From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, oleg@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com,
vdavydov@parallels.com, mst@redhat.com, mhocko@suse.com,
mhocko@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] mm,oom_reaper: Make OOM reaper use list of mm_struct.
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 01:04:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201607080104.JDA41505.OtOFMSLOQVJFHF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201607080058.BFI87504.JtFOOFQFVHSLOM@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
>From acc85fdd36452e39bace6aa73b3aaa41bbe776a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 00:39:36 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] mm,oom_reaper: Make OOM reaper use list of mm_struct.
Since OOM reaping is per mm_struct operation, it is natural to use
list of mm_struct used by OOM victims. By using list of mm_struct,
we can eliminate find_lock_task_mm() usage from the OOM reaper.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
---
include/linux/oom.h | 8 -----
mm/memcontrol.c | 1 -
mm/oom_kill.c | 100 +++++++++++++++-------------------------------------
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
index bdcb331..cb3f041 100644
--- a/include/linux/oom.h
+++ b/include/linux/oom.h
@@ -72,14 +72,6 @@ static inline bool oom_task_origin(const struct task_struct *p)
extern void mark_oom_victim(struct task_struct *tsk);
-#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
-extern void wake_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk);
-#else
-static inline void wake_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-}
-#endif
-
extern unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p,
struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask,
unsigned long totalpages);
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 8f7a5b7..5043324 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1236,7 +1236,6 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
*/
if (task_will_free_mem(current)) {
mark_oom_victim(current);
- wake_oom_reaper(current);
goto unlock;
}
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 87e7ff3..223e1fe 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -471,8 +471,6 @@ bool process_shares_mm(struct task_struct *p, struct mm_struct *mm)
*/
static struct task_struct *oom_reaper_th;
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(oom_reaper_wait);
-static struct task_struct *oom_reaper_list;
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(oom_reaper_lock);
static bool __oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
{
@@ -543,30 +541,23 @@ static bool __oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
}
#define MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES 10
-static void oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static void oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
{
int attempts = 0;
- struct mm_struct *mm = NULL;
- struct task_struct *p = find_lock_task_mm(tsk);
/*
- * Make sure we find the associated mm_struct even when the particular
- * thread has already terminated and cleared its mm.
- * We might have race with exit path so consider our work done if there
- * is no mm.
+ * Check MMF_OOM_REAPED in case oom_kill_process() found this mm
+ * pinned.
*/
- if (!p)
- goto done;
- mm = p->mm;
- atomic_inc(&mm->mm_count);
- task_unlock(p);
+ if (test_bit(MMF_OOM_REAPED, &mm->flags))
+ return;
/* Retry the down_read_trylock(mmap_sem) a few times */
while (attempts++ < MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES && !__oom_reap_task(tsk, mm))
schedule_timeout_idle(HZ/10);
if (attempts <= MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES)
- goto done;
+ return;
/* Ignore this mm because somebody can't call up_write(mmap_sem). */
set_bit(MMF_OOM_REAPED, &mm->flags);
@@ -574,25 +565,6 @@ static void oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
pr_info("oom_reaper: unable to reap pid:%d (%s)\n",
task_pid_nr(tsk), tsk->comm);
debug_show_all_locks();
-
-done:
- /*
- * Clear TIF_MEMDIE because the task shouldn't be sitting on a
- * reasonably reclaimable memory anymore or it is not a good candidate
- * for the oom victim right now because it cannot release its memory
- * itself nor by the oom reaper.
