From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: check the return value of lookup_page_ext for all call sites
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 11:58:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160524025811.GA29094@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464023768-31025-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org>
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:16:08AM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> Per the discussion with Joonsoo Kim [1], we need check the return value of
> lookup_page_ext() for all call sites since it might return NULL in some cases,
> although it is unlikely, i.e. memory hotplug.
>
> Tested with ltp with "page_owner=0".
>
> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160519002809.GA10245@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
I didn't read code code in detail to see how page_ext memory space
allocated in boot code and memory hotplug but to me, it's not good
to check NULL whenever we calls lookup_page_ext.
More dangerous thing is now page_ext is used by optionable feature(ie, not
critical for system stability) but if we want to use page_ext as
another important tool for the system in future,
it could be a serious problem.
Can we put some hooks of page_ext into memory-hotplug so guarantee
that page_ext memory space is allocated with memmap space at the
same time? IOW, once every PFN wakers find a page is valid, page_ext
is valid, too so lookup_page_ext never returns NULL on valid page
by design.
I hope we consider this direction, too.
Thanks.
> ---
> include/linux/page_idle.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> mm/page_alloc.c | 6 ++++++
> mm/page_owner.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/page_poison.c | 8 +++++++-
> mm/vmstat.c | 2 ++
> 5 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/page_idle.h b/include/linux/page_idle.h
> index bf268fa..8f5d4ad 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page_idle.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page_idle.h
> @@ -46,33 +46,62 @@ extern struct page_ext_operations page_idle_ops;
>
> static inline bool page_is_young(struct page *page)
> {
> - return test_bit(PAGE_EXT_YOUNG, &lookup_page_ext(page)->flags);
> + struct page_ext *page_ext;
> + page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext)
> + return false;
> +
> + return test_bit(PAGE_EXT_YOUNG, &page_ext->flags);
> }
>
> static inline void set_page_young(struct page *page)
> {
> - set_bit(PAGE_EXT_YOUNG, &lookup_page_ext(page)->flags);
> + struct page_ext *page_ext;
> + page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext)
> + return;
> +
> + set_bit(PAGE_EXT_YOUNG, &page_ext->flags);
> }
>
> static inline bool test_and_clear_page_young(struct page *page)
> {
> - return test_and_clear_bit(PAGE_EXT_YOUNG,
> - &lookup_page_ext(page)->flags);
> + struct page_ext *page_ext;
> + page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext)
> + return false;
> +
> + return test_and_clear_bit(PAGE_EXT_YOUNG, &page_ext->flags);
> }
>
> static inline bool page_is_idle(struct page *page)
> {
> - return test_bit(PAGE_EXT_IDLE, &lookup_page_ext(page)->flags);
> + struct page_ext *page_ext;
> + page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext)
> + return false;
> +
> + return test_bit(PAGE_EXT_IDLE, &page_ext->flags);
> }
>
> static inline void set_page_idle(struct page *page)
> {
> - set_bit(PAGE_EXT_IDLE, &lookup_page_ext(page)->flags);
> + struct page_ext *page_ext;
> + page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext)
> + return;
> +
> + set_bit(PAGE_EXT_IDLE, &page_ext->flags);
> }
>
> static inline void clear_page_idle(struct page *page)
> {
> - clear_bit(PAGE_EXT_IDLE, &lookup_page_ext(page)->flags);
> + struct page_ext *page_ext;
> + page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext)
> + return;
> +
> + clear_bit(PAGE_EXT_IDLE, &page_ext->flags);
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index f8f3bfc..d27e8b9 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -656,6 +656,9 @@ static inline void set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> return;
>
> page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext))
> + return;
> +
> __set_bit(PAGE_EXT_DEBUG_GUARD, &page_ext->flags);
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);
> @@ -673,6 +676,9 @@ static inline void clear_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> return;
>
> page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext))
> + return;
> +
> __clear_bit(PAGE_EXT_DEBUG_GUARD, &page_ext->flags);
>
> set_page_private(page, 0);
> diff --git a/mm/page_owner.c b/mm/page_owner.c
> index 792b56d..902e398 100644
> --- a/mm/page_owner.c
> +++ b/mm/page_owner.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ void __reset_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
>
> for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
> page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page + i);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext))
> + continue;
> __clear_bit(PAGE_EXT_OWNER, &page_ext->flags);
> }
> }
> @@ -62,6 +64,10 @@ void __reset_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> void __set_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int order, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> struct page_ext *page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> +
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext))
> + return;
> +
> struct stack_trace trace = {
> .nr_entries = 0,
> .max_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(page_ext->trace_entries),
> @@ -82,6 +88,8 @@ void __set_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int order, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> void __set_page_owner_migrate_reason(struct page *page, int reason)
> {
> struct page_ext *page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext))
> + return;
>
> page_ext->last_migrate_reason = reason;
> }
> @@ -89,6 +97,12 @@ void __set_page_owner_migrate_reason(struct page *page, int reason)
> gfp_t __get_page_owner_gfp(struct page *page)
> {
> struct page_ext *page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext))
> + /*
> + * The caller just returns 0 if no valid gfp
> + * So return 0 here too.
