linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
	hch@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, vgoyal@redhat.com,
	lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	mhocko@suse.cz, clm@fb.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
	david@fromorbit.com, gthelen@google.com,
	khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/51] writeback: implement WB_has_dirty_io wb_state flag
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 17:42:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150630154237.GQ7252@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432329245-5844-32-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

On Fri 22-05-15 17:13:45, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Currently, wb_has_dirty_io() determines whether a wb (bdi_writeback)
> has any dirty inode by testing all three IO lists on each invocation
> without actively keeping track.  For cgroup writeback support, a
> single bdi will host multiple wb's each of which will host dirty
> inodes separately and we'll need to make bdi_has_dirty_io(), which
> currently only represents the root wb, aggregate has_dirty_io from all
> member wb's, which requires tracking transitions in has_dirty_io state
> on each wb.
> 
> This patch introduces inode_wb_list_{move|del}_locked() to consolidate
> IO list operations leaving queue_io() the only other function which
> directly manipulates IO lists (via move_expired_inodes()).  All three
> functions are updated to call wb_io_lists_[de]populated() which keep
> track of whether the wb has dirty inodes or not and record it using
> the new WB_has_dirty_io flag.  inode_wb_list_moved_locked()'s return
> value indicates whether the wb had no dirty inodes before.
> 
> mark_inode_dirty() is restructured so that the return value of
> inode_wb_list_move_locked() can be used for deciding whether to wake
> up the wb.
> 
> While at it, change {bdi|wb}_has_dirty_io()'s return values to bool.
> These functions were returning 0 and 1 before.  Also, add a comment
> explaining the synchronization of wb_state flags.

Looks good. You can add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>

								Honza

> 
> v2: Updated to accommodate b_dirty_time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>  fs/fs-writeback.c                | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h |   1 +
>  include/linux/backing-dev.h      |   8 ++-
>  mm/backing-dev.c                 |   2 +-
>  4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 7ec491b..0a90dc55 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,66 @@ static inline struct inode *wb_inode(struct list_head *head)
>  
>  EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(wbc_writepage);
>  
> +static bool wb_io_lists_populated(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> +{
> +	if (wb_has_dirty_io(wb)) {
> +		return false;
> +	} else {
> +		set_bit(WB_has_dirty_io, &wb->state);
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void wb_io_lists_depopulated(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> +{
> +	if (wb_has_dirty_io(wb) && list_empty(&wb->b_dirty) &&
> +	    list_empty(&wb->b_io) && list_empty(&wb->b_more_io))
> +		clear_bit(WB_has_dirty_io, &wb->state);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * inode_wb_list_move_locked - move an inode onto a bdi_writeback IO list
> + * @inode: inode to be moved
> + * @wb: target bdi_writeback
> + * @head: one of @wb->b_{dirty|io|more_io}
> + *
> + * Move @inode->i_wb_list to @list of @wb and set %WB_has_dirty_io.
> + * Returns %true if @inode is the first occupant of the !dirty_time IO
> + * lists; otherwise, %false.
> + */
> +static bool inode_wb_list_move_locked(struct inode *inode,
> +				      struct bdi_writeback *wb,
> +				      struct list_head *head)
> +{
> +	assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock);
> +
> +	list_move(&inode->i_wb_list, head);
> +
> +	/* dirty_time doesn't count as dirty_io until expiration */
> +	if (head != &wb->b_dirty_time)
> +		return wb_io_lists_populated(wb);
> +
> +	wb_io_lists_depopulated(wb);
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * inode_wb_list_del_locked - remove an inode from its bdi_writeback IO list
> + * @inode: inode to be removed
> + * @wb: bdi_writeback @inode is being removed from
> + *
> + * Remove @inode which may be on one of @wb->b_{dirty|io|more_io} lists and
> + * clear %WB_has_dirty_io if all are empty afterwards.
