From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A2F6007BA for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 03:35:51 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] mm: handle_speculative_fault() From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <28c262361001042209k7241dd38l3d51d230e7b68a5@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100104182429.833180340@chello.nl> <20100104182813.753545361@chello.nl> <20100105092559.1de8b613.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <28c262361001042029w4b95f226lf54a3ed6a4291a3b@mail.gmail.com> <28c262361001042209k7241dd38l3d51d230e7b68a5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:35:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1262680521.2400.25.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Minchan Kim Cc: Linus Torvalds , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , "Paul E. McKenney" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , cl@linux-foundation.org, "hugh.dickins" , Nick Piggin , Ingo Molnar List-ID: On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 15:09 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > Couldn't we synchronize rcu in that cases(munmap, exit and so on)? > It can delay munap and exit but it would be better than handling them by more > complicated things, I think. And both cases aren't often cases so we > can achieve advantage than disadvantage? Sadly there are programs that mmap()/munmap() at a staggering rate (clamav comes to mind), so munmap() performance is important too. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org