From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f199.google.com (mail-wr0-f199.google.com [209.85.128.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2589728089F for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 08:59:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wr0-f199.google.com with SMTP id u48so65534499wrc.0 for ; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:59:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g16si5793840wmg.45.2017.03.06.05.59.51 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:59:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:59:48 +0100 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: do not call mem_cgroup_free() from within mem_cgroup_alloc() Message-ID: <20170306135947.GF27953@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20170304025356.12265-1-tahsin@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170304025356.12265-1-tahsin@google.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Tahsin Erdogan Cc: Johannes Weiner , Vladimir Davydov , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 03-03-17 18:53:56, Tahsin Erdogan wrote: > mem_cgroup_free() indirectly calls wb_domain_exit() which is not > prepared to deal with a struct wb_domain object that hasn't executed > wb_domain_init(). For instance, the following warning message is > printed by lockdep if alloc_percpu() fails in mem_cgroup_alloc(): > > INFO: trying to register non-static key. > the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. > turning off the locking correctness validator. > CPU: 1 PID: 1950 Comm: mkdir Not tainted 4.10.0+ #151 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > Call Trace: > dump_stack+0x67/0x99 > register_lock_class+0x36d/0x540 > __lock_acquire+0x7f/0x1a30 > ? irq_work_queue+0x73/0x90 > ? wake_up_klogd+0x36/0x40 > ? console_unlock+0x45d/0x540 > ? vprintk_emit+0x211/0x2e0 > lock_acquire+0xcc/0x200 > ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x60/0x60 > del_timer_sync+0x3c/0xc0 > ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x60/0x60 > wb_domain_exit+0x14/0x20 > mem_cgroup_free+0x14/0x40 > mem_cgroup_css_alloc+0x3f9/0x620 > cgroup_apply_control_enable+0x190/0x390 > cgroup_mkdir+0x290/0x3d0 > kernfs_iop_mkdir+0x58/0x80 > vfs_mkdir+0x10e/0x1a0 > SyS_mkdirat+0xa8/0xd0 > SyS_mkdir+0x14/0x20 > entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad > > Fix mem_cgroup_alloc() by doing more granular clean up in case of > failures. > > Fixes: 0b8f73e104285 ("mm: memcontrol: clean up alloc, online, offline, free functions") > Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan Please do not duplicate mem_cgroup_free code and rather add __mem_cgroup_free which does everything except for wb_domain_exit. An alternative would be to teach memcg_wb_domain_exit to not call wb_domain_exit if it hasn't been initialized yet. The first option seems easier. Thanks! > --- > mm/memcontrol.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > index c52ec893e241..9a9d5630df91 100644 > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > @@ -4194,9 +4194,12 @@ static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_alloc(void) > idr_replace(&mem_cgroup_idr, memcg, memcg->id.id); > return memcg; > fail: > + for_each_node(node) > + free_mem_cgroup_per_node_info(memcg, node); > + free_percpu(memcg->stat); > if (memcg->id.id > 0) > idr_remove(&mem_cgroup_idr, memcg->id.id); > - mem_cgroup_free(memcg); > + kfree(memcg); > return NULL; > } > > -- > 2.12.0.rc1.440.g5b76565f74-goog > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: email@kvack.org -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org