From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f198.google.com (mail-pf0-f198.google.com [209.85.192.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3506B0005 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:44:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f198.google.com with SMTP id h186so250274992pfg.3 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wv6si17321148pab.263.2016.07.22.12.44.50 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:44:48 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mempool: do not consume memory reserves from the reclaim path Message-Id: <20160722124448.ad6f9b8be8fe1552b076096c@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <15177f2d-cd00-dade-fc25-12a0c241e8f5@suse.cz> References: <1468831164-26621-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> <1468831285-27242-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> <20160719135426.GA31229@cmpxchg.org> <20160720081541.GF11249@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160721085202.GC26379@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160721121300.GA21806@cmpxchg.org> <20160721145309.GR26379@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160722063720.GB794@dhcp22.suse.cz> <15177f2d-cd00-dade-fc25-12a0c241e8f5@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , David Rientjes , linux-mm@kvack.org, Mikulas Patocka , Ondrej Kozina , Tetsuo Handa , Mel Gorman , Neil Brown , LKML , dm-devel@redhat.com On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:26:19 +0200 Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 07/22/2016 08:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 21-07-16 16:53:09, Michal Hocko wrote: > >> From d64815758c212643cc1750774e2751721685059a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: Michal Hocko > >> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:40:59 +0200 > >> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "mm, mempool: only set __GFP_NOMEMALLOC if there are > >> free elements" > >> > >> This reverts commit f9054c70d28bc214b2857cf8db8269f4f45a5e23. > > > > I've noticed that Andrew has already picked this one up. Is anybody > > against marking it for stable? > > It would be strange to have different behavior with known regression in > 4.6 and 4.7 stables. Actually, there's still time for 4.7 proper? > I added the cc:stable. Do we need to bust a gut to rush it into 4.7? It sounds safer to let it bake for a while, fix it in 4.7.1? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org