
2020-01-16  3:05 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] mm/pgdat: remove pgdat lru_lock Alex Shi
2020-01-16  3:05 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] mm/lru: revise the comments of lru_lock Alex Shi
2020-01-16  3:05 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] mm/lru: add debug checking for page memcg moving Alex Shi
2020-01-16  3:05 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] mm/memcg: add debug checking in lock_page_memcg Alex Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0bed9f1a-400d-d9a9-aeb4-de1dd9ccbb45@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=Stefan.Potyra@elektrobit.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=swkhack@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).