From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Received: from mail-pf0-f197.google.com (mail-pf0-f197.google.com [209.85.192.197])
	by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CFB828E4
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 18:35:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-f197.google.com with SMTP id p64so243781035pfb.0
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id oy8si2083687pac.126.2016.07.15.15.35.55
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:35:54 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/34] mm: rename NR_ANON_PAGES to NR_ANON_MAPPED
Message-Id: <20160715153554.f9d12360e31441b720d6a6b1@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160715104605.GO9806@techsingularity.net>
References: <1467970510-21195-1-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
	<1467970510-21195-19-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
	<20160712145801.GJ5881@cmpxchg.org>
	<20160713085516.GI9806@techsingularity.net>
	<20160713130415.GB9905@cmpxchg.org>
	<20160713133701.GK9806@techsingularity.net>
	<20160713141343.244c108e48086055f57b1d79@linux-foundation.org>
	<20160715104605.GO9806@techsingularity.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:46:05 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:13:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:37:01 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > > I don't care strongly enough to cause a respin of half the series, and
> > > > it's not your problem that I waited until the last revision went into
> > > > mmots to review and comment. But if you agreed to a revert, would you
> > > > consider tacking on a revert patch at the end of the series?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > In this case, I'm going to ask the other people on the cc for a
> > > tie-breaker. If someone else prefers the old names then I'm happy for
> > > your patch to be applied on top with my ack instead of respinning the
> > > whole series.
> > > 
> > > Anyone for a tie breaker?
> > 
> > I am aggressively undecided.  I guess as it's a bit of a 51/49
> > situation, the "stay with what people are familiar with" benefit tips the
> > balance toward the legacy names?
> > 
> 
> I still can't decide. It's currently still a draw in terms of naming. If
> you're worried, use the old naming. It wouldn't be the first time I
> thought a name was odd.

Well I dunno.  We can leave the series as-is for now and we can merge
the rename-it-back patch sometime during the next -rc cycle if we find
that people are running around in confusion and tumbling out of high
windows.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>