linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 26/33] x86, pkeys: actually enable Memory Protection Keys in CPU
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:02:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160212210229.6708027C@viggo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160212210152.9CAD15B0@viggo.jf.intel.com>


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

This sets the bit in 'cr4' to actually enable the protection
keys feature.  We also include a boot-time disable for the
feature "nopku".

Seting X86_CR4_PKE will cause the X86_FEATURE_OSPKE cpuid
bit to appear set.  At this point in boot, identify_cpu()
has already run the actual CPUID instructions and populated
the "cpu features" structures.  We need to go back and
re-run identify_cpu() to make sure it gets updated values.

We *could* simply re-populate the 11th word of the cpuid
data, but this is probably quick enough.

Also note that with the cpu_has() check and X86_FEATURE_PKU
present in disabled-features.h, we do not need an #ifdef
for setup_pku().

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---

 b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |    3 ++
 b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c        |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c~pkeys-50-should-be-last-patch arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c~pkeys-50-should-be-last-patch	2016-02-12 10:44:25.545672379 -0800
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c	2016-02-12 10:44:25.551672653 -0800
@@ -288,6 +288,46 @@ static __always_inline void setup_smap(s
 }
 
 /*
+ * Protection Keys are not available in 32-bit mode.
+ */
+static bool pku_disabled;
+static __always_inline void setup_pku(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+	if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PKU))
+		return;
+	if (pku_disabled)
+		return;
+
+	cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_PKE);
+	/*
+	 * Seting X86_CR4_PKE will cause the X86_FEATURE_OSPKE
+	 * cpuid bit to be set.  We need to ensure that we
+	 * update that bit in this CPU's "cpu_info".
+	 */
+	get_cpu_cap(c);
+}
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
+static __init int setup_disable_pku(char *arg)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Do not clear the X86_FEATURE_PKU bit.  All of the
+	 * runtime checks are against OSPKE so clearing the
+	 * bit does nothing.
+	 *
+	 * This way, we will see "pku" in cpuinfo, but not
+	 * "ospke", which is exactly what we want.  It shows
+	 * that the CPU has PKU, but the OS has not enabled it.
+	 * This happens to be exactly how a system would look
+	 * if we disabled the config option.
+	 */
+	pr_info("x86: 'nopku' specified, disabling Memory Protection Keys\n");
+	pku_disabled = true;
+	return 1;
+}
+__setup("nopku", setup_disable_pku);
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
+
+/*
  * Some CPU features depend on higher CPUID levels, which may not always
  * be available due to CPUID level capping or broken virtualization
  * software.  Add those features to this table to auto-disable them.
@@ -944,6 +984,7 @@ static void identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_
 	init_hypervisor(c);
 	x86_init_rdrand(c);
 	x86_init_cache_qos(c);
+	setup_pku(c);
 
 	/*
 	 * Clear/Set all flags overriden by options, need do it
diff -puN Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt~pkeys-50-should-be-last-patch Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
--- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt~pkeys-50-should-be-last-patch	2016-02-12 10:44:25.547672471 -0800
+++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt	2016-02-12 10:44:25.552672699 -0800
@@ -976,6 +976,9 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes
 			See Documentation/x86/intel_mpx.txt for more
 			information about the feature.
 
+	nopku		[X86] Disable Memory Protection Keys CPU feature found
+			in some Intel CPUs.
+
 	eagerfpu=	[X86]
 			on	enable eager fpu restore
 			off	disable eager fpu restore
_

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-12 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-12 21:01 [PATCH 00/33] x86: Memory Protection Keys (v10) Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:01 ` [PATCH 01/33] mm: introduce get_user_pages_remote() Dave Hansen
2016-02-15  6:09   ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-15 16:29     ` Dave Hansen
2016-02-15  6:14   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-02-12 21:01 ` [PATCH 02/33] mm: overload get_user_pages() functions Dave Hansen
2016-02-16  8:36   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-02-17 18:15     ` Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:01 ` [PATCH 03/33] mm, gup: switch callers of get_user_pages() to not pass tsk/mm Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:01 ` [PATCH 04/33] x86, fpu: add placeholder for Processor Trace XSAVE state Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 05/33] x86, pkeys: Add Kconfig option Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 06/33] x86, pkeys: cpuid bit definition Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 07/33] x86, pkeys: define new CR4 bit Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 08/33] x86, pkeys: add PKRU xsave fields and data structure(s) Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 09/33] x86, pkeys: PTE bits for storing protection key Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 10/33] x86, pkeys: new page fault error code bit: PF_PK Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 11/33] x86, pkeys: store protection in high VMA flags Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 12/33] x86, pkeys: arch-specific protection bits Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 13/33] x86, pkeys: pass VMA down in to fault signal generation code Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 14/33] signals, pkeys: notify userspace about protection key faults Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 15/33] x86, pkeys: fill in pkey field in siginfo Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 16/33] x86, pkeys: add functions to fetch PKRU Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 17/33] mm: factor out VMA fault permission checking Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 18/33] x86, mm: simplify get_user_pages() PTE bit handling Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 19/33] x86, pkeys: check VMAs and PTEs for protection keys Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 20/33] mm: do not enforce PKEY permissions on "foreign" mm access Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 21/33] x86, pkeys: optimize fault handling in access_error() Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 22/33] x86, pkeys: differentiate instruction fetches Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 23/33] x86, pkeys: dump PKRU with other kernel registers Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 24/33] x86, pkeys: dump pkey from VMA in /proc/pid/smaps Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 25/33] x86, pkeys: add Kconfig prompt to existing config option Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 27/33] mm, multi-arch: pass a protection key in to calc_vm_flag_bits() Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 28/33] x86, pkeys: add arch_validate_pkey() Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 29/33] x86: separate out LDT init from context init Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 30/33] x86, fpu: allow setting of XSAVE state Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 31/33] x86, pkeys: allow kernel to modify user pkey rights register Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 32/33] x86, pkeys: create an x86 arch_calc_vm_prot_bits() for VMA flags Dave Hansen
2016-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 33/33] x86, pkeys: execute-only support Dave Hansen
2016-02-17 21:27   ` Kees Cook
2016-02-17 21:33     ` Dave Hansen
2016-02-17 21:36       ` Kees Cook
2016-02-17 22:17     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-17 22:53       ` Dave Hansen
2016-02-18  0:46         ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-16  9:29 ` [PATCH 00/33] x86: Memory Protection Keys (v10) Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160212210229.6708027C@viggo.jf.intel.com \
    --to=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).