From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1925F0001 for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:56:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:56:59 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 8/9] vfs: Implement generic revoked file operations Message-ID: <20090412185659.GE4394@shareable.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Hugh Dickins , Tejun Heo , Alexey Dobriyan , Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , Greg Kroah-Hartman List-ID: > revoked_file_ops return 0 from reads (aka EOF). Tell poll the file is > always ready for I/O and return -EIO from all other operations. I think read should return -EIO too. If a program is reading from a /proc file (say), and the thing it's reading suddenly disappears, EOF gives the false impression that it's read to the end of formatted data from that file and it can process the data as if it's complete, which is wrong. -- Jamie -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org