- */
- tsk->oom_reaper_list = NULL;
- exit_oom_victim(tsk);
-
- /* Drop a reference taken by wake_oom_reaper */
- put_task_struct(tsk);
- /* Drop references taken by mark_oom_victim() */
- if (mm)
- exit_oom_mm(mm);
- /* Drop a reference taken above. */
- if (mm)
- mmdrop(mm);
}
static int oom_reaper(void *unused)
@@ -600,41 +572,31 @@ static int oom_reaper(void *unused)
set_freezable();
while (true) {
- struct task_struct *tsk = NULL;
-
- wait_event_freezable(oom_reaper_wait, oom_reaper_list != NULL);
- spin_lock(&oom_reaper_lock);
- if (oom_reaper_list != NULL) {
- tsk = oom_reaper_list;
- oom_reaper_list = tsk->oom_reaper_list;
- }
- spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock);
-
- if (tsk)
- oom_reap_task(tsk);
+ struct mm_struct *mm;
+ struct task_struct *victim;
+
+ wait_event_freezable(oom_reaper_wait,
+ !list_empty(&oom_mm_list));
+ mutex_lock(&oom_lock);
+ mm = list_first_entry(&oom_mm_list, struct mm_struct,
+ oom_mm.list);
+ victim = mm->oom_mm.victim;
+ /*
+ * Take a reference on current victim thread in case
+ * oom_reap_task() raced with mark_oom_victim() by
+ * other threads sharing this mm.
+ */
+ get_task_struct(victim);
+ mutex_unlock(&oom_lock);
+ oom_reap_task(victim, mm);
+ put_task_struct(victim);
+ /* Drop references taken by mark_oom_victim() */
+ exit_oom_mm(mm);
}
return 0;
}
-void wake_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- if (!oom_reaper_th)
- return;
-
- /* tsk is already queued? */
- if (tsk == oom_reaper_list || tsk->oom_reaper_list)
- return;
-
- get_task_struct(tsk);
-
- spin_lock(&oom_reaper_lock);
- tsk->oom_reaper_list = oom_reaper_list;
- oom_reaper_list = tsk;
- spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock);
- wake_up(&oom_reaper_wait);
-}
-
static int __init oom_init(void)
{
oom_reaper_th = kthread_run(oom_reaper, NULL, "oom_reaper");
@@ -682,6 +644,9 @@ void mark_oom_victim(struct task_struct *tsk)
if (!old_tsk) {
atomic_inc(&mm->mm_count);
list_add_tail(&mm->oom_mm.list, &oom_mm_list);
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
+ wake_up(&oom_reaper_wait);
+#endif
} else {
put_task_struct(old_tsk);
}
@@ -826,7 +791,6 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
unsigned int victim_points = 0;
static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(oom_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
- bool can_oom_reap = true;
/*
* If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
@@ -835,7 +799,6 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
task_lock(p);
if (task_will_free_mem(p)) {
mark_oom_victim(p);
- wake_oom_reaper(p);
task_unlock(p);
put_task_struct(p);
return;
@@ -925,7 +888,6 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
* memory might be still used. Hide the mm from the oom
* killer to guarantee OOM forward progress.
*/
- can_oom_reap = false;
set_bit(MMF_OOM_REAPED, &mm->flags);
pr_info("oom killer %d (%s) has mm pinned by %d (%s)\n",
task_pid_nr(victim), victim->comm,
@@ -936,9 +898,6 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
}
rcu_read_unlock();
- if (can_oom_reap)
- wake_oom_reaper(victim);
-
mmdrop(mm);
put_task_struct(victim);
}
@@ -1014,7 +973,6 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc)
*/
if (task_will_free_mem(current)) {
mark_oom_victim(current);
- wake_oom_reaper(current);
return true;
}
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-07 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-07 15:58 [PATCH v2 0/6] Change OOM killer to use list of mm_struct Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-07 16:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm,oom_reaper: Reduce find_lock_task_mm() usage Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-11 12:02 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-07 16:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm,oom_reaper: Do not attempt to reap a task twice Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-11 12:15 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-07 16:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm,oom: Use list of mm_struct used by OOM victims Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-11 12:50 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 6:00 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-12 7:09 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-07 16:04 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2016-07-11 13:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm,oom_reaper: Make OOM reaper use list of mm_struct Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 13:38 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-12 13:46 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 13:55 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 14:01 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-07 16:06 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm,oom: Remove OOM_SCAN_ABORT case and signal_struct->oom_victims Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-11 13:19 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-07 16:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm,oom: Stop clearing TIF_MEMDIE on remote thread Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-11 13:22 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201607080104.JDA41505.OtOFMSLOQVJFHF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).