From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9345CC433E1 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E11E20706 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:56:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4E11E20706 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 1B23E8D000E; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 1166E8D000D; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A122F8D000E; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0143.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.143]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523848D000D for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin14.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100C4181AEF1A for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:55:31 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77185458462.14.cough31_36181cf27053 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B1318229818 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:55:30 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: cough31_36181cf27053 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 8898 Received: from out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.44]) by imf19.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:55:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R961e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e01353;MF=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=24;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0U6k9-bl_1598273712; Received: from aliy80.localdomain(mailfrom:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0U6k9-bl_1598273712) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:55:20 +0800 From: Alex Shi To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, rong.a.chen@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, shy828301@gmail.com Cc: Alexander Duyck , Thomas Gleixner , Andrey Ryabinin Subject: [PATCH v18 21/32] mm/lru: introduce the relock_page_lruvec function Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:54:54 +0800 Message-Id: <1598273705-69124-22-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1598273705-69124-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> References: <1598273705-69124-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C2B1318229818 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Alexander Duyck Use this new function to replace repeated same code, no func change. When testing for relock we can avoid the need for RCU locking if we simply compare the page pgdat and memcg pointers versus those that the lruvec is holding. By doing this we can avoid the extra pointer walks and accesses of the memory cgroup. In addition we can avoid the checks entirely if lruvec is currently NULL. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck Signed-off-by: Alex Shi Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: Hugh Dickins Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org --- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/mlock.c | 9 +------- mm/swap.c | 33 +++++++---------------------- mm/vmscan.c | 8 +------ 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h index 7b170e9028b5..ee6ef2d8ad52 100644 --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h @@ -488,6 +488,22 @@ static inline struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_lruvec(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(struct page *, struct pglist_data *); +static inline bool lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock(struct page *page, + struct lruvec *lruvec) +{ + pg_data_t *pgdat = page_pgdat(page); + const struct mem_cgroup *memcg; + struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz; + + if (mem_cgroup_disabled()) + return lruvec == &pgdat->__lruvec; + + mz = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_node, lruvec); + memcg = page->mem_cgroup ? : root_mem_cgroup; + + return lruvec->pgdat == pgdat && mz->memcg == memcg; +} + struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *p); struct mem_cgroup *get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(struct mm_struct *mm); @@ -1023,6 +1039,14 @@ static inline struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(struct page *page, return &pgdat->__lruvec; } +static inline bool lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock(struct page *page, + struct lruvec *lruvec) +{ + pg_data_t *pgdat = page_pgdat(page); + + return lruvec == &pgdat->__lruvec; +} + static inline struct mem_cgroup *parent_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { return NULL; @@ -1469,6 +1493,34 @@ static inline void unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(struct lruvec *lruvec, spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lruvec->lru_lock, flags); } +/* Don't lock again iff page's lruvec locked */ +static inline struct lruvec *relock_page_lruvec_irq(struct page *page, + struct lruvec *locked_lruvec) +{ + if (locked_lruvec) { + if (lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock(page, locked_lruvec)) + return locked_lruvec; + + unlock_page_lruvec_irq(locked_lruvec); + } + + return lock_page_lruvec_irq(page); +} + +/* Don't lock again iff page's lruvec locked */ +static inline struct lruvec *relock_page_lruvec_irqsave(struct page *page, + struct lruvec *locked_lruvec, unsigned long *flags) +{ + if (locked_lruvec) { + if (lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock(page, locked_lruvec)) + return locked_lruvec; + + unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked_lruvec, *flags); + } + + return lock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, flags); +} + #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK struct wb_domain *mem_cgroup_wb_domain(struct bdi_writeback *wb); diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c index 177d2588e863..0448409184e3 100644 --- a/mm/mlock.c +++ b/mm/mlock.c @@ -302,17 +302,10 @@ static void __munlock_pagevec(struct pagevec *pvec, struct zone *zone) /* Phase 1: page isolation */ for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) { struct page *page = pvec->pages[i]; - struct lruvec *new_lruvec; /* block memcg change in mem_cgroup_move_account */ lock_page_memcg(page); - new_lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, page_pgdat(page)); - if (new_lruvec != lruvec) { - if (lruvec) - unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec); - lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irq(page); - } - + lruvec = relock_page_lruvec_irq(page, lruvec); if (TestClearPageMlocked(page)) { /* * We already have pin from follow_page_mask() diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c index b67959b701c0..2ac78e8fab71 100644 --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -209,19 +209,12 @@ static void pagevec_lru_move_fn(struct pagevec *pvec, for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) { struct page *page = pvec->pages[i]; - struct lruvec *new_lruvec; /* block memcg migration during page moving between lru */ if (!TestClearPageLRU(page)) continue; - new_lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, page_pgdat(page)); - if (lruvec != new_lruvec) { - if (lruvec) - unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags); - lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, &flags); - } - + lruvec = relock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, lruvec, &flags); (*move_fn)(page, lruvec); SetPageLRU(page); @@ -865,17 +858,12 @@ void release_pages(struct page **pages, int nr) } if (PageLRU(page)) { - struct lruvec *new_lruvec; - - new_lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, - page_pgdat(page)); - if (new_lruvec != lruvec) { - if (lruvec) - unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, - flags); + struct lruvec *prev_lruvec = lruvec; + + lruvec = relock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, lruvec, + &flags); + if (prev_lruvec != lruvec) lock_batch = 0; - lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, &flags); - } VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLRU(page), page); __ClearPageLRU(page); @@ -982,15 +970,8 @@ void __pagevec_lru_add(struct pagevec *pvec) for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) { struct page *page = pvec->pages[i]; - struct lruvec *new_lruvec; - - new_lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, page_pgdat(page)); - if (lruvec != new_lruvec) { - if (lruvec) - unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags); - lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, &flags); - } + lruvec = relock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, lruvec, &flags); __pagevec_lru_add_fn(page, lruvec); } if (lruvec) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 789444ae4c88..2c94790d4cb1 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -4280,15 +4280,9 @@ void check_move_unevictable_pages(struct pagevec *pvec) for (i = 0; i < pvec->nr; i++) { struct page *page = pvec->pages[i]; - struct lruvec *new_lruvec; pgscanned++; - new_lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, page_pgdat(page)); - if (lruvec != new_lruvec) { - if (lruvec) - unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec); - lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irq(page); - } + lruvec = relock_page_lruvec_irq(page, lruvec); if (!PageLRU(page) || !PageUnevictable(page)) continue; -- 1.8.3.1