From: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V14] mm/debug: Add tests validating architecture page table helpers
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:40:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1583178042.7365.146.camel@lca.pw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1582732318.7365.129.camel@lca.pw>
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 10:51 -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 15:45 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >
> > Le 26/02/2020 à 15:09, Qian Cai a écrit :
> > > On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 08:47 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > > > This adds tests which will validate architecture page table helpers and
> > > > other accessors in their compliance with expected generic MM semantics.
> > > > This will help various architectures in validating changes to existing
> > > > page table helpers or addition of new ones.
> > > >
> > > > This test covers basic page table entry transformations including but not
> > > > limited to old, young, dirty, clean, write, write protect etc at various
> > > > level along with populating intermediate entries with next page table page
> > > > and validating them.
> > > >
> > > > Test page table pages are allocated from system memory with required size
> > > > and alignments. The mapped pfns at page table levels are derived from a
> > > > real pfn representing a valid kernel text symbol. This test gets called
> > > > inside kernel_init() right after async_synchronize_full().
> > > >
> > > > This test gets built and run when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE is selected. Any
> > > > architecture, which is willing to subscribe this test will need to select
> > > > ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE. For now this is limited to arc, arm64, x86, s390
> > > > and ppc32 platforms where the test is known to build and run successfully.
> > > > Going forward, other architectures too can subscribe the test after fixing
> > > > any build or runtime problems with their page table helpers. Meanwhile for
> > > > better platform coverage, the test can also be enabled with CONFIG_EXPERT
> > > > even without ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE.
> > > >
> > > > Folks interested in making sure that a given platform's page table helpers
> > > > conform to expected generic MM semantics should enable the above config
> > > > which will just trigger this test during boot. Any non conformity here will
> > > > be reported as an warning which would need to be fixed. This test will help
> > > > catch any changes to the agreed upon semantics expected from generic MM and
> > > > enable platforms to accommodate it thereafter.
> > >
> > > How useful is this that straightly crash the powerpc?
> > >
> > > [ 23.263425][ T1] debug_vm_pgtable: debug_vm_pgtable: Validating
> > > architecture page table helpers
> > > [ 23.263625][ T1] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [ 23.263649][ T1] kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:274!
> >
> > The problem on PPC64 is known and has to be investigated and fixed.
>
> It might be interesting to hear what powerpc64 maintainers would say about it
> and if it is actually worth "fixing" in the arch code, but that BUG_ON() was
> there since 2009 and had not been exposed until this patch comes alone?
This patch below makes it works on powerpc64 in order to dodge the BUG_ON()s in
assert_pte_locked() triggered by pte_clear_tests().
diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
index 96dd7d574cef..50b385233971 100644
--- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
+++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@
#define RANDOM_ORVALUE GENMASK(BITS_PER_LONG - 1, S390_MASK_BITS)
#define RANDOM_NZVALUE GENMASK(7, 0)
+unsigned long vaddr;
+
static void __init pte_basic_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
{
pte_t pte = pfn_pte(pfn, prot);
@@ -256,7 +258,7 @@ static void __init pte_clear_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
pte_t *ptep)
pte = __pte(pte_val(pte) | RANDOM_ORVALUE);
WRITE_ONCE(*ptep, pte);
- pte_clear(mm, 0, ptep);
+ pte_clear(mm, vaddr, ptep);
pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
WARN_ON(!pte_none(pte));
}
@@ -310,8 +312,9 @@ void __init debug_vm_pgtable(void)
pgtable_t saved_ptep;
pgprot_t prot;
phys_addr_t paddr;
- unsigned long vaddr, pte_aligned, pmd_aligned;
+ unsigned long pte_aligned, pmd_aligned;
unsigned long pud_aligned, p4d_aligned, pgd_aligned;
+ spinlock_t *ptl;
pr_info("Validating architecture page table helpers\n");
prot = vm_get_page_prot(VMFLAGS);
@@ -344,7 +347,7 @@ void __init debug_vm_pgtable(void)
p4dp = p4d_alloc(mm, pgdp, vaddr);
pudp = pud_alloc(mm, p4dp, vaddr);
pmdp = pmd_alloc(mm, pudp, vaddr);
- ptep = pte_alloc_map(mm, pmdp, vaddr);
+ ptep = pte_alloc_map_lock(mm, pmdp, vaddr, &ptl);
/*
* Save all the page table page addresses as the page table
@@ -370,7 +373,7 @@ void __init debug_vm_pgtable(void)
p4d_clear_tests(mm, p4dp);
pgd_clear_tests(mm, pgdp);
- pte_unmap(ptep);
+ pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
pmd_populate_tests(mm, pmdp, saved_ptep);
pud_populate_tests(mm, pudp, saved_pmdp);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-02 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-17 3:17 [PATCH V14] mm/debug: Add tests validating architecture page table helpers Anshuman Khandual
2020-02-24 1:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-02-26 14:09 ` Qian Cai
2020-02-26 14:12 ` Qian Cai
2020-02-26 14:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-02-27 2:34 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-02-27 4:03 ` Andrew Morton
2020-02-27 4:07 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-02-26 14:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-02-26 15:51 ` Qian Cai
2020-03-02 19:40 ` Qian Cai [this message]
2020-03-03 5:55 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-03-04 1:39 ` Qian Cai
2020-03-04 6:48 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-03-04 11:29 ` Qian Cai
2020-03-05 0:54 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-03-05 5:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-03-05 6:23 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-03-03 5:59 ` Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1583178042.7365.146.camel@lca.pw \
--to=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).