> + */
> +static void inode_wb_list_del_locked(struct inode *inode,
> +				     struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> +{
> +	assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock);
> +
> +	list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
> +	wb_io_lists_depopulated(wb);
> +}
> +
>  static void wb_wakeup(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  {
>  	spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> @@ -217,7 +277,7 @@ void inode_wb_list_del(struct inode *inode)
>  	struct bdi_writeback *wb = inode_to_wb(inode);
>  
>  	spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
> -	list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
> +	inode_wb_list_del_locked(inode, wb);
>  	spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
>  }
>  
> @@ -232,7 +292,6 @@ void inode_wb_list_del(struct inode *inode)
>   */
>  static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  {
> -	assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock);
>  	if (!list_empty(&wb->b_dirty)) {
>  		struct inode *tail;
>  
> @@ -240,7 +299,7 @@ static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  		if (time_before(inode->dirtied_when, tail->dirtied_when))
>  			inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
>  	}
> -	list_move(&inode->i_wb_list, &wb->b_dirty);
> +	inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, wb, &wb->b_dirty);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -248,8 +307,7 @@ static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>   */
>  static void requeue_io(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  {
> -	assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock);
> -	list_move(&inode->i_wb_list, &wb->b_more_io);
> +	inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, wb, &wb->b_more_io);
>  }
>  
>  static void inode_sync_complete(struct inode *inode)
> @@ -358,6 +416,8 @@ static void queue_io(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct wb_writeback_work *work)
>  	moved = move_expired_inodes(&wb->b_dirty, &wb->b_io, 0, work);
>  	moved += move_expired_inodes(&wb->b_dirty_time, &wb->b_io,
>  				     EXPIRE_DIRTY_ATIME, work);
> +	if (moved)
> +		wb_io_lists_populated(wb);
>  	trace_writeback_queue_io(wb, work, moved);
>  }
>  
> @@ -483,10 +543,10 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
>  		redirty_tail(inode, wb);
>  	} else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) {
>  		inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
> -		list_move(&inode->i_wb_list, &wb->b_dirty_time);
> +		inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, wb, &wb->b_dirty_time);
>  	} else {
>  		/* The inode is clean. Remove from writeback lists. */
> -		list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
> +		inode_wb_list_del_locked(inode, wb);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -628,7 +688,7 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
>  	 * touch it. See comment above for explanation.
>  	 */
>  	if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_ALL))
> -		list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
> +		inode_wb_list_del_locked(inode, wb);
>  	spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
>  	inode_sync_complete(inode);
>  out:
> @@ -1327,37 +1387,39 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
>  		 * reposition it (that would break b_dirty time-ordering).
>  		 */
>  		if (!was_dirty) {
> +			struct list_head *dirty_list;
>  			bool wakeup_bdi = false;
>  			bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode);
>  
>  			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>  			spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
> -			if (bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi)) {
> -				WARN(!test_bit(WB_registered, &bdi->wb.state),
> -				     "bdi-%s not registered\n", bdi->name);
>  
> -				/*
> -				 * If this is the first dirty inode for this
> -				 * bdi, we have to wake-up the corresponding
> -				 * bdi thread to make sure background
> -				 * write-back happens later.
> -				 */
> -				if (!wb_has_dirty_io(&bdi->wb))
> -					wakeup_bdi = true;
> -			}
> +			WARN(bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) &&
> +			     !test_bit(WB_registered, &bdi->wb.state),
> +			     "bdi-%s not registered\n", bdi->name);
>  
>  			inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
>  			if (dirtytime)
>  				inode->dirtied_time_when = jiffies;
> +
>  			if (inode->i_state & (I_DIRTY_INODE | I_DIRTY_PAGES))
> -				list_move(&inode->i_wb_list, &bdi->wb.b_dirty);
> +				dirty_list = &bdi->wb.b_dirty;
>  			else
> -				list_move(&inode->i_wb_list,
> -					  &bdi->wb.b_dirty_time);
> +				dirty_list = &bdi->wb.b_dirty_time;
> +
> +			wakeup_bdi = inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, &bdi->wb,
> +							       dirty_list);
> +
>  			spin_unlock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
>  			trace_writeback_dirty_inode_enqueue(inode);
>  
> -			if (wakeup_bdi)
> +			/*
> +			 * If this is the first dirty inode for this bdi,
> +			 * we have to wake-up the corresponding bdi thread
> +			 * to make sure background write-back happens
> +			 * later.
> +			 */
> +			if (bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) && wakeup_bdi)
>  				wb_wakeup_delayed(&bdi->wb);
>  			return;
>  		}
> diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
> index eb38676..7a94b78 100644
> --- a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ struct dentry;
>  enum wb_state {
>  	WB_registered,		/* bdi_register() was done */
>  	WB_writeback_running,	/* Writeback is in progress */
> +	WB_has_dirty_io,	/* Dirty inodes on ->b_{dirty|io|more_io} */
>  };
>  
>  enum wb_congested_state {
> diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> index 6f08821..3c8403c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ void bdi_start_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, long nr_pages,
>  			enum wb_reason reason);
>  void bdi_start_background_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
>  void wb_workfn(struct work_struct *work);
> -int bdi_has_dirty_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
> +bool bdi_has_dirty_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
>  void wb_wakeup_delayed(struct bdi_writeback *wb);
>  
>  extern spinlock_t bdi_lock;
> @@ -37,11 +37,9 @@ extern struct list_head bdi_list;
>  
>  extern struct workqueue_struct *bdi_wq;
>  
> -static inline int wb_has_dirty_io(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> +static inline bool wb_has_dirty_io(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  {
> -	return !list_empty(&wb->b_dirty) ||
> -	       !list_empty(&wb->b_io) ||
> -	       !list_empty(&wb->b_more_io);
> +	return test_bit(WB_has_dirty_io, &wb->state);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void __add_wb_stat(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
> diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
> index 5029c4a..161ddf1 100644
> --- a/mm/backing-dev.c
> +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
> @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static int __init default_bdi_init(void)
>  }
>  subsys_initcall(default_bdi_init);
>  
> -int bdi_has_dirty_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
> +bool bdi_has_dirty_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
>  {
>  	return wb_has_dirty_io(&bdi->wb);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.4.0
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-30 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 131+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-22 21:13 [PATCHSET 1/3 v4 block/for-4.2/core] writeback: cgroup writeback support Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 01/51] page_writeback: revive cancel_dirty_page() in a restricted form Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 02/51] memcg: add per cgroup dirty page accounting Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 03/51] blkcg: move block/blk-cgroup.h to include/linux/blk-cgroup.h Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 04/51] update !CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP dummies in include/linux/blk-cgroup.h Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 05/51] blkcg: always create the blkcg_gq for the root blkcg Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 06/51] memcg: add mem_cgroup_root_css Tejun Heo
2015-06-17 14:56   ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-17 18:25     ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-18 11:12       ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-18 17:49         ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-19  9:18           ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-19 15:17             ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 07/51] blkcg: add blkcg_root_css Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 08/51] cgroup, block: implement task_get_css() and use it in bio_associate_current() Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 09/51] blkcg: implement task_get_blkcg_css() Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 10/51] blkcg: implement bio_associate_blkcg() Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 11/51] memcg: implement mem_cgroup_css_from_page() Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 23:28   ` Johannes Weiner
2015-05-24 21:24     ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-27 12:58       ` Johannes Weiner
2015-05-27 16:13   ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2015-05-27 17:09     ` Johannes Weiner
2015-05-27 17:48       ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-27 17:57   ` [PATCH v3 " Tejun Heo
2015-05-28  0:00   ` [PATCH v4 " Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 12/51] writeback: move backing_dev_info->state into bdi_writeback Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 13/51] writeback: move backing_dev_info->bdi_stat[] " Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 14/51] writeback: move bandwidth related fields from backing_dev_info " Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 15/51] writeback: s/bdi/wb/ in mm/page-writeback.c Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 16/51] writeback: move backing_dev_info->wb_lock and ->worklist into bdi_writeback Tejun Heo
2015-06-07  0:49   ` Sasha Levin
2015-06-08  5:57     ` [PATCH block/for-4.2-writeback] v9fs: fix error handling in v9fs_session_init() Tejun Heo
2015-06-08 15:10       ` Jens Axboe
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 17/51] writeback: reorganize mm/backing-dev.c Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 18/51] writeback: separate out include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 19/51] bdi: make inode_to_bdi() inline Tejun Heo
2015-06-30  6:47   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 20/51] writeback: add @gfp to wb_init() Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 21/51] bdi: separate out congested state into a separate struct Tejun Heo
2015-06-30  9:21   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 22/51] writeback: add {CONFIG|BDI_CAP|FS}_CGROUP_WRITEBACK Tejun Heo
2015-06-30  9:37   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-02  1:10     ` Tejun Heo
2015-07-03 10:49       ` Jan Kara
