From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E89C433DF for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F39A2080C for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="qfGbxYWP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7F39A2080C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 1EF278D00AB; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:31:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 19F2E8D00A6; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:31:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 067708D00AB; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:31:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0185.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.185]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FEE8D00A6 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:31:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin10.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CF6180AD82F for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:31:47 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76946200254.10.uncle74_200570226e19 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B1E16A4CA for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:31:47 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: uncle74_200570226e19 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 10007 Received: from mail-ed1-f66.google.com (mail-ed1-f66.google.com [209.85.208.66]) by imf47.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f66.google.com with SMTP id s28so7737484edw.11 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 07:31:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:cc:references:from:autocrypt:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zC9AxEMt7YYbkkc9pOMfKGRRIytJLBNa69I7ipYNpA0=; b=qfGbxYWPix1j1jOi3rcd0Wrqa8jwJFd6QwSqBIl7j1Zy4a0F4AQSnmikVYOa68CI8a cdymeuPS/yW+eO+srgAlTCh2/DJc8FSaEwauKCPJu+X8/ebZXv0nV7KssJ6LjVIqhDkW 0iGVMesvBqGg2qv3tYlOEpKj4dGdUKG5pjFMC+WFoZ3pXIh2GRHNgQ+PuX6ayiuKUETo b+mD3imxoIS1wGKy8UB/IjicIBoMZSE3BBAznJRD2FisjYotUbHaT1VGSJCuO+bj+1cg d53vQ8C5O09IZ81zgxOrgZu9xtqXeJb5J+AFATBDN/GQPs8Z/lqwerfD0nAm4viEPRNd 3QzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:references:from:autocrypt:subject :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zC9AxEMt7YYbkkc9pOMfKGRRIytJLBNa69I7ipYNpA0=; b=AVM3uQrZGYaEL6z/89VvUDmKIpxOc8QJjItuuSXIVamgpZbQKeFHmt+ZyWWTgZm9bV gpScovYzhxiH6wAyrIjtk/X/jxWV539BVUUOqBpTaU0ZEEdZzaoP0MC21iyDla/zaKiw kxUbgIAV8KM+5GnVgOsN2i03fCia2FtBcKsliQ5qc8MjFtSNdrdoHbC1W9IELLin28UY P5rpQqSBhm4WXcDs0oVxKYO2f//KbsX3ad4VN0LCqfzpPpLSy5E/baputwEUd1p8pH74 2MmoHMPpLkDF6cYeNQB0VPPNEPBWEd/JUToohBou3OFJDlX8rgWg8HMyu4DVKzsa+U6n je3g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wC2NjC1J+NiLZ0/nuvXmm+nGoqDJKpFbud8CxvTKPP3jQawFV ZhZFhqw8S9IItUNRIuDaGlmEijwi X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy33EVDyrZlLDOGMSHYTGT8tGB5/zUUUGC5XsQ2dDLRdzX/WAHpIR1Lc22EEgN1FYZyBap9PA== X-Received: by 2002:a50:f1d9:: with SMTP id y25mr3484082edl.292.1592577105240; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 07:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.243] ([5.100.193.151]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ss4sm4844529ejb.63.2020.06.19.07.31.