From: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
tglx@linutronix.de, thgarnie@google.com, tytso@mit.edu,
cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slub: fix a deadlock in shuffle_freelist()
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:18:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1569424727.5576.221.camel@lca.pw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190925093153.GC4553@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 11:31 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:27:44PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > The commit b7d5dc21072c ("random: add a spinlock_t to struct
> > batched_entropy") insists on acquiring "batched_entropy_u32.lock" in
> > get_random_u32() which introduced the lock chain,
> >
> > "&rq->lock --> batched_entropy_u32.lock"
> >
> > even after crng init. As the result, it could result in deadlock below.
> > Fix it by using get_random_bytes() in shuffle_freelist() which does not
> > need to take on the batched_entropy locks.
> >
> > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> > 5.3.0-rc7-mm1+ #3 Tainted: G L
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> > make/7937 is trying to acquire lock:
> > ffff900012f225f8 (random_write_wait.lock){....}, at:
> > __wake_up_common_lock+0xa8/0x11c
> >
> > but task is already holding lock:
> > ffff0096b9429c00 (batched_entropy_u32.lock){-.-.}, at:
> > get_random_u32+0x6c/0x1dc
> >
> > which lock already depends on the new lock.
> >
> > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> >
> > -> #3 (batched_entropy_u32.lock){-.-.}:
> > lock_acquire+0x31c/0x360
> > _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x7c/0x9c
> > get_random_u32+0x6c/0x1dc
> > new_slab+0x234/0x6c0
> > ___slab_alloc+0x3c8/0x650
> > kmem_cache_alloc+0x4b0/0x590
> > __debug_object_init+0x778/0x8b4
> > debug_object_init+0x40/0x50
> > debug_init+0x30/0x29c
> > hrtimer_init+0x30/0x50
> > init_dl_task_timer+0x24/0x44
> > __sched_fork+0xc0/0x168
> > init_idle+0x78/0x26c
> > fork_idle+0x12c/0x178
> > idle_threads_init+0x108/0x178
> > smp_init+0x20/0x1bc
> > kernel_init_freeable+0x198/0x26c
> > kernel_init+0x18/0x334
> > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
> >
> > -> #2 (&rq->lock){-.-.}:
>
> This relation is silly..
>
> I suspect the below 'works'...
Unfortunately, the relation is still there,
copy_process()->rt_mutex_init_task()->"&p->pi_lock"
[24438.676716][ T2] -> #2 (&rq->lock){-.-.}:
[24438.676727][ T2] __lock_acquire+0x5b4/0xbf0
[24438.676736][ T2] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[24438.676754][ T2] _raw_spin_lock+0x54/0x80
[24438.676771][ T2] task_fork_fair+0x60/0x190
[24438.676788][ T2] sched_fork+0x128/0x270
[24438.676806][ T2] copy_process+0x7a4/0x1bf0
[24438.676823][ T2] _do_fork+0xac/0xac0
[24438.676841][ T2] kernel_thread+0x70/0xa0
[24438.676858][ T2] rest_init+0x4c/0x42c
[24438.676884][ T2] start_kernel+0x778/0x7c0
[24438.676902][ T2] start_here_common+0x1c/0x334
Whole thing,
[24438.675704][ T2] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[24438.675714][ T2] 5.3.0-next-20190924 #2 Not tainted
[24438.675722][ T2] ------------------------------------------------------
[24438.675731][ T2] kthreadd/2 is trying to acquire lock:
[24438.675740][ T2] c0000000010a7450 (random_write_wait.lock){..-.}, at:
__wake_up_common_lock+0x88/0x110
[24438.675768][ T2]
[24438.675768][ T2] but task is already holding lock:
[24438.675778][ T2] c000001ffd2f06e0 (batched_entropy_u64.lock){-...}, at:
get_random_u64+0x60/0x100
[24438.675803][ T2]
[24438.675803][ T2] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[24438.675803][ T2]
[24438.675816][ T2]
[24438.675816][ T2] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[24438.675836][ T2]
[24438.675836][ T2] -> #4 (batched_entropy_u64.lock){-...}:
[24438.675860][ T2] __lock_acquire+0x5b4/0xbf0
[24438.675878][ T2] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[24438.675906][ T2] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x70/0xa0
[24438.675923][ T2] get_random_u64+0x60/0x100
[24438.675944][ T2] add_to_free_area_random+0x164/0x1b0
[24438.675962][ T2] free_one_page+0xb24/0xcf0
[24438.675980][ T2] __free_pages_ok+0x448/0xbf0
[24438.675999][ T2] deferred_init_maxorder+0x404/0x4a4
[24438.676018][ T2] deferred_grow_zone+0x158/0x1f0
[24438.676035][ T2] get_page_from_freelist+0x1dc8/0x1e10
[24438.676063][ T2] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1d8/0x1940
[24438.676083][ T2] allocate_slab+0x130/0x2740
