From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Borislav\
Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Zefan Li" <lizefan@huawei.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Thomas\
Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/12] mm: HUGE_VMAP arch support cleanup
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:45:48 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1598049779.exwra3cjwe.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200821131422.110abb1a0c0b6a9d378b0e48@linux-foundation.org>
Excerpts from Andrew Morton's message of August 22, 2020 6:14 am:
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 01:12:09 +1000 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This changes the awkward approach where architectures provide init
>> functions to determine which levels they can provide large mappings for,
>> to one where the arch is queried for each call.
>>
>> This removes code and indirection, and allows constant-folding of dead
>> code for unsupported levels.
>>
>> This also adds a prot argument to the arch query. This is unused
>> currently but could help with some architectures (e.g., some powerpc
>> processors can't map uncacheable memory with large pages).
>>
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/vmalloc.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/vmalloc.h
>> @@ -1,4 +1,12 @@
>> #ifndef _ASM_ARM64_VMALLOC_H
>> #define _ASM_ARM64_VMALLOC_H
>>
>> +#include <asm/page.h>
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
>> +bool arch_vmap_p4d_supported(pgprot_t prot);
>> +bool arch_vmap_pud_supported(pgprot_t prot);
>> +bool arch_vmap_pmd_supported(pgprot_t prot);
>> +#endif
>
> Moving these out of generic code and into multiple arch headers is
> unfortunate. Can we leave them in include/linux/somewhere? And remove
> the ifdefs, if so inclined - they just move the build error from
> link-time to compile-time, and such an error shouldn't occur!
Yeah this was just an intermediate step as you saw. It's a bit
unfortunate, but I thought it made the arch changes clearer.
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-21 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-21 15:12 [PATCH v6 00/12] huge vmalloc mappings Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] mm/vmalloc: fix vmalloc_to_page for huge vmap mappings Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 20:07 ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-21 22:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] mm: apply_to_pte_range warn and fail if a large pte is encountered Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] mm/vmalloc: rename vmap_*_range vmap_pages_*_range Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] mm/ioremap: rename ioremap_*_range to vmap_*_range Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] mm: HUGE_VMAP arch support cleanup Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 20:14 ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-21 22:45 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] powerpc: inline huge vmap supported functions Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 20:15 ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] arm64: " Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] x86: " Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] mm: Move vmap_range from mm/ioremap.c to mm/vmalloc.c Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] mm/vmalloc: add vmap_range_noflush variant Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] mm/vmalloc: Hugepage vmalloc mappings Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-08-21 16:05 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] powerpc/64s/radix: Enable huge " Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1598049779.exwra3cjwe.astroid@bobo.none \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).