From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7495DC433DF for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C78A2078D for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:56:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1C78A2078D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E81D28D0012; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DE9E68D000D; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BC0998D0013; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0046.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.46]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE178D0012 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6613E1EF1 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:55:34 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77185458588.25.goat17_2b151ff27053 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EAF1804E3A0 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:55:34 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: goat17_2b151ff27053 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 6014 Received: from out30-133.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-133.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.133]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:55:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R371e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e01355;MF=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=23;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0U6k9-bl_1598273712; Received: from aliy80.localdomain(mailfrom:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0U6k9-bl_1598273712) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:55:24 +0800 From: Alex Shi To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, rong.a.chen@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, shy828301@gmail.com Cc: Alexander Duyck , Stephen Rothwell Subject: [PATCH v18 30/32] mm: Drop use of test_and_set_skip in favor of just setting skip Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:55:03 +0800 Message-Id: <1598273705-69124-31-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1598273705-69124-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> References: <1598273705-69124-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 34EAF1804E3A0 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Alexander Duyck The only user of test_and_set_skip was isolate_migratepages_block and it was using it after a call that was testing and clearing the LRU flag. As such it really didn't need to be behind the LRU lock anymore as it wasn't really fulfilling its purpose. Since it is only possible to be able to test and set the skip flag if we were able to obtain the LRU bit for the first page in the pageblock the use of the test_and_set_skip becomes redundant as the LRU flag now becomes the item that limits us to only one thread being able to perform the operation and there being no need for a test_and_set operation. With that being the case we can simply drop the bit and instead directly just call the set_pageblock_skip function if the page we are working on is the valid_page at the start of the pageblock. Then any other threads that enter this pageblock should see the skip bit set on the first valid page in the pageblock. Since we have dropped the late abort case we can drop the code that was clearing the LRU flag and calling page_put since the abort case will now not be holding a reference to a page now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck Signed-off-by: Alex Shi Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org --- mm/compaction.c | 53 +++++++++++++---------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c index a0e48d079124..9443bc4d763d 100644 --- a/mm/compaction.c +++ b/mm/compaction.c @@ -399,29 +399,6 @@ void reset_isolation_suitable(pg_data_t *pgdat) } } -/* - * Sets the pageblock skip bit if it was clear. Note that this is a hint as - * locks are not required for read/writers. Returns true if it was already set. - */ -static bool test_and_set_skip(struct compact_control *cc, struct page *page, - unsigned long pfn) -{ - bool skip; - - /* Do no update if skip hint is being ignored */ - if (cc->ignore_skip_hint) - return false; - - if (!IS_ALIGNED(pfn, pageblock_nr_pages)) - return false; - - skip = get_pageblock_skip(page); - if (!skip && !cc->no_set_skip_hint) - set_pageblock_skip(page); - - return skip; -} - static void update_cached_migrate(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long pfn) { struct zone *zone = cc->zone; @@ -480,12 +457,6 @@ static inline void update_pageblock_skip(struct compact_control *cc, static void update_cached_migrate(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long pfn) { } - -static bool test_and_set_skip(struct compact_control *cc, struct page *page, - unsigned long pfn) -{ - return false; -} #endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */ /* @@ -895,7 +866,6 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(pg_data_t *pgdat) if (!valid_page && IS_ALIGNED(low_pfn, pageblock_nr_pages)) { if (!cc->ignore_skip_hint && get_pageblock_skip(page)) { low_pfn = end_pfn; - page = NULL; goto isolate_abort; } valid_page = page; @@ -1021,11 +991,20 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(pg_data_t *pgdat) lruvec_memcg_debug(lruvec, page); - /* Try get exclusive access under lock */ - if (!skip_updated) { + /* + * Indicate that we want exclusive access to the + * rest of the pageblock. + * + * The LRU flag prevents simultaneous access to the + * first PFN, and the LRU lock helps to prevent + * simultaneous update of multiple pageblocks shared + * in the same bitmap. + */ + if (page == valid_page) { + if (!cc->ignore_skip_hint && + !cc->no_set_skip_hint) + set_pageblock_skip(page); skip_updated = true; - if (test_and_set_skip(cc, page, low_pfn)) - goto isolate_abort; } } @@ -1098,15 +1077,9 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(pg_data_t *pgdat) if (unlikely(low_pfn > end_pfn)) low_pfn = end_pfn; - page = NULL; - isolate_abort: if (lruvec) unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags); - if (page) { - SetPageLRU(page); - put_page(page); - } /* * Updated the cached scanner pfn once the pageblock has been scanned -- 1.8.3.1