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 07:31:44 -0700 (PDT) To: Jens Axboe , io-uring@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org References: <20200618144355.17324-1-axboe@kernel.dk> <20200618144355.17324-5-axboe@kernel.dk> From: Pavel Begunkov Autocrypt: addr=asml.silence@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFmKBOQBEAC76ZFxLAKpDw0bKQ8CEiYJRGn8MHTUhURL02/7n1t0HkKQx2K1fCXClbps bdwSHrhOWdW61pmfMbDYbTj6ZvGRvhoLWfGkzujB2wjNcbNTXIoOzJEGISHaPf6E2IQx1ik9 6uqVkK1OMb7qRvKH0i7HYP4WJzYbEWVyLiAxUj611mC9tgd73oqZ2pLYzGTqF2j6a/obaqha +hXuWTvpDQXqcOZJXIW43atprH03G1tQs7VwR21Q1eq6Yvy2ESLdc38EqCszBfQRMmKy+cfp W3U9Mb1w0L680pXrONcnlDBCN7/sghGeMHjGKfNANjPc+0hzz3rApPxpoE7HC1uRiwC4et83 CKnncH1l7zgeBT9Oa3qEiBlaa1ZCBqrA4dY+z5fWJYjMpwI1SNp37RtF8fKXbKQg+JuUjAa9 Y6oXeyEvDHMyJYMcinl6xCqCBAXPHnHmawkMMgjr3BBRzODmMr+CPVvnYe7BFYfoajzqzq+h EyXSl3aBf0IDPTqSUrhbmjj5OEOYgRW5p+mdYtY1cXeK8copmd+fd/eTkghok5li58AojCba jRjp7zVOLOjDlpxxiKhuFmpV4yWNh5JJaTbwCRSd04sCcDNlJj+TehTr+o1QiORzc2t+N5iJ NbILft19Izdn8U39T5oWiynqa1qCLgbuFtnYx1HlUq/HvAm+kwARAQABtDFQYXZlbCBCZWd1 bmtvdiAoc2lsZW5jZSkgPGFzbWwuc2lsZW5jZUBnbWFpbC5jb20+iQJOBBMBCAA4FiEE+6Ju PTjTbx479o3OWt5b1Glr+6UFAlmKBOQCGwMFCwkIBwIGFQgJCgsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ Wt5b1Glr+6WxZA//QueaKHzgdnOikJ7NA/Vq8FmhRlwgtP0+E+w93kL+ZGLzS/cUCIjn2f4Q Mcutj2Neg0CcYPX3b2nJiKr5Vn0rjJ/suiaOa1h1KzyNTOmxnsqE5fmxOf6C6x+NKE18I5Jy xzLQoktbdDVA7JfB1itt6iWSNoOTVcvFyvfe5ggy6FSCcP+m1RlR58XxVLH+qlAvxxOeEr/e aQfUzrs7gqdSd9zQGEZo0jtuBiB7k98t9y0oC9Jz0PJdvaj1NZUgtXG9pEtww3LdeXP/TkFl HBSxVflzeoFaj4UAuy8+uve7ya/ECNCc8kk0VYaEjoVrzJcYdKP583iRhOLlZA6HEmn/+Gh9 4orG67HNiJlbFiW3whxGizWsrtFNLsSP1YrEReYk9j1SoUHHzsu+ZtNfKuHIhK0sU07G1OPN 2rDLlzUWR9Jc22INAkhVHOogOcc5ajMGhgWcBJMLCoi219HlX69LIDu3Y34uIg9QPZIC2jwr 24W0kxmK6avJr7+n4o8m6sOJvhlumSp5TSNhRiKvAHB1I2JB8Q1yZCIPzx+w1ALxuoWiCdwV M/azguU42R17IuBzK0S3hPjXpEi2sK/k4pEPnHVUv9Cu09HCNnd6BRfFGjo8M9kZvw360gC1 reeMdqGjwQ68o9x0R7NBRrtUOh48TDLXCANAg97wjPoy37dQE7e5Ag0EWYoE5AEQAMWS+aBV IJtCjwtfCOV98NamFpDEjBMrCAfLm7wZlmXy5I6o7nzzCxEw06P2rhzp1hIqkaab1kHySU7g dkpjmQ7Jjlrf6KdMP87mC/Hx4+zgVCkTQCKkIxNE76Ff3O9uTvkWCspSh9J0qPYyCaVta2D1 Sq5HZ8WFcap71iVO1f2/FEHKJNz/YTSOS/W7dxJdXl2eoj3gYX2UZNfoaVv8OXKaWslZlgqN jSg9wsTv1K73AnQKt4fFhscN9YFxhtgD/SQuOldE5Ws4UlJoaFX/yCoJL3ky2kC0WFngzwRF Yo6u/KON/o28yyP+alYRMBrN0Dm60FuVSIFafSqXoJTIjSZ6olbEoT0u17Rag8BxnxryMrgR dkccq272MaSS0eOC9K2rtvxzddohRFPcy/8bkX+t2iukTDz75KSTKO+chce62Xxdg62dpkZX xK+HeDCZ7gRNZvAbDETr6XI63hPKi891GeZqvqQVYR8e+V2725w+H1iv3THiB1tx4L2bXZDI DtMKQ5D2RvCHNdPNcZeldEoJwKoA60yg6tuUquvsLvfCwtrmVI2rL2djYxRfGNmFMrUDN1Xq F3xozA91q3iZd9OYi9G+M/OA01husBdcIzj1hu0aL+MGg4Gqk6XwjoSxVd4YT41kTU7Kk+/I 5/Nf+i88ULt6HanBYcY/+Daeo/XFABEBAAGJAjYEGAEIACAWIQT7om49ONNvHjv2jc5a3lvU aWv7pQUCWYoE5AIbDAAKCRBa3lvUaWv7pfmcEACKTRQ28b1y5ztKuLdLr79+T+LwZKHjX++P 4wKjEOECCcB6KCv3hP+J2GCXDOPZvdg/ZYZafqP68Yy8AZqkfa4qPYHmIdpODtRzZSL48kM8 LRzV8Rl7J3ItvzdBRxf4T/Zseu5U6ELiQdCUkPGsJcPIJkgPjO2ROG/ZtYa9DvnShNWPlp+R uPwPccEQPWO/NP4fJl2zwC6byjljZhW5kxYswGMLBwb5cDUZAisIukyAa8Xshdan6C2RZcNs rB3L7vsg/R8UCehxOH0C+NypG2GqjVejNZsc7bgV49EOVltS+GmGyY+moIzxsuLmT93rqyII 5rSbbcTLe6KBYcs24XEoo49Zm9oDA3jYvNpeYD8rDcnNbuZh9kTgBwFN41JHOPv0W2FEEWqe JsCwQdcOQ56rtezdCJUYmRAt3BsfjN3Jn3N6rpodi4Dkdli8HylM5iq4ooeb5VkQ7UZxbCWt UVMKkOCdFhutRmYp0mbv2e87IK4erwNHQRkHUkzbsuym8RVpAZbLzLPIYK/J3RTErL6Z99N2 m3J6pjwSJY/zNwuFPs9zGEnRO4g0BUbwGdbuvDzaq6/3OJLKohr5eLXNU3JkT+3HezydWm3W OPhauth7W0db74Qd49HXK0xe/aPrK+Cp+kU1HRactyNtF8jZQbhMCC8vMGukZtWaAwpjWiiH bA== Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] io_uring: re-issue block requests that failed because of resources Message-ID: <105a78f0-407f-09e3-5951-7f76756762b2@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:30:16 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 31B1E16A4CA X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 19/06/2020 17:22, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 