linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	greg@suse.cz, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
	Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>,
	Ralf-Peter Rohbeck <Ralf-Peter.Rohbeck@quantum.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>, Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: OOM detection regressions since 4.7
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:32:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160822093249.GA14916@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)

Hi, 
there have been multiple reports [1][2][3][4][5] about pre-mature OOM
killer invocations since 4.7 which contains oom detection rework. All of
them were for order-2 (kernel stack) alloaction requests failing because
of a high fragmentation and compaction failing to make any forward
progress. While investigating this we have found out that the compaction
just gives up too early. Vlastimil has been working on compaction
improvement for quite some time and his series [6] is already sitting
in mmotm tree. This already helps a lot because it drops some heuristics
which are more aimed at lower latencies for high orders rather than
reliability. Joonsoo has then identified further problem with too many
blocks being marked as unmovable [7] and Vlastimil has prepared a patch
on top of his series [8] which is also in the mmotm tree now.

That being said, the regression is real and should be fixed for 4.7
stable users. [6][8] was reported to help and ooms are no longer
reproducible. I know we are quite late (rc3) in 4.8 but I would vote
for mergeing those patches and have them in 4.8. For 4.7 I would go
with a partial revert of the detection rework for high order requests
(see patch below). This patch is really trivial. If those compaction
improvements are just too large for 4.8 then we can use the same patch
as for 4.7 stable for now and revert it in 4.9 after compaction changes
are merged.

Thoughts?

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160731051121.GB307@x4
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201608120901.41463.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com
[3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160801192620.GD31957@dhcp22.suse.cz
[4] https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-kernel/2016-08/msg00021.html
[5] https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=994066
[6] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160810091226.6709-1-vbabka@suse.cz
[7] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160816031222.GC16913@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE
[8] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/f7a9ea9d-bb88-bfd6-e340-3a933559305a@suse.cz

---

             reply	other threads:[~2016-08-22  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-22  9:32 Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-08-22  9:37 ` OOM detection regressions since 4.7 Michal Hocko
2016-08-22 10:05   ` Greg KH
2016-08-22 10:54     ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-22 13:31       ` Greg KH
2016-08-22 13:42         ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-22 14:02           ` Greg KH
2016-08-22 22:05           ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-23  7:43             ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-25  7:11               ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-25  7:17                 ` Olaf Hering
2016-08-29 14:52                   ` Olaf Hering
2016-08-29 14:54                     ` Olaf Hering
2016-08-29 15:07                     ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-29 15:59                       ` Olaf Hering
2016-08-29 17:28                     ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-29 17:52                       ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-28  5:50                 ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2016-08-25 20:30               ` Ralf-Peter Rohbeck
2016-08-26  6:26                 ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-26 20:17                   ` Ralf-Peter Rohbeck
2016-08-22 10:16 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2016-08-22 10:56   ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-22 11:01     ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2016-08-22 11:13       ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-22 11:20         ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2016-08-23  4:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-08-23  7:33   ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-23  7:40     ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2016-08-23  7:48       ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-23 19:08     ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-24  6:32       ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-24  5:01     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-08-24  7:04       ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-24  7:29         ` Joonsoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160822093249.GA14916@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=Ralf-Peter.Rohbeck@quantum.com \
    --cc=a.miskiewicz@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=greg@suse.cz \
    --cc=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
    --cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).