linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
To: n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm/memory-failure: Poison read receives SIGKILL instead of SIGBUS if mmaped more than once
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:33:23 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1564007603-9655-2-git-send-email-jane.chu@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1564007603-9655-1-git-send-email-jane.chu@oracle.com>

Mmap /dev/dax more than once, then read the poison location using address
from one of the mappings. The other mappings due to not having the page
mapped in will cause SIGKILLs delivered to the process. SIGKILL succeeds
over SIGBUS, so user process looses the opportunity to handle the UE.

Although one may add MAP_POPULATE to mmap(2) to work around the issue,
MAP_POPULATE makes mapping 128GB of pmem several magnitudes slower, so
isn't always an option.

Details -

ndctl inject-error --block=10 --count=1 namespace6.0

./read_poison -x dax6.0 -o 5120 -m 2
mmaped address 0x7f5bb6600000
mmaped address 0x7f3cf3600000
doing local read at address 0x7f3cf3601400
Killed

Console messages in instrumented kernel -

mce: Uncorrected hardware memory error in user-access at edbe201400
Memory failure: tk->addr = 7f5bb6601000
Memory failure: address edbe201: call dev_pagemap_mapping_shift
dev_pagemap_mapping_shift: page edbe201: no PUD
Memory failure: tk->size_shift == 0
Memory failure: Unable to find user space address edbe201 in read_poison
Memory failure: tk->addr = 7f3cf3601000
Memory failure: address edbe201: call dev_pagemap_mapping_shift
Memory failure: tk->size_shift = 21
Memory failure: 0xedbe201: forcibly killing read_poison:22434 because of failure to unmap corrupted page
  => to deliver SIGKILL
Memory failure: 0xedbe201: Killing read_poison:22434 due to hardware memory corruption
  => to deliver SIGBUS

Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
---
 mm/memory-failure.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index d9cc660..bd4db33 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ struct to_kill {
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
 	unsigned long addr;
 	short size_shift;
-	char addr_valid;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -304,43 +303,43 @@ static unsigned long dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(struct page *page,
 /*
  * Schedule a process for later kill.
  * Uses GFP_ATOMIC allocations to avoid potential recursions in the VM.
- * TBD would GFP_NOIO be enough?
  */
 static void add_to_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, struct page *p,
 		       struct vm_area_struct *vma,
-		       struct list_head *to_kill,
-		       struct to_kill **tkc)
+		       struct list_head *to_kill)
 {
 	struct to_kill *tk;
 
-	if (*tkc) {
-		tk = *tkc;
-		*tkc = NULL;
-	} else {
-		tk = kmalloc(sizeof(struct to_kill), GFP_ATOMIC);
-		if (!tk) {
-			pr_err("Memory failure: Out of memory while machine check handling\n");
-			return;
-		}
+	tk = kmalloc(sizeof(struct to_kill), GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (!tk) {
+		pr_err("Memory failure: Out of memory while machine check handling\n");
+		return;
 	}
+
 	tk->addr = page_address_in_vma(p, vma);
-	tk->addr_valid = 1;
 	if (is_zone_device_page(p))
 		tk->size_shift = dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(p, vma);
 	else
 		tk->size_shift = compound_order(compound_head(p)) + PAGE_SHIFT;
 
 	/*
-	 * In theory we don't have to kill when the page was
-	 * munmaped. But it could be also a mremap. Since that's
-	 * likely very rare kill anyways just out of paranoia, but use
-	 * a SIGKILL because the error is not contained anymore.
+	 * Send SIGKILL if "tk->addr == -EFAULT". Also, as
+	 * "tk->size_shift" is always non-zero for !is_zone_device_page(),
+	 * so "tk->size_shift == 0" effectively checks no mapping on
+	 * ZONE_DEVICE. Indeed, when a devdax page is mmapped N times
+	 * to a process' address space, it's possible not all N VMAs
+	 * contain mappings for the page, but at least one VMA does.
+	 * Only deliver SIGBUS with payload derived from the VMA that
+	 * has a mapping for the page.
 	 */
-	if (tk->addr == -EFAULT || tk->size_shift == 0) {
+	if (tk->addr == -EFAULT) {
 		pr_info("Memory failure: Unable to find user space address %lx in %s\n",
 			page_to_pfn(p), tsk->comm);
-		tk->addr_valid = 0;
+	} else if (tk->size_shift == 0) {
+		kfree(tk);
+		return;
 	}
+
 	get_task_struct(tsk);
 	tk->tsk = tsk;
 	list_add_tail(&tk->nd, to_kill);
@@ -366,7 +365,7 @@ static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill, bool fail,
 			 * make sure the process doesn't catch the
 			 * signal and then access the memory. Just kill it.
 			 */
-			if (fail || tk->addr_valid == 0) {
+			if (fail || tk->addr == -EFAULT) {
 				pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: forcibly killing %s:%d because of failure to unmap corrupted page\n",
 				       pfn, tk->tsk->comm, tk->tsk->pid);
 				do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_PRIV,
@@ -432,7 +431,7 @@ static struct task_struct *task_early_kill(struct task_struct *tsk,
  * Collect processes when the error hit an anonymous page.
  */
 static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
-			      struct to_kill **tkc, int force_early)
+				int force_early)
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -457,7 +456,7 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
 			if (!page_mapped_in_vma(page, vma))
 				continue;
 			if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm)
-				add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill, tkc);
+				add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill);
 		}
 	}
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
@@ -468,7 +467,7 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
  * Collect processes when the error hit a file mapped page.
  */
 static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
-			      struct to_kill **tkc, int force_early)
+				int force_early)
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -492,7 +491,7 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
 			 * to be informed of all such data corruptions.
 			 */
 			if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm)
-				add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill, tkc);
+				add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill);
 		}
 	}
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
@@ -501,26 +500,17 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
 
 /*
  * Collect the processes who have the corrupted page mapped to kill.
- * This is done in two steps for locking reasons.
- * First preallocate one tokill structure outside the spin locks,
- * so that we can kill at least one process reasonably reliable.
  */
 static void collect_procs(struct page *page, struct list_head *tokill,
 				int force_early)
 {
-	struct to_kill *tk;
-
 	if (!page->mapping)
 		return;
 
-	tk = kmalloc(sizeof(struct to_kill), GFP_NOIO);
-	if (!tk)
-		return;
 	if (PageAnon(page))
-		collect_procs_anon(page, tokill, &tk, force_early);
+		collect_procs_anon(page, tokill, force_early);
 	else
-		collect_procs_file(page, tokill, &tk, force_early);
-	kfree(tk);
+		collect_procs_file(page, tokill, force_early);
 }
 
 static const char *action_name[] = {
-- 
1.8.3.1


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-24 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-24 22:33 [PATCH v2 0/1] mm/memory-failure: Poison read receives SIGKILL instead of SIGBUS issue Jane Chu
2019-07-24 22:33 ` Jane Chu [this message]
2019-07-24 23:43   ` [PATCH v2 1/1] mm/memory-failure: Poison read receives SIGKILL instead of SIGBUS if mmaped more than once Naoya Horiguchi
2019-07-25  5:46     ` Jane Chu
2019-07-24 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] mm/memory-failure: Poison read receives SIGKILL instead of SIGBUS issue Dan Williams
2019-07-25  5:39   ` Jane Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1564007603-9655-2-git-send-email-jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --to=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).