6/19/20 8:12 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: >> On 18/06/2020 17:43, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> Mark the plug with nowait =3D=3D true, which will cause requests to a= void >>> blocking on request allocation. If they do, we catch them and reissue >>> them from a task_work based handler. >>> >>> Normally we can catch -EAGAIN directly, but the hard case is for spli= t >>> requests. As an example, the application issues a 512KB request. The >>> block core will split this into 128KB if that's the max size for the >>> device. The first request issues just fine, but we run into -EAGAIN f= or >>> some latter splits for the same request. As the bio is split, we don'= t >>> get to see the -EAGAIN until one of the actual reads complete, and he= nce >>> we cannot handle it inline as part of submission. >>> >>> This does potentially cause re-reads of parts of the range, as the wh= ole >>> request is reissued. There's currently no better way to handle this. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe >>> --- >>> fs/io_uring.c | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------= -- >>> 1 file changed, 124 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c >>> index 2e257c5a1866..40413fb9d07b 100644 >>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c >>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c >>> @@ -900,6 +900,13 @@ static int io_file_get(struct io_submit_state *s= tate, struct io_kiocb *req, >>> static void __io_queue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, >>> const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe); >>> =20 >> ...> + >>> +static void io_rw_resubmit(struct callback_head *cb) >>> +{ >>> + struct io_kiocb *req =3D container_of(cb, struct io_kiocb, task_wor= k); >>> + struct io_ring_ctx *ctx =3D req->ctx; >>> + int err; >>> + >>> + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); >>> + >>> + err =3D io_sq_thread_acquire_mm(ctx, req); >>> + >>> + if (io_resubmit_prep(req, err)) { >>> + refcount_inc(&req->refs); >>> + io_queue_async_work(req); >>> + } >> >> Hmm, I have similar stuff but for iopoll. On top removing grab_env* fo= r >> linked reqs and some extra. I think I'll rebase on top of this. >=20 > Yes, there's certainly overlap there. I consider this series basically > wrapped up, so feel free to just base on top of it. >=20 >>> +static bool io_rw_reissue(struct io_kiocb *req, long res) >>> +{ >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK >>> + struct task_struct *tsk; >>> + int ret; >>> + >>> + if ((res !=3D -EAGAIN && res !=3D -EOPNOTSUPP) || io_wq_current_is_= worker()) >>> + return false; >>> + >>> + tsk =3D req->task; >>> + init_task_work(&req->task_work, io_rw_resubmit); >>> + ret =3D task_work_add(tsk, &req->task_work, true); >> >> I don't like that the request becomes un-discoverable for cancellation >> awhile sitting in the task_work list. Poll stuff at least have hash_no= de >> for that. >=20 > Async buffered IO was never cancelable, so it doesn't really matter. > It's tied to the task, so we know it'll get executed - either run, or > canceled if the task is going away. This is really not that different > from having the work discoverable through io-wq queueing before, since > the latter could never be canceled anyway as it sits there > uninterruptibly waiting for IO completion. Makes sense. I was thinking about using this task-requeue for all kinds of requests. Though, instead of speculating it'd be better for me to embo= dy ideas into patches and see. --=20 Pavel Begunkov