linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: mhocko@suse.cz
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/oom: Suppress unnecessary "sharing same memory" message.
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 21:34:27 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201506012134.FAH39526.FtHJSLVMOOQFFO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150601121759.GG7147@dhcp22.suse.cz>

Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 01-06-15 21:10:18, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 01-06-15 19:51:05, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > How can all fatal_signal_pending() "struct task_struct" get access to memory
> > > > reserves when only one of fatal_signal_pending() "struct task_struct" has
> > > > TIF_MEMDIE ?
> > > 
> > > Because of 
> > > 	/*
> > > 	 * If current has a pending SIGKILL or is exiting, then automatically
> > > 	 * select it.  The goal is to allow it to allocate so that it may
> > > 	 * quickly exit and free its memory.
> > > 	 *
> > > 	 * But don't select if current has already released its mm and cleared
> > > 	 * TIF_MEMDIE flag at exit_mm(), otherwise an OOM livelock may occur.
> > > 	 */
> > > 	if (current->mm &&
> > > 	    (fatal_signal_pending(current) || task_will_free_mem(current))) {
> > > 		mark_oom_victim(current);
> > > 		goto out;
> > > 	}
> > 
> > Then, what guarantees that the thread which is between
> > down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem) and up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem)
> > (or whatever locks which are blocking the OOM victim) calls out_of_memory() ?
> > That thread might be doing !__GFP_FS allocation request.
> 
> Could you point to such a place?

I think sequence shown below is possible.

[Thread1-in-Porcess1         Thread2-in-Porcess1]    [Thread3-in-Process2]

mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
                                                     kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL)
                                                     Invokes the OOM killer
                             Receives TIF_MEMDIE
Receives SIGKILL
                             Receives SIGKILL
                             mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); <= Waiting forever
kmalloc(GFP_NOFS); <= Can't return because out_of_memory() is not called.
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
                             kmalloc(GFP_NOFS);
                             mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-01 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-25 14:33 [PATCH] mm/oom: Suppress unnecessary "sharing same memory" message Tetsuo Handa
2015-05-26 17:02 ` Michal Hocko
2015-05-26 21:39   ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-05-27 16:45     ` Michal Hocko
2015-05-27 21:59       ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-05-28 18:05         ` Michal Hocko
2015-05-29 12:40           ` [PATCH] mm/oom: Suppress unnecessary "sharing same memory"message Tetsuo Handa
2015-05-29 14:49             ` Michal Hocko
2015-05-29 17:20               ` [PATCH] mm/oom: Suppress unnecessary "sharing same memory" message Tetsuo Handa
2015-05-31 11:10                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-01  9:58                   ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-01 10:16                   ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-01 12:02                     ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-01 12:15                       ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-01 13:04                         ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-01 13:12                           ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-01 15:27                             ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-01 15:42                               ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-01  9:03                 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-01 10:51                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-01 11:43                     ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-01 12:10                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-01 12:17                         ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-01 12:34                           ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2015-06-01 13:05                             ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-29 11:14 Tetsuo Handa
2015-09-01 13:34 ` Michal Hocko
2015-09-02 11:27   ` [PATCH] mm/oom: Suppress unnecessary "sharing same memory"message Tetsuo Handa
2015-09-02 14:24     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201506012134.FAH39526.FtHJSLVMOOQFFO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).