From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
qiuxishi@huawei.com, Kani Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
slaoub@gmail.com, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, memory_hotplug: fix MMOP_ONLINE_KEEP behavior
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 14:40:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170601124022.GC9091@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad200307-63d1-fe6f-cbc6-09c8cb431b8a@suse.cz>
On Thu 01-06-17 14:32:42, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 06/01/2017 10:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> >
> > Heiko Carstens has noticed that the MMOP_ONLINE_KEEP is broken currently
> > $ grep . memory3?/valid_zones
> > memory34/valid_zones:Normal Movable
> > memory35/valid_zones:Normal Movable
> > memory36/valid_zones:Normal Movable
> > memory37/valid_zones:Normal Movable
> >
> > $ echo online_movable > memory34/state
> > $ grep . memory3?/valid_zones
> > memory34/valid_zones:Movable
> > memory35/valid_zones:Movable
> > memory36/valid_zones:Movable
> > memory37/valid_zones:Movable
> >
> > $ echo online > memory36/state
> > $ grep . memory3?/valid_zones
> > memory34/valid_zones:Movable
> > memory36/valid_zones:Normal
> > memory37/valid_zones:Movable
> >
> > so we have effectivelly punched a hole into the movable zone. The
> > problem is that move_pfn_range() check for MMOP_ONLINE_KEEP is wrong.
> > It only checks whether the given range is already part of the movable
> > zone which is not the case here as only memory34 is in the zone. Fix
> > this by using allow_online_pfn_range(..., MMOP_ONLINE_KERNEL) if that
> > is false then we can be sure that movable onlining is the right thing to
> > do.
> >
> > Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> > Tested-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> > Fixes: "mm, memory_hotplug: do not associate hotadded memory to zones until online"
>
> Just fold it there before sending to Linus, right?
I do not have a strong preference. The changelog could still be helpful
for reference. The original patch is quite large and details like this
are likely to get lost there.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Thanks!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-01 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-01 8:37 [PATCH 0/2] memory hotplug follow up fixes Michal Hocko
2017-06-01 8:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, memory_hotplug: fix MMOP_ONLINE_KEEP behavior Michal Hocko
2017-06-01 12:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-06-01 12:40 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-06-01 8:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm, memory_hotplug: do not assume ZONE_NORMAL is default kernel zone Michal Hocko
2017-06-01 12:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-06-22 2:32 ` Wei Yang
2017-06-22 18:16 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-23 1:37 ` Wei Yang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-31 6:24 [-next] memory hotplug regression Michal Hocko
2017-05-31 6:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, memory_hotplug: fix MMOP_ONLINE_KEEP behavior Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170601124022.GC9091@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).