From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f69.google.com (mail-wm0-f69.google.com [74.125.82.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FBA6B0262 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 07:23:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f69.google.com with SMTP id r190so56000710wmr.0 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vw3si596491wjc.223.2016.07.18.04.23.10 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:23:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Vlastimil Babka Subject: [PATCH 3/8] mm, page_alloc: don't retry initial attempt in slowpath Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:22:57 +0200 Message-Id: <20160718112302.27381-4-vbabka@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20160718112302.27381-1-vbabka@suse.cz> References: <20160718112302.27381-1-vbabka@suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko , Mel Gorman , Joonsoo Kim , David Rientjes , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka After __alloc_pages_slowpath() sets up new alloc_flags and wakes up kswapd, it first tries get_page_from_freelist() with the new alloc_flags, as it may succeed e.g. due to using min watermark instead of low watermark. It makes sense to to do this attempt before adjusting zonelist based on alloc_flags/gfp_mask, as it's still relatively a fast path if we just wake up kswapd and successfully allocate. This patch therefore moves the initial attempt above the retry label and reorganizes a bit the part below the retry label. We still have to attempt get_page_from_freelist() on each retry, as some allocations cannot do that as part of direct reclaim or compaction, and yet are not allowed to fail (even though they do a WARN_ON_ONCE() and thus should not exist). We can reuse the call meant for ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS attempt and just set alloc_flags to ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS if the context allows it. As a side-effect, the attempts from direct reclaim/compaction will also no longer obey watermarks once this is set, but there's little harm in that. Kswapd wakeups are also done on each retry to be safe from potential races resulting in kswapd going to sleep while a process (that may not be able to reclaim by itself) is still looping. Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka --- mm/page_alloc.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index eb1968a1041e..30443804f156 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -3541,35 +3541,42 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, */ alloc_flags = gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_mask); + if (gfp_mask & __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM) + wake_all_kswapds(order, ac); + + /* + * The adjusted alloc_flags might result in immediate success, so try + * that first + */ + page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac); + if (page) + goto got_pg; + + retry: + /* Ensure kswapd doesn't accidentally go to sleep as long as we loop */ if (gfp_mask & __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM) wake_all_kswapds(order, ac); + if (gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(gfp_mask)) + alloc_flags = ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS; + /* * Reset the zonelist iterators if memory policies can be ignored. * These allocations are high priority and system rather than user * orientated. */ - if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CPUSET) || gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(gfp_mask)) { + if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CPUSET) || (alloc_flags & ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS)) { ac->zonelist = node_zonelist(numa_node_id(), gfp_mask); ac->preferred_zoneref = first_zones_zonelist(ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask); } - /* This is the last chance, in general, before the goto nopage. */ + /* Attempt with potentially adjusted zonelist and alloc_flags */ page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac); if (page) goto got_pg; - /* Allocate without watermarks if the context allows */ - if (gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(gfp_mask)) { - - page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, order, - ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS, ac); - if (page) - goto got_pg; - } - /* Caller is not willing to reclaim, we can't balance anything */ if (!can_direct_reclaim) { /* -- 2.9.0 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org