[24438.676091][ T2] new_slab+0xa8/0xe0
[24438.676101][ T2] kmem_cache_open+0x254/0x660
[24438.676119][ T2] __kmem_cache_create+0x44/0x2a0
[24438.676136][ T2] create_boot_cache+0xcc/0x110
[24438.676154][ T2] kmem_cache_init+0x90/0x1f0
[24438.676173][ T2] start_kernel+0x3b8/0x7c0
[24438.676191][ T2] start_here_common+0x1c/0x334
[24438.676208][ T2]
[24438.676208][ T2] -> #3 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){-.-.}:
[24438.676221][ T2] __lock_acquire+0x5b4/0xbf0
[24438.676247][ T2] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[24438.676264][ T2] _raw_spin_lock+0x54/0x80
[24438.676282][ T2] rmqueue_bulk.constprop.23+0x64/0xf20
[24438.676300][ T2] get_page_from_freelist+0x718/0x1e10
[24438.676319][ T2] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1d8/0x1940
[24438.676339][ T2] alloc_page_interleave+0x34/0x170
[24438.676356][ T2] allocate_slab+0xd1c/0x2740
[24438.676374][ T2] new_slab+0xa8/0xe0
[24438.676391][ T2] ___slab_alloc+0x580/0xef0
[24438.676408][ T2] __slab_alloc+0x64/0xd0
[24438.676426][ T2] kmem_cache_alloc+0x5c4/0x6c0
[24438.676444][ T2] fill_pool+0x280/0x540
[24438.676461][ T2] __debug_object_init+0x60/0x6b0
[24438.676479][ T2] hrtimer_init+0x5c/0x310
[24438.676497][ T2] init_dl_task_timer+0x34/0x60
[24438.676516][ T2] __sched_fork+0x8c/0x110
[24438.676535][ T2] init_idle+0xb4/0x3c0
[24438.676553][ T2] idle_thread_get+0x78/0x120
[24438.676572][ T2] bringup_cpu+0x30/0x230
[24438.676590][ T2] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x190/0x1580
[24438.676618][ T2] do_cpu_up+0x248/0x460
[24438.676636][ T2] smp_init+0x118/0x1c0
[24438.676662][ T2] kernel_init_freeable+0x3f8/0x8dc
[24438.676681][ T2] kernel_init+0x2c/0x154
[24438.676699][ T2] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74
[24438.676716][ T2]
[24438.676716][ T2] -> #2 (&rq->lock){-.-.}:
[24438.676727][ T2] __lock_acquire+0x5b4/0xbf0
[24438.676736][ T2] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[24438.676754][ T2] _raw_spin_lock+0x54/0x80
[24438.676771][ T2] task_fork_fair+0x60/0x190
[24438.676788][ T2] sched_fork+0x128/0x270
[24438.676806][ T2] copy_process+0x7a4/0x1bf0
[24438.676823][ T2] _do_fork+0xac/0xac0
[24438.676841][ T2] kernel_thread+0x70/0xa0
[24438.676858][ T2] rest_init+0x4c/0x42c
[24438.676884][ T2] start_kernel+0x778/0x7c0
[24438.676902][ T2] start_here_common+0x1c/0x334
[24438.676910][ T2]
[24438.676910][ T2] -> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}:
[24438.676921][ T2] __lock_acquire+0x5b4/0xbf0
[24438.676929][ T2] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[24438.676947][ T2] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x70/0xa0
[24438.676973][ T2] try_to_wake_up+0x70/0x1600
[24438.676991][ T2] pollwake+0x88/0xc0
[24438.677009][ T2] __wake_up_common+0xec/0x280
[24438.677026][ T2] __wake_up_common_lock+0xac/0x110
[24438.677044][ T2] account.constprop.8+0x284/0x430
[24438.677061][ T2] extract_entropy.constprop.7+0xd4/0x330
[24438.677080][ T2] _xfer_secondary_pool+0x104/0x3e0
[24438.677097][ T2] push_to_pool+0x58/0x310
[24438.677116][ T2] process_one_work+0x300/0x8e0
[24438.677133][ T2] worker_thread+0x78/0x530
[24438.677151][ T2] kthread+0x1a8/0x1b0
[24438.677180][ T2] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74
[24438.677245][ T2]
[24438.677245][ T2] -> #0 (random_write_wait.lock){..-.}:
[24438.677329][ T2] check_prev_add+0x100/0x11b0
[24438.677377][ T2] validate_chain+0x868/0x1530
[24438.677446][ T2] __lock_acquire+0x5b4/0xbf0
[24438.677516][ T2] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[24438.677563][ T2] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x70/0xa0
[24438.677618][ T2] __wake_up_common_lock+0x88/0x110
[24438.677678][ T2] account.constprop.8+0x284/0x430
[24438.677743][ T2] extract_entropy.constprop.7+0xd4/0x330
[24438.677802][ T2] crng_reseed+0x68/0x490
[24438.677867][ T2] _extract_crng+0x104/0x110
[24438.677914][ T2] crng_reseed+0x284/0x490
[24438.677983][ T2] _extract_crng+0x104/0x110
[24438.678032][ T2] get_random_u64+0xdc/0x100
[24438.678101][ T2] copy_process+0x2d8/0x1bf0
[24438.678148][ T2] _do_fork+0xac/0xac0
[24438.678208][ T2] kernel_thread+0x70/0xa0
[24438.678246][ T2] kthreadd+0x270/0x330
[24438.678301][ T2] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74
[24438.678342][ T2]
[24438.678342][ T2] other info that might help us debug this:
[24438.678342][ T2]
[24438.678459][ T2] Chain exists of:
[24438.678459][ T2] random_write_wait.lock --> &(&zone->lock)->rlock -->
batched_entropy_u64.lock
