From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f198.google.com (mail-pf0-f198.google.com [209.85.192.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1F66B0003 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 13:49:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f198.google.com with SMTP id y26-v6so3189239pfn.14 for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 10:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n9-v6si3772793plk.310.2018.07.04.10.49.54 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Jul 2018 10:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] add param that allows bootline control of hardened usercopy References: <1530646988-25546-1-git-send-email-crecklin@redhat.com> From: Vlastimil Babka Message-ID: <0bf9be39-82bb-ad3a-a3c3-e41bebedba7e@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 19:47:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Kees Cook Cc: Chris von Recklinghausen , Laura Abbott , Paolo Abeni , LKML , Linux-MM , Kernel Hardening On 07/04/2018 06:52 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 07/03/2018 09:43 PM, Chris von Recklinghausen wrote: >> >> Subject: [PATCH v7] add param that allows bootline control of hardened >> usercopy >> >> s/bootline/boot time/ ? >> >>> v1->v2: >>> remove CONFIG_HUC_DEFAULT_OFF >>> default is now enabled, boot param disables >>> move check to __check_object_size so as to not break optimization of >>> __builtin_constant_p() >> >> Sorry for late and drive-by suggestion, but I think the change above is >> kind of a waste because there's a function call overhead only to return >> immediately. >> >> Something like this should work and keep benefits of both the built-in >> check and avoiding function call? >> >> static __always_inline void check_object_size(const void *ptr, unsigned >> long n, bool to_user) >> { >> if (!__builtin_constant_p(n) && >> static_branch_likely(&bypass_usercopy_checks)) >> __check_object_size(ptr, n, to_user); >> } > > This produces less efficient code in the general case, and I'd like to > keep the general case (hardening enabled) as fast as possible. How specifically is the code less efficient? It should be always a static key check (no-op thanks to the code patching involved) and a function call in the "hardening enabled" case, just in different order. And in either case compiled out if it's a constant. > -Kees >