linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
To: keescook@chromium.org, mhocko@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org
Cc: penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com,
	sds@tycho.nsa.gov, casey@schaufler-ca.com, hch@infradead.org,
	labbott@redhat.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 0/3] mm: LSM: ro protection for dynamic data
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 20:33:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170627173323.11287-1-igor.stoppa@huawei.com> (raw)

Hi,
please consider this patch-set for inclusion.

This patch-set introduces the possibility of protecting memory that has
been allocated dynamically.

The memory is managed in pools: when a pool is made R/O, all the memory
that is part of it, will become R/O.

A R/O pool can be destroyed, to recover its memory, but it cannot be
turned back into R/W mode.

This is intentional. This feature is meant for data that doesn't need
further modifications after initialization.

An example is provided, showing how to turn into a boot-time option the
writable state of the security hooks.
Prior to this patch, it was a compile-time option.

This is made possible, thanks to Tetsuo Handa's rework of the hooks
structure (included in the patchset).

Changes since the v6 version:
- complete rewrite, using the genalloc lib (suggested by Laura Abbott)
- added sysfs interface for tracking of active pools

Changes since the v7 version:
- replaced the use of devices with kobjects for showing info on sysfs


The only question still open is if there should be a possibility for
unprotecting a memory pool in other cases than destruction.

The only cases found for this topic are:
- protecting the LSM header structure between creation and insertion of a
  security module that was not built as part of the kernel
  (but the module can protect the headers after it has loaded)

- unloading SELinux from RedHat, if the system has booted, but no policy
  has been loaded yet - this feature is going away, according to Casey.


Note:

The patch is larg-ish, but I was not sure what criteria to use for
splitting it.
If it helps the reviewing, please do let me know how I should split it
and I will comply.



Igor Stoppa (2):
  Protectable memory support
  Make LSM Writable Hooks a command line