linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/11] mm/page_alloc: reuse tail struct pages for compound pagemaps
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:41:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c6a4dab-296d-94b2-f885-2371292f9e0d@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4hJtqVGoA3ppCMfVQ4ZnWUa7jKtp=Huxu9mcSk4huq_7Q@mail.gmail.com>



On 6/7/21 8:32 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 6:49 AM Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> wrote:
> [..]
>>> Given all of the above I'm wondering if there should be a new
>>> "compound specific" flavor of this routine rather than trying to
>>> cleverly inter mingle the old path with the new. This is easier
>>> because you have already done the work in previous patches to break
>>> this into helpers. So just have memmap_init_zone_device() do it the
>>> "old" way and memmap_init_compound() handle all the tail page init +
>>> optimizations.
>>>
>> I can separate it out, should be easier to follow.
>>
>> Albeit just a note, I think memmap_init_compound() should be the new normal as metadata
>> more accurately represents what goes on the page tables. That's regardless of
>> vmemmap-based gains, and hence why my train of thought was to not separate it.
>>
>> After this series, all devmap pages where @geometry matches @align will have compound
>> pages be used instead. And we enable that in device-dax as first user (in the next patch).
>> altmap or not so far just differentiates on the uniqueness of struct pages as the former
>> doesn't reuse base pages that only contain tail pages and consequently makes us initialize
>> all tail struct pages.
> 
> I think combining the cases into a common central routine makes the
> code that much harder to maintain. A small duplication cost is worth
> it in my opinion to help readability / maintainability.
> 
I am addressing this comment and taking a step back. By just moving the tail page init to
memmap_init_compound() this gets a lot more readable. Albeit now I think having separate
top-level loops over pfns, doesn't bring much improvement there.

Here's what I have by moving just tails init to a separate routine. See your original
suggestion after the scissors mark. I have a slight inclination towards the first one, but
no really strong preference. Thoughts?

[...]

static void __ref memmap_init_compound(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
                                        unsigned long zone_idx, int nid,
                                        struct dev_pagemap *pgmap,
                                        unsigned long nr_pages)
{
        unsigned int order_align = order_base_2(nr_pages);
        unsigned long i;

        __SetPageHead(page);

        for (i = 1; i < nr_pages; i++) {
                __init_zone_device_page(page + i, pfn + i, zone_idx,
                                        nid, pgmap);
                prep_compound_tail(page, i);

                /*
                 * The first and second tail pages need to
                 * initialized first, hence the head page is
                 * prepared last.
                 */
                if (i == 2)
                        prep_compound_head(page, order_align);
        }
}

void __ref memmap_init_zone_device(struct zone *zone,
                                   unsigned long start_pfn,
                                   unsigned long nr_pages,
                                   struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
{
        unsigned long pfn, end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages;
        struct pglist_data *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
        struct vmem_altmap *altmap = pgmap_altmap(pgmap);
        unsigned long pfns_per_compound = pgmap_pfn_geometry(pgmap);
        unsigned long zone_idx = zone_idx(zone);
        unsigned long start = jiffies;
        int nid = pgdat->node_id;

        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pgmap || zone_idx(zone) != ZONE_DEVICE))
                return;

        /*
         * The call to memmap_init_zone should have already taken care
         * of the pages reserved for the memmap, so we can just jump to
         * the end of that region and start processing the device pages.
         */
        if (altmap) {
                start_pfn = altmap->base_pfn + vmem_altmap_offset(altmap);
                nr_pages = end_pfn - start_pfn;
        }

        for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += pfns_per_compound) {
                struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);

                __init_zone_device_page(page, pfn, zone_idx, nid, pgmap);

                if (pfns_per_compound == 1)
                        continue;

                memmap_init_compound(page, pfn, zone_idx, nid, pgmap,
                                     pfns_per_compound);
        }

        pr_info("%s initialised %lu pages in %ums\n", __func__,
                nr_pages, jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - start));
}


[...]

--->8-----
Whereas your original suggestion would look more like this:

[...]

static void __ref memmap_init_compound(unsigned long zone_idx, int nid,
                                        struct dev_pagemap *pgmap,
                                        unsigned long start_pfn,
                                        unsigned long end_pfn)
{
        unsigned long pfns_per_compound = pgmap_pfn_geometry(pgmap);
        unsigned int order_align = order_base_2(pfns_per_compound);
        unsigned long i;

        for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += pfns_per_compound) {
                struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);

                __init_zone_device_page(page, pfn, zone_idx, nid, pgmap);

                __SetPageHead(page);

                for (i = 1; i < pfns_per_compound; i++) {
                        __init_zone_device_page(page + i, pfn + i, zone_idx,
                                                nid, pgmap);
                        prep_compound_tail(page, i);

                        /*
                         * The first and second tail pages need to
                         * initialized first, hence the head page is
                         * prepared last.
                         */
                        if (i == 2)
                                prep_compound_head(page, order_align);
                }
        }
}

static void __ref memmap_init_base(unsigned long zone_idx, int nid,
                                         struct dev_pagemap *pgmap,
                                         unsigned long start_pfn,
                                         unsigned long end_pfn)
{
        for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
                struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);

