linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	chuck.lever@oracle.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC V2 net-next 2/2] net: page_pool: use alloc_pages_bulk in refill code path
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:29:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <161460539281.3031322.4594417056131578057.stgit@firesoul> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161460522573.3031322.15721946341157092594.stgit@firesoul>

There are cases where the page_pool need to refill with pages from the
page allocator. Some workloads cause the page_pool to release pages
instead of recycling these pages.

For these workload it can improve performance to bulk alloc pages from
the page-allocator to refill the alloc cache.

For XDP-redirect workload with 100G mlx5 driver (that use page_pool)
redirecting xdp_frame packets into a veth, that does XDP_PASS to create
an SKB from the xdp_frame, which then cannot return the page to the
page_pool. In this case, we saw[1] an improvement of 18.8% from using
the alloc_pages_bulk API (3,677,958 pps -> 4,368,926 pps).

[1] https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/mem/page_pool06_alloc_pages_bulk.org

Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
---
 net/core/page_pool.c |   63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
index a26f2ceb6a87..567680bd91c4 100644
--- a/net/core/page_pool.c
+++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
@@ -208,44 +208,61 @@ noinline
 static struct page *__page_pool_alloc_pages_slow(struct page_pool *pool,
 						 gfp_t _gfp)
 {
+	const int bulk = PP_ALLOC_CACHE_REFILL;
+	struct page *page, *next, *first_page;
 	unsigned int pp_flags = pool->p.flags;
-	struct page *page;
+	unsigned int pp_order = pool->p.order;
+	int pp_nid = pool->p.nid;
+	LIST_HEAD(page_list);
 	gfp_t gfp = _gfp;
 
-	/* We could always set __GFP_COMP, and avoid this branch, as
-	 * prep_new_page() can handle order-0 with __GFP_COMP.
-	 */
-	if (pool->p.order)
+	/* Don't support bulk alloc for high-order pages */
+	if (unlikely(pp_order)) {
 		gfp |= __GFP_COMP;
+		first_page = alloc_pages_node(pp_nid, gfp, pp_order);
+		if (unlikely(!first_page))
+			return NULL;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
-	/* FUTURE development:
-	 *
-	 * Current slow-path essentially falls back to single page
-	 * allocations, which doesn't improve performance.  This code
-	 * need bulk allocation support from the page allocator code.
-	 */
-
-	/* Cache was empty, do real allocation */
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-	page = alloc_pages_node(pool->p.nid, gfp, pool->p.order);
-#else
-	page = alloc_pages(gfp, pool->p.order);
-#endif
-	if (!page)
+	if (unlikely(!__alloc_pages_bulk_nodemask(gfp, pp_nid, NULL,
+						  bulk, &page_list)))
 		return NULL;
 
+	/* First page is extracted and returned to caller */
+	first_page = list_first_entry(&page_list, struct page, lru);
+	list_del(&first_page->lru);
+
+	/* Remaining pages store in alloc.cache */
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, &page_list, lru) {
+		list_del(&page->lru);
+		if (pp_flags & PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP &&
+		    unlikely(!page_pool_dma_map(pool, page))) {
+			put_page(page);
+			continue;
+		}
+		if (likely(pool->alloc.count < PP_ALLOC_CACHE_SIZE)) {
+			pool->alloc.cache[pool->alloc.count++] = page;
+			pool->pages_state_hold_cnt++;
+			trace_page_pool_state_hold(pool, page,
+						   pool->pages_state_hold_cnt);
+		} else {
+			put_page(page);
+		}
+	}
+out:
 	if (pp_flags & PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP &&
-	    unlikely(!page_pool_dma_map(pool, page))) {
-		put_page(page);
+	    unlikely(!page_pool_dma_map(pool, first_page))) {
+		put_page(first_page);
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
 	/* Track how many pages are held 'in-flight' */
 	pool->pages_state_hold_cnt++;
-	trace_page_pool_state_hold(pool, page, pool->pages_state_hold_cnt);
+	trace_page_pool_state_hold(pool, first_page, pool->pages_state_hold_cnt);
 
 	/* When page just alloc'ed is should/must have refcnt 1. */
-	return page;
+	return first_page;
 }
 
 /* For using page_pool replace: alloc_pages() API calls, but provide




      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-01 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-24 10:26 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Introduce a bulk order-0 page allocator for sunrpc Mel Gorman
2021-02-24 10:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: Set rq_page_end differently Mel Gorman
2021-02-24 10:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, page_alloc: Add a bulk page allocator Mel Gorman
2021-02-24 10:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] SUNRPC: Refresh rq_pages using " Mel Gorman
2021-02-24 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Introduce a bulk order-0 page allocator for sunrpc Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-24 11:55   ` Mel Gorman
2021-02-24 13:20 ` Chuck Lever
2021-02-24 18:56 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Use bulk order-0 page allocator API for page_pool Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-24 18:56   ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/3] net: page_pool: refactor dma_map into own function page_pool_dma_map Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-24 20:11     ` Ilias Apalodimas
2021-02-24 18:56   ` [PATCH RFC net-next 2/3] net: page_pool: use alloc_pages_bulk in refill code path Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-24 20:15     ` Ilias Apalodimas
2021-02-26 14:31       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-24 18:56   ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/3] mm: make zone->free_area[order] access faster Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-25 11:28     ` Mel Gorman
2021-02-25 15:16       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-25 15:38         ` Mel Gorman
2021-02-26 14:34           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-03-01 13:29 ` [PATCH RFC V2 net-next 0/2] Use bulk order-0 page allocator API for page_pool Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-03-01 13:29   ` [PATCH RFC V2 net-next 1/2] net: page_pool: refactor dma_map into own function page_pool_dma_map Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-03-01 13:29   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=161460539281.3031322.4594417056131578057.stgit@firesoul \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).