From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com [209.85.220.45]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5749D9C002A for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 06:30:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id rd3so7099645pab.18 for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 03:30:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Mel Gorman Subject: [PATCH 50/63] sched: numa: call task_numa_free from do_execve Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:29:28 +0100 Message-Id: <1381141781-10992-51-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <1381141781-10992-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> References: <1381141781-10992-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra , Rik van Riel Cc: Srikar Dronamraju , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Linux-MM , LKML , Mel Gorman From: Rik van Riel It is possible for a task in a numa group to call exec, and have the new (unrelated) executable inherit the numa group association from its former self. This has the potential to break numa grouping, and is trivial to fix. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman --- fs/exec.c | 1 + include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++++ kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 ++++++++- kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 ----- 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index 8875dd1..2ea437e 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -1547,6 +1547,7 @@ static int do_execve_common(const char *filename, current->fs->in_exec = 0; current->in_execve = 0; acct_update_integrals(current); + task_numa_free(current); free_bprm(bprm); if (displaced) put_files_struct(displaced); diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index 17eb13f..5315607 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -1448,6 +1448,7 @@ struct task_struct { extern void task_numa_fault(int last_node, int node, int pages, int flags); extern pid_t task_numa_group_id(struct task_struct *p); extern void set_numabalancing_state(bool enabled); +extern void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p); #else static inline void task_numa_fault(int last_node, int node, int pages, int flags) @@ -1460,6 +1461,9 @@ static inline pid_t task_numa_group_id(struct task_struct *p) static inline void set_numabalancing_state(bool enabled) { } +static inline void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p) +{ +} #endif static inline struct pid *task_pid(struct task_struct *task) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index f9070f2..d5873e5 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -1418,6 +1418,7 @@ void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p) { struct numa_group *grp = p->numa_group; int i; + void *numa_faults = p->numa_faults; if (grp) { for (i = 0; i < 2*nr_node_ids; i++) @@ -1433,7 +1434,9 @@ void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p) put_numa_group(grp); } - kfree(p->numa_faults); + p->numa_faults = NULL; + p->numa_faults_buffer = NULL; + kfree(numa_faults); } /* @@ -1452,6 +1455,10 @@ void task_numa_fault(int last_cpupid, int node, int pages, int flags) if (!p->mm) return; + /* Do not worry about placement if exiting */ + if (p->state == TASK_DEAD) + return; + /* Allocate buffer to track faults on a per-node basis */ if (unlikely(!p->numa_faults)) { int size = sizeof(*p->numa_faults) * 2 * nr_node_ids; diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 9aab230..13fe790 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -556,11 +556,6 @@ static inline u64 rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq) #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING extern int migrate_task_to(struct task_struct *p, int cpu); extern int migrate_swap(struct task_struct *, struct task_struct *); -extern void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p); -#else /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */ -static inline void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p) -{ -} #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */ #ifdef CONFIG_SMP -- 1.8.4 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org