linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
	hca@linux.ibm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Pre-validate the address range with platform
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:42:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1610975582-12646-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (raw)

This series adds a mechanism allowing platforms to weigh in and prevalidate
incoming address range before proceeding further with the memory hotplug.
This helps prevent potential platform errors for the given address range,
down the hotplug call chain, which inevitably fails the hotplug itself.

This mechanism was suggested by David Hildenbrand during another discussion
with respect to a memory hotplug fix on arm64 platform.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1600332402-30123-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/

This mechanism focuses on the addressibility aspect and not [sub] section
alignment aspect. Hence check_hotplug_memory_range() and check_pfn_span()
have been left unchanged. Wondering if all these can still be unified in
an expanded memhp_range_allowed() check, that can be called from multiple
memory hot add and remove paths.

This series applies on v5.11-rc4 and has been tested on arm64. But only
build tested on s390.

Changes in V3

- Updated the commit message in [PATCH 1/3]
- Replaced 1 with 'true' and 0 with 'false' in memhp_range_allowed()
- Updated memhp_range.end as VMEM_MAX_PHYS - 1 and updated vmem_add_mapping() on s390
- Changed memhp_range_allowed() behaviour in __add_pages()
- Updated __add_pages() to return E2BIG when memhp_range_allowed() fails for non-linear mapping based requests

Changes in V2:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1608218912-28932-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/

- Changed s390 version per Heiko and updated the commit message
- Called memhp_range_allowed() only for arch_add_memory() in pagemap_range()
- Exported the symbol memhp_get_pluggable_range() 

Changes in V1:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1607400978-31595-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/

- Fixed build problems with (MEMORY_HOTPLUG & !MEMORY_HOTREMOVE)
- Added missing prototype for arch_get_mappable_range()
- Added VM_BUG_ON() check for memhp_range_allowed() in arch_add_memory() per David

Changes in RFC V2:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1606706992-26656-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/

Incorporated all review feedbacks from David.

- Added additional range check in __segment_load() on s390 which was lost
- Changed is_private init in pagemap_range()
- Moved the framework into mm/memory_hotplug.c
- Made arch_get_addressable_range() a __weak function
- Renamed arch_get_addressable_range() as arch_get_mappable_range()
- Callback arch_get_mappable_range() only handles range requiring linear mapping
- Merged multiple memhp_range_allowed() checks in register_memory_resource()
- Replaced WARN() with pr_warn() in memhp_range_allowed()
- Replaced error return code ERANGE with E2BIG

Changes in RFC V1:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1606098529-7907-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/

Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Anshuman Khandual (3):
  mm/memory_hotplug: Prevalidate the address range being added with platform
  arm64/mm: Define arch_get_mappable_range()
  s390/mm: Define arch_get_mappable_range()

David Hildenbrand (1):
  virtio-mem: check against memhp_get_pluggable_range() which memory we can hotplug

 arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c            | 15 +++----
 arch/s390/mm/init.c            |  1 +
 arch/s390/mm/vmem.c            | 15 ++++++-
 drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c    | 40 +++++++++++------
 include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 10 +++++
 mm/memory_hotplug.c            | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 mm/memremap.c                  |  6 +++
 7 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1



             reply	other threads:[~2021-01-18 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-18 13:12 Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2021-01-18 13:12 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Prevalidate the address range being added with platform Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-19 12:21   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-20  8:33     ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-20 10:41       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-20 11:58         ` Oscar Salvador
2021-01-21  9:23       ` Oscar Salvador
2021-01-22  9:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-22 10:41     ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-22 10:42       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-22 10:43         ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-18 13:13 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] arm64/mm: Define arch_get_mappable_range() Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-19 12:24   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-18 13:13 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] s390/mm: " Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-19 12:26   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-20  8:28     ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-20 10:39       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-18 13:13 ` [PATCH RFC] virtio-mem: check against memhp_get_pluggable_range() which memory we can hotplug Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-18 13:21   ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-19 12:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-21  9:57     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-22  3:32       ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-19 13:33 ` [PATCH V3 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Pre-validate the address range with platform David Hildenbrand
2021-01-19 13:40   ` Oscar Salvador
2021-01-20  8:37     ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-22  6:04       ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-22  8:34         ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1610975582-12646-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).