From: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm/hotplug: skip bad PFNs from pfn_to_online_page()
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:59:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1560524365.5154.21.camel@lca.pw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lfy4ilvj.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 14:28 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> writes:
>
>
> > 1) offline is busted [1]. It looks like test_pages_in_a_zone() missed the
> > same
> > pfn_section_valid() check.
> >
> > 2) powerpc booting is generating endless warnings [2]. In
> > vmemmap_populated() at
> > arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c, I tried to change PAGES_PER_SECTION to
> > PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION, but it alone seems not enough.
> >
>
> Can you check with this change on ppc64. I haven't reviewed this series yet.
> I did limited testing with change . Before merging this I need to go
> through the full series again. The vmemmap poplulate on ppc64 needs to
> handle two translation mode (hash and radix). With respect to vmemap
> hash doesn't setup a translation in the linux page table. Hence we need
> to make sure we don't try to setup a mapping for a range which is
> arleady convered by an existing mapping.
It works fine.
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> index a4e17a979e45..15c342f0a543 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -88,16 +88,23 @@ static unsigned long __meminit
> vmemmap_section_start(unsigned long page)
> * which overlaps this vmemmap page is initialised then this page is
> * initialised already.
> */
> -static int __meminit vmemmap_populated(unsigned long start, int page_size)
> +static bool __meminit vmemmap_populated(unsigned long start, int page_size)
> {
> unsigned long end = start + page_size;
> start = (unsigned long)(pfn_to_page(vmemmap_section_start(start)));
>
> - for (; start < end; start += (PAGES_PER_SECTION * sizeof(struct
> page)))
> - if (pfn_valid(page_to_pfn((struct page *)start)))
> - return 1;
> + for (; start < end; start += (PAGES_PER_SECTION * sizeof(struct
> page))) {
>
> - return 0;
> + struct mem_section *ms;
> + unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn((struct page *)start);
> +
> + if (pfn_to_section_nr(pfn) >= NR_MEM_SECTIONS)
> + return 0;
> + ms = __nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn));
> + if (valid_section(ms))
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> }
>
> /*
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-14 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 19:15 [PATCH -next] mm/hotplug: skip bad PFNs from pfn_to_online_page() Qian Cai
2019-06-12 19:37 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-12 19:38 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-12 21:47 ` Qian Cai
2019-06-12 21:52 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-12 23:13 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-13 0:06 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-14 8:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-06-14 14:59 ` Qian Cai [this message]
2019-06-14 18:03 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-14 18:57 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-14 19:40 ` Qian Cai
2019-06-14 19:48 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-14 20:43 ` Qian Cai
2019-06-16 15:42 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-17 2:25 ` Qian Cai
2019-06-14 15:35 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-06-14 16:18 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-06-14 16:22 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-14 16:26 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-06-14 16:36 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-14 16:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-06-14 16:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-06-14 17:08 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-06-14 17:14 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-14 17:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-06-16 3:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-06-17 17:21 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-13 18:42 ` Qian Cai
2019-06-14 1:17 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-14 1:29 ` Qian Cai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1560524365.5154.21.camel@lca.pw \
--to=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).