From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] treewide: use kv[mz]alloc* rather than opencoded variants
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 09:49:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170114084912.GB9962@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0b2f24d-a5e1-5ac7-ccba-347e0f17fd62@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On Sat 14-01-17 12:01:50, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2017/01/13 2:29, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Ilya has noticed that I've screwed up some k[zc]alloc conversions and
> > didn't use the kvzalloc. This is an updated patch with some acks
> > collected on the way
> > ---
> > From a7b89c6d0a3c685045e37740c8f97b065f37e0a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:30:32 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] treewide: use kv[mz]alloc* rather than opencoded variants
> >
> > There are many code paths opencoding kvmalloc. Let's use the helper
> > instead. The main difference to kvmalloc is that those users are usually
> > not considering all the aspects of the memory allocator. E.g. allocation
> > requests < 64kB are basically never failing and invoke OOM killer to
>
> Isn't this "requests <= 32kB" because allocation requests for 33kB will be
> rounded up to 64kB?
Yes
> Same for "smaller than 64kB" in PATCH 6/6. But strictly speaking, isn't
> it bogus to refer actual size because PAGE_SIZE is not always 4096?
This is just an example and I didn't want to pull
PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER here. So I've instead fixed the wording to:
"
E.g. allocation requests <= 32kB (with 4kB pages) are basically never
failing and invoke OOM killer to satisfy the allocation.
"
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-14 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-12 15:37 [PATCH 0/6 v3] kvmalloc Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:37 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers Michal Hocko
2017-01-16 4:34 ` John Hubbard
2017-01-16 8:47 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16 19:09 ` John Hubbard
2017-01-16 19:40 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16 21:15 ` John Hubbard
2017-01-16 21:48 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16 21:57 ` John Hubbard
2017-01-17 7:51 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-18 5:59 ` John Hubbard
2017-01-18 8:21 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-19 8:37 ` John Hubbard
2017-01-19 8:45 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-19 9:09 ` John Hubbard
2017-01-19 9:56 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-19 21:28 ` John Hubbard
2017-01-26 12:09 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-30 8:42 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-12 15:37 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: support __GFP_REPEAT in kvmalloc_node for >=64kB Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 16:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-14 2:42 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-14 8:45 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-24 15:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-12 15:37 ` [PATCH 3/6] rhashtable: simplify a strange allocation pattern Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:37 ` [PATCH 4/6] ila: " Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:37 ` [PATCH 5/6] treewide: use kv[mz]alloc* rather than opencoded variants Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:57 ` David Sterba
2017-01-12 16:05 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-01-12 16:54 ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-01-12 17:18 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 17:00 ` Dan Williams
2017-01-12 17:26 ` Kees Cook
2017-01-12 17:37 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-20 13:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-24 15:00 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 11:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-25 13:09 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 13:40 ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-01-12 17:29 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-14 3:01 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-14 8:49 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-01-12 20:14 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-13 1:11 ` Dilger, Andreas
2017-01-14 10:56 ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-01-16 7:33 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16 8:28 ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-01-16 8:18 ` Tariq Toukan
2017-01-12 15:37 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] net: use kvmalloc with __GFP_REPEAT rather than open coded variant Michal Hocko
2017-01-24 15:17 ` [PATCH 0/6 v3] kvmalloc Michal Hocko
2017-01-24 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-25 13:10 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-24 19:17 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-01-25 13:10 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 13:21 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170114084912.GB9962@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).