                __init_zone_device_page(page, pfn, zone_idx, nid, pgmap);
        }
}

void __ref memmap_init_zone_device(struct zone *zone,
                                   unsigned long start_pfn,
                                   unsigned long nr_pages,
                                   struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
{
        unsigned long pfn, end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages;
        struct pglist_data *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
        struct vmem_altmap *altmap = pgmap_altmap(pgmap);
        bool compound = pgmap_geometry(pgmap) > PAGE_SIZE;
        unsigned long zone_idx = zone_idx(zone);
        unsigned long start = jiffies;
        int nid = pgdat->node_id;

        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pgmap || zone_idx(zone) != ZONE_DEVICE))
                return;

        /*
         * The call to memmap_init_zone should have already taken care
         * of the pages reserved for the memmap, so we can just jump to
         * the end of that region and start processing the device pages.
         */
        if (altmap) {
                start_pfn = altmap->base_pfn + vmem_altmap_offset(altmap);
                nr_pages = end_pfn - start_pfn;
        }

        if (compound)
                memmap_init_compound(zone_idx, nid, pgmap, start_pfn, end_pfn);
        else
                memmap_init_base(zone_idx, nid, pgmap, start_pfn, end_pfn);

        pr_info("%s initialised %lu pages in %ums\n", __func__,
                nr_pages, jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - start));
}



  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-14 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-25 23:09 [PATCH v1 00/11] mm, sparse-vmemmap: Introduce compound pagemaps Joao Martins
2021-03-25 23:09 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] memory-failure: fetch compound_head after pgmap_pfn_valid() Joao Martins
2021-04-24  0:12   ` Dan Williams
2021-04-24 19:00     ` Joao Martins
2021-03-25 23:09 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] mm/page_alloc: split prep_compound_page into head and tail subparts Joao Martins
2021-04-24  0:16   ` Dan Williams
2021-04-24 19:05     ` Joao Martins
2021-03-25 23:09 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] mm/page_alloc: refactor memmap_init_zone_device() page init Joao Martins
2021-04-24  0:18   ` Dan Williams
2021-04-24 19:05     ` Joao Martins
2021-03-25 23:09 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] mm/memremap: add ZONE_DEVICE support for compound pages Joao Martins
2021-05-05 18:44   ` Dan Williams
2021-05-05 18:58     ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-05-05 19:49     ` Joao Martins
2021-05-05 22:20       ` Dan Williams
2021-05-05 22:36         ` Joao Martins
2021-05-05 23:03           ` Dan Williams
2021-05-06 10:12             ` Joao Martins
2021-05-18 17:27           ` Joao Martins
2021-05-18 19:56             ` Jane Chu
2021-05-19 11:29               ` Joao Martins
2021-05-19 18:36                 ` Jane Chu
2021-06-07 20:17             ` Dan Williams
2021-06-07 20:47               ` Joao Martins
2021-06-07 21:00                 ` Joao Martins
2021-06-07 21:57                   ` Dan Williams
2021-05-06  8:05         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-05-06 10:23           ` Joao Martins
2021-05-06 11:43             ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-05-06 12:15               ` Joao Martins
2021-03-25 23:09 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: add a pgmap argument to section activation Joao Martins
2021-05-05 22:34   ` Dan Williams
2021-05-05 22:37     ` Joao Martins
2021-05-05 23:14       ` Dan Williams
2021-05-06 10:24         ` Joao Martins
2021-03-25 23:09 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: refactor vmemmap_populate_basepages() Joao Martins
2021-05-05 22:43   ` Dan Williams
2021-05-06 10:27     ` Joao Martins
2021-05-06 18:36       ` Joao Martins
2021-03-25 23:09 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: populate compound pagemaps Joao Martins
2021-05-06  1:18   ` Dan Williams
2021-05-06 11:01     ` Joao Martins
2021-05-10 19:19       ` Dan Williams
2021-05-13 18:45         ` Joao Martins
2021-06-16 15:05           ` Joao Martins
2021-06-16 23:35             ` Dan Williams
2021-03-25 23:09 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: use hugepages for PUD " Joao Martins
2021-06-01 19:30   ` Dan Williams
2021-06-07 12:02     ` Joao Martins
2021-06-07 19:47       ` Dan Williams
2021-03-25 23:09 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] mm/page_alloc: reuse tail struct pages for " Joao Martins
2021-06-01 23:35   ` Dan Williams
2021-06-07 13:48     ` Joao Martins
2021-06-07 19:32       ` Dan Williams
2021-06-14 18:41         ` Joao Martins [this message]
2021-06-14 23:07           ` Dan Williams
2021-03-25 23:09 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] device-dax: compound pagemap support Joao Martins
2021-06-02  0:36   ` Dan Williams
2021-06-07 13:59     ` Joao Martins
2021-03-25 23:09 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] mm/gup: grab head page refcount once for group of subpages Joao Martins
2021-06-02  1:05   ` Dan Williams
2021-06-07 15:21     ` Joao Martins
2021-06-07 19:22       ` Dan Williams
2021-04-01  9:38 ` [PATCH v1 00/11] mm, sparse-vmemmap: Introduce compound pagemaps Joao Martins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0c6a4dab-296d-94b2-f885-2371292f9e0d@oracle.com \
    --to=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).