From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A66FC433E0 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F81B614A5 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:37:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9F81B614A5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=virtuozzo.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 218DC6B0071; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:37:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 1C8346B0072; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:37:05 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 0B7FD6B0073; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:37:05 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0166.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.166]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5C36B0071 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:37:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin15.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C2818686B29 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:37:04 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77802610368.15.bears24_260e76a27610 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2CF18637D71 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:37:04 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: bears24_260e76a27610 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3656 Received: from relay.sw.ru (relay.sw.ru [185.231.240.75]) by imf05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:37:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtuozzo.com; s=relay; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=RhI6NeJ9fQNo1JPboHNL4BxIltZhtUXo85xF5hWE03A=; b=y3zos7qAfBdf3c+rhZOcLTbDMs 8qNwDjYKxRqyAFDdbAs0tjhPy4avG3Ib72BbIyhdAvkmlO3qViDQWrfUONt/4RA99n9urutXkxUVy EUyIzUQTduEJToXG2ogPLOWE64xvPvq4Ia+TJwwK1Ss10B/zFzNBdF/02txNHyMBlxpA=; Received: from [192.168.15.133] by relay.sw.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l9qbm-0028G7-9l; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:36:46 +0300 Subject: Re: [v7 PATCH 09/12] mm: vmscan: use per memcg nr_deferred of shrinker To: Yang Shi , Roman Gushchin Cc: Vlastimil Babka , Shakeel Butt , Dave Chinner , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Linux MM , Linux FS-devel Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20210209174646.1310591-1-shy828301@gmail.com> <20210209174646.1310591-10-shy828301@gmail.com> <20210210012726.GO524633@carbon.DHCP.thefacebook.com> From: Kirill Tkhai Message-ID: <1d751688-12a9-a5c3-2d9a-c4b9e65c7492@virtuozzo.com> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:36:56 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 10.02.2021 04:52, Yang Shi wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:27 PM Roman Gushchin wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:46:43AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote: >>> Use per memcg's nr_deferred for memcg aware shrinkers. The shrinker's nr_deferred >>> will be used in the following cases: >>> 1. Non memcg aware shrinkers >>> 2. !CONFIG_MEMCG >>> 3. memcg is disabled by boot parameter >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi >>> --- >>> mm/vmscan.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- >>> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c >>> index d4b030a0b2a9..748aa6e90f83 100644 >>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c >>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c >>> @@ -368,6 +368,24 @@ static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) >>> up_write(&shrinker_rwsem); >>> } >>> >>> +static long count_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker, >>> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) >> >> "Count" is not associated with xchg() semantics in my head, but I don't know >> what's the better version. Maybe steal or pop? > > It is used to retrieve the nr_deferred value. I don't think "steal" or > "pop" helps understand. Actually "count" is borrowed from > count_objects() method of shrinker. I'd also voted for another name. xchg_nr_deferred() or steal/pop sound better for me.