From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f70.google.com (mail-wm0-f70.google.com [74.125.82.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55B46B025F for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 08:26:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f70.google.com with SMTP id p129so33378788wmp.3 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 05:26:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y70si9847095wme.88.2016.07.22.05.26.21 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Jul 2016 05:26:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mempool: do not consume memory reserves from the reclaim path References: <1468831164-26621-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> <1468831285-27242-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> <20160719135426.GA31229@cmpxchg.org> <20160720081541.GF11249@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160721085202.GC26379@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160721121300.GA21806@cmpxchg.org> <20160721145309.GR26379@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160722063720.GB794@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Vlastimil Babka Message-ID: <15177f2d-cd00-dade-fc25-12a0c241e8f5@suse.cz> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:26:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160722063720.GB794@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner Cc: David Rientjes , linux-mm@kvack.org, Mikulas Patocka , Ondrej Kozina , Tetsuo Handa , Mel Gorman , Neil Brown , Andrew Morton , LKML , dm-devel@redhat.com On 07/22/2016 08:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 21-07-16 16:53:09, Michal Hocko wrote: >> From d64815758c212643cc1750774e2751721685059a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Michal Hocko >> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:40:59 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "mm, mempool: only set __GFP_NOMEMALLOC if there are >> free elements" >> >> This reverts commit f9054c70d28bc214b2857cf8db8269f4f45a5e23. > > I've noticed that Andrew has already picked this one up. Is anybody > against marking it for stable? It would be strange to have different behavior with known regression in 4.6 and 4.7 stables. Actually, there's still time for 4.7 proper? Vlastimil -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org