From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f69.google.com (mail-wm0-f69.google.com [74.125.82.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127896B0263 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 06:46:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f69.google.com with SMTP id o80so12373687wme.1 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 03:46:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outbound-smtp07.blacknight.com (outbound-smtp07.blacknight.com. [46.22.139.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id xq13si95113wjb.276.2016.07.15.03.46.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Jul 2016 03:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.blacknight.com (pemlinmail05.blacknight.ie [81.17.254.26]) by outbound-smtp07.blacknight.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BB9F1C1A41 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:46:07 +0100 (IST) Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:46:05 +0100 From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/34] mm: rename NR_ANON_PAGES to NR_ANON_MAPPED Message-ID: <20160715104605.GO9806@techsingularity.net> References: <1467970510-21195-1-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net> <1467970510-21195-19-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net> <20160712145801.GJ5881@cmpxchg.org> <20160713085516.GI9806@techsingularity.net> <20160713130415.GB9905@cmpxchg.org> <20160713133701.GK9806@techsingularity.net> <20160713141343.244c108e48086055f57b1d79@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160713141343.244c108e48086055f57b1d79@linux-foundation.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Johannes Weiner , Linux-MM , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka , Minchan Kim , Joonsoo Kim , LKML On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:13:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:37:01 +0100 Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > I don't care strongly enough to cause a respin of half the series, and > > > it's not your problem that I waited until the last revision went into > > > mmots to review and comment. But if you agreed to a revert, would you > > > consider tacking on a revert patch at the end of the series? > > > > > > > In this case, I'm going to ask the other people on the cc for a > > tie-breaker. If someone else prefers the old names then I'm happy for > > your patch to be applied on top with my ack instead of respinning the > > whole series. > > > > Anyone for a tie breaker? > > I am aggressively undecided. I guess as it's a bit of a 51/49 > situation, the "stay with what people are familiar with" benefit tips the > balance toward the legacy names? > I still can't decide. It's currently still a draw in terms of naming. If you're worried, use the old naming. It wouldn't be the first time I thought a name was odd. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org