> + */
> + return 0;
>
> return page_ext->gfp_mask;
> }
> @@ -97,6 +111,10 @@ void __copy_page_owner(struct page *oldpage, struct page *newpage)
> {
> struct page_ext *old_ext = lookup_page_ext(oldpage);
> struct page_ext *new_ext = lookup_page_ext(newpage);
> +
> + if (unlikely(!old_ext || !new_ext))
> + return;
> +
> int i;
>
> new_ext->order = old_ext->order;
> @@ -186,6 +204,11 @@ err:
> void __dump_page_owner(struct page *page)
> {
> struct page_ext *page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext)) {
> + pr_alert("There is not page extension available.\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> struct stack_trace trace = {
> .nr_entries = page_ext->nr_entries,
> .entries = &page_ext->trace_entries[0],
> @@ -251,6 +274,8 @@ read_page_owner(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> }
>
> page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext))
> + continue;
>
> /*
> * Some pages could be missed by concurrent allocation or free,
> @@ -317,6 +342,8 @@ static void init_pages_in_zone(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct zone *zone)
> continue;
>
> page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext))
> + continue;
>
> /* Maybe overraping zone */
> if (test_bit(PAGE_EXT_OWNER, &page_ext->flags))
> diff --git a/mm/page_poison.c b/mm/page_poison.c
> index 1eae5fa..2e647c6 100644
> --- a/mm/page_poison.c
> +++ b/mm/page_poison.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ static inline void set_page_poison(struct page *page)
> struct page_ext *page_ext;
>
> page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext))
> + return;
> +
> __set_bit(PAGE_EXT_DEBUG_POISON, &page_ext->flags);
> }
>
> @@ -62,6 +65,9 @@ static inline void clear_page_poison(struct page *page)
> struct page_ext *page_ext;
>
> page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext))
> + return;
> +
> __clear_bit(PAGE_EXT_DEBUG_POISON, &page_ext->flags);
> }
>
> @@ -70,7 +76,7 @@ bool page_is_poisoned(struct page *page)
> struct page_ext *page_ext;
>
> page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> - if (!page_ext)
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext))
> return false;
>
> return test_bit(PAGE_EXT_DEBUG_POISON, &page_ext->flags);
> diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
> index 77e42ef..cb2a67b 100644
> --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> @@ -1061,6 +1061,8 @@ static void pagetypeinfo_showmixedcount_print(struct seq_file *m,
> continue;
>
> page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + if (unlikely(!page_ext))
> + continue;
>
> if (!test_bit(PAGE_EXT_OWNER, &page_ext->flags))
> continue;
> --
> 2.0.2
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-24 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-23 17:16 [PATCH] mm: check the return value of lookup_page_ext for all call sites Yang Shi
2016-05-24 2:58 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2016-05-26 0:37 ` Minchan Kim
2016-05-26 23:15 ` Shi, Yang
2016-05-27 5:14 ` Minchan Kim
2016-05-27 6:08 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-27 8:11 ` Minchan Kim
2016-05-27 18:16 ` Shi, Yang
2016-05-30 6:11 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-01 20:40 ` Shi, Yang
2016-06-02 5:00 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-02 23:15 ` Shi, Yang
2016-05-30 5:39 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-30 6:08 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-01 20:52 ` Shi, Yang
2016-05-27 20:02 ` Andrew Morton
2016-05-27 20:17 ` Shi, Yang
2016-05-27 20:30 ` Andrew Morton
2016-05-24 10:08 ` [PATCH] mm: fix build problems from lookup_page_ext Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-24 16:33 ` Shi, Yang
2016-05-25 7:12 ` [PATCH] mm: check the return value of lookup_page_ext for all call sites shakil
2016-05-30 6:17 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160524025811.GA29094@bbox \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=yang.shi@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).