[24438.678459][ T2]
[24438.678636][ T2] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[24438.678636][ T2]
[24438.678692][ T2] CPU0 CPU1
[24438.678754][ T2] ---- ----
[24438.678814][ T2] lock(batched_entropy_u64.lock);
[24438.678878][ T2] lock(&(&zone->lock)-
>rlock);
[24438.678951][ T2] lock(batched_entropy_u64.l
ock);
[24438.679038][ T2] lock(random_write_wait.lock);
[24438.679098][ T2]
[24438.679098][ T2] *** DEADLOCK ***
[24438.679098][ T2]
[24438.679174][ T2] 1 lock held by kthreadd/2:
[24438.679230][ T2] #0: c000001ffd2f06e0 (batched_entropy_u64.lock){-...},
at: get_random_u64+0x60/0x100
[24438.679341][ T2]
[24438.679341][ T2] stack backtrace:
[24438.679413][ T2] CPU: 13 PID: 2 Comm: kthreadd Not tainted 5.3.0-next-
20190924 #2
[24438.679485][ T2] Call Trace:
[24438.679507][ T2] [c00000002c84efe0] [c00000000091a574]
dump_stack+0xe8/0x164 (unreliable)
[24438.679618][ T2] [c00000002c84f030] [c0000000001cc9b8]
print_circular_bug+0x3a8/0x420
[24438.679701][ T2] [c00000002c84f0e0] [c0000000001ccc90]
check_noncircular+0x260/0x320
[24438.679769][ T2] [c00000002c84f1e0] [c0000000001ce7e0]
check_prev_add+0x100/0x11b0
[24438.679868][ T2] [c00000002c84f2c0] [c0000000001d00f8]
validate_chain+0x868/0x1530
[24438.679950][ T2] [c00000002c84f3f0] [c0000000001d3064]
__lock_acquire+0x5b4/0xbf0
[24438.680059][ T2] [c00000002c84f4f0] [c0000000001d3ed0]
lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[24438.680122][ T2] [c00000002c84f5d0] [c000000000947d70]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x70/0xa0
[24438.680207][ T2] [c00000002c84f610] [c0000000001a9488]
__wake_up_common_lock+0x88/0x110
[24438.680298][ T2] [c00000002c84f690] [c0000000006f11a4]
account.constprop.8+0x284/0x430
[24438.680399][ T2] [c00000002c84f750] [c0000000006f1554]
extract_entropy.constprop.7+0xd4/0x330
[24438.680495][ T2] [c00000002c84f7d0] [c0000000006f1818]
crng_reseed+0x68/0x490
[24438.680590][ T2] [c00000002c84f910] [c0000000006f4094]
_extract_crng+0x104/0x110
[24438.680662][ T2] [c00000002c84f950] [c0000000006f1a34]
crng_reseed+0x284/0x490
[24438.680751][ T2] [c00000002c84fa90] [c0000000006f4094]
_extract_crng+0x104/0x110
[24438.680828][ T2] [c00000002c84fad0] [c0000000006f4c0c]
get_random_u64+0xdc/0x100
[24438.680931][ T2] [c00000002c84fb10] [c000000000106988]
copy_process+0x2d8/0x1bf0
[24438.681007][ T2] [c00000002c84fc30] [c00000000010861c] _do_fork+0xac/0xac0
[24438.681074][ T2] [c00000002c84fd10] [c0000000001090d0]
kernel_thread+0x70/0xa0
[24438.681170][ T2] [c00000002c84fd80] [c0000000001518f0]
kthreadd+0x270/0x330
[24438.681257][ T2] [c00000002c84fe20] [c00000000000b748]
ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 63900ca029e0..ec1d72f18b34 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6027,10 +6027,11 @@ void init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu)
> struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + __sched_fork(0, idle);
> +
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&idle->pi_lock, flags);
> raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
>
> - __sched_fork(0, idle);
> idle->state = TASK_RUNNING;
> idle->se.exec_start = sched_clock();
> idle->flags |= PF_IDLE;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-25 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-13 16:27 [PATCH] mm/slub: fix a deadlock in shuffle_freelist() Qian Cai
2019-09-16 9:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-16 14:01 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-16 19:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-16 21:31 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-17 7:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-18 19:59 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-25 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-25 15:18 ` Qian Cai [this message]
2019-09-25 16:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-26 12:29 ` Qian Cai
2019-10-01 9:18 ` [PATCH] sched: Avoid spurious lock dependencies Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-01 10:01 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-01 11:22 ` Qian Cai
2019-10-01 11:36 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2019-10-01 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-29 11:10 ` Qian Cai
2019-10-29 12:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-12 0:54 ` Qian Cai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1569424727.5576.221.camel@lca.pw \
--to=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).