From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
vdavydov@parallels.com, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memcg: flatten task_struct->memcg_oom
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 17:25:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150901152519.GG8810@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150828220158.GD11089@htj.dyndns.org>
On Fri 28-08-15 18:01:58, Tejun Heo wrote:
> task_struct->memcg_oom is a sub-struct containing fields which are
> used for async memcg oom handling. Most task_struct fields aren't
> packaged this way and it can lead to unnecessary alignment paddings.
> This patch flattens it.
>
> * task.memcg_oom.memcg -> task.memcg_in_oom
> * task.memcg_oom.gfp_mask -> task.memcg_oom_gfp_mask
> * task.memcg_oom.order -> task.memcg_oom_order
> * task.memcg_oom.may_oom -> task.memcg_may_oom
>
> In addition, task.memcg_may_oom is relocated to where other bitfields
> are which reduces the size of task_struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
> Hello,
>
> These two patches are what survived from the following patchset.
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1440775530-18630-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
>
> Thanks.
>
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 10 +++++-----
> include/linux/sched.h | 13 ++++++-------
> mm/memcontrol.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -407,19 +407,19 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct me
>
> static inline void mem_cgroup_oom_enable(void)
> {
> - WARN_ON(current->memcg_oom.may_oom);
> - current->memcg_oom.may_oom = 1;
> + WARN_ON(current->memcg_may_oom);
> + current->memcg_may_oom = 1;
> }
>
> static inline void mem_cgroup_oom_disable(void)
> {
> - WARN_ON(!current->memcg_oom.may_oom);
> - current->memcg_oom.may_oom = 0;
> + WARN_ON(!current->memcg_may_oom);
> + current->memcg_may_oom = 0;
> }
>
> static inline bool task_in_memcg_oom(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - return p->memcg_oom.memcg;
> + return p->memcg_in_oom;
> }
>
> bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool wait);
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1451,7 +1451,9 @@ struct task_struct {
> unsigned sched_reset_on_fork:1;
> unsigned sched_contributes_to_load:1;
> unsigned sched_migrated:1;
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> + unsigned memcg_may_oom:1;
> +#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> unsigned memcg_kmem_skip_account:1;
> #endif
> @@ -1782,12 +1784,9 @@ struct task_struct {
> unsigned long trace_recursion;
> #endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> - struct memcg_oom_info {
> - struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> - gfp_t gfp_mask;
> - int order;
> - unsigned int may_oom:1;
> - } memcg_oom;
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg_in_oom;
> + gfp_t memcg_oom_gfp_mask;
> + int memcg_oom_order;
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
> struct uprobe_task *utask;
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@ static void memcg_oom_recover(struct mem
>
> static void mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t mask, int order)
> {
> - if (!current->memcg_oom.may_oom)
> + if (!current->memcg_may_oom)
> return;
> /*
> * We are in the middle of the charge context here, so we
> @@ -1669,9 +1669,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cg
> * and when we know whether the fault was overall successful.
> */
> css_get(&memcg->css);
> - current->memcg_oom.memcg = memcg;
> - current->memcg_oom.gfp_mask = mask;
> - current->memcg_oom.order = order;
> + current->memcg_in_oom = memcg;
> + current->memcg_oom_gfp_mask = mask;
> + current->memcg_oom_order = order;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cg
> */
> bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool handle)
> {
> - struct mem_cgroup *memcg = current->memcg_oom.memcg;
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = current->memcg_in_oom;
> struct oom_wait_info owait;
> bool locked;
>
> @@ -1721,8 +1721,8 @@ bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool han
> if (locked && !memcg->oom_kill_disable) {
> mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg);
> finish_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait);
> - mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, current->memcg_oom.gfp_mask,
> - current->memcg_oom.order);
> + mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, current->memcg_oom_gfp_mask,
> + current->memcg_oom_order);
> } else {
> schedule();
> mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg);
> @@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool han
> memcg_oom_recover(memcg);
> }
> cleanup:
> - current->memcg_oom.memcg = NULL;
> + current->memcg_in_oom = NULL;
> css_put(&memcg->css);
> return true;
> }
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-01 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-28 22:01 [PATCH 1/2] memcg: flatten task_struct->memcg_oom Tejun Heo
2015-08-28 22:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: always enable kmemcg on the default hierarchy Tejun Heo
2015-08-31 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2015-09-04 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/2] memcg: punt high overage reclaim to return-to-userland path Tejun Heo
2015-09-07 9:23 ` Michal Hocko
2015-09-08 16:59 ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-07 11:38 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-09-08 17:00 ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-15 9:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: always enable kmemcg on the default hierarchy Johannes Weiner
2015-09-01 15:25 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2015-09-02 11:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg: flatten task_struct->memcg_oom Vladimir Davydov
2015-09-13 18:59 Tejun Heo
2015-09-15 7:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-09-20 14:45 ` Sasha Levin
2015-09-21 20:01 ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-30 18:54 ` Tejun Heo
2015-11-25 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-25 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-25 15:31 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2015-11-25 17:34 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2015-11-25 17:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-11 16:25 ` Tejun Heo
2015-12-15 19:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150901152519.GG8810@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).