2015-07-03 17:14         ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 23/51] writeback: make backing_dev_info host cgroup-specific bdi_writebacks Tejun Heo
2015-06-30 10:14   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 24/51] writeback, blkcg: associate each blkcg_gq with the corresponding bdi_writeback_congested Tejun Heo
2015-06-30  9:08   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 25/51] writeback: attribute stats to the matching per-cgroup bdi_writeback Tejun Heo
2015-06-30 14:17   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 26/51] writeback: let balance_dirty_pages() work on the matching cgroup bdi_writeback Tejun Heo
2015-06-30 14:31   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-02  1:26     ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 27/51] writeback: make congestion functions per bdi_writeback Tejun Heo
2015-06-30 14:50   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 28/51] writeback, blkcg: restructure blk_{set|clear}_queue_congested() Tejun Heo
2015-06-30 15:02   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-02  1:38     ` Tejun Heo
2015-07-03 12:16       ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 29/51] writeback, blkcg: propagate non-root blkcg congestion state Tejun Heo
2015-06-30 15:03   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 30/51] writeback: implement and use inode_congested() Tejun Heo
2015-06-30 15:21   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-02  1:46     ` Tejun Heo
2015-07-03 12:17       ` Jan Kara
2015-07-03 17:07         ` Tejun Heo
2015-07-04 15:12         ` [PATCH block/for-4.3] writeback: explain why @inode is allowed to be NULL for inode_congested() Tejun Heo
2015-07-08  8:12           ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 31/51] writeback: implement WB_has_dirty_io wb_state flag Tejun Heo
2015-06-30 15:42   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 32/51] writeback: implement backing_dev_info->tot_write_bandwidth Tejun Heo
2015-06-30 16:14   ` Jan Kara
2015-06-30 16:42     ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 33/51] writeback: make bdi_has_dirty_io() take multiple bdi_writeback's into account Tejun Heo
2015-06-30 16:48   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-02  2:01     ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 34/51] writeback: don't issue wb_writeback_work if clean Tejun Heo
2015-06-30 16:18   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 35/51] writeback: make bdi->min/max_ratio handling cgroup writeback aware Tejun Heo
2015-07-01  7:00   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 36/51] writeback: implement bdi_for_each_wb() Tejun Heo
2015-07-01  7:27   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-02  2:22     ` Tejun Heo
2015-07-03 12:26       ` Jan Kara
2015-07-03 17:06         ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 37/51] writeback: remove bdi_start_writeback() Tejun Heo
2015-07-01  7:30   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 38/51] writeback: make laptop_mode_timer_fn() handle multiple bdi_writeback's Tejun Heo
2015-07-01  7:32   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 39/51] writeback: make writeback_in_progress() take bdi_writeback instead of backing_dev_info Tejun Heo
2015-07-01  7:47   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-02  2:28     ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 40/51] writeback: make bdi_start_background_writeback() " Tejun Heo
2015-07-01  7:50   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-02  2:29     ` Tejun Heo
2015-07-06 19:36     ` [PATCH block/for-4.3] writeback: update writeback tracepoints to report cgroup Tejun Heo
2015-07-08  8:17       ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 41/51] writeback: make wakeup_flusher_threads() handle multiple bdi_writeback's Tejun Heo
2015-07-01  8:15   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-02  2:37     ` Tejun Heo
2015-07-03 13:02       ` Jan Kara
2015-07-03 16:33         ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 42/51] writeback: make wakeup_dirtytime_writeback() " Tejun Heo
2015-07-01  8:20   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 43/51] writeback: add wb_writeback_work->auto_free Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 44/51] writeback: implement bdi_wait_for_completion() Tejun Heo
2015-07-01 16:04   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-02  3:06     ` Tejun Heo
2015-07-03 12:36       ` Jan Kara
2015-07-03 17:02         ` Tejun Heo
2015-07-01 16:09   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-02  3:01     ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:13 ` [PATCH 45/51] writeback: implement wb_wait_for_single_work() Tejun Heo
2015-07-01 19:07   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-02  3:07     ` Tejun Heo
2015-07-03 22:12     ` [PATCH block/for-4.3] writeback: remove wb_writeback_work->single_wait/done Tejun Heo
2015-07-08  8:24       ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:14 ` [PATCH 46/51] writeback: restructure try_writeback_inodes_sb[_nr]() Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:14 ` [PATCH 47/51] writeback: make writeback initiation functions handle multiple bdi_writeback's Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 21:14 ` [PATCH 48/51] writeback: dirty inodes against their matching cgroup bdi_writeback's Tejun Heo
2015-07-01 19:16   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:14 ` [PATCH 49/51] buffer, writeback: make __block_write_full_page() honor cgroup writeback Tejun Heo
2015-07-01 19:21   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-01 19:28     ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:14 ` [PATCH 50/51] mpage: make __mpage_writepage() " Tejun Heo
2015-07-01 19:26   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-22 21:14 ` [PATCH 51/51] ext2: enable cgroup writeback support Tejun Heo
2015-07-01 19:29   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-02  3:08     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150630154237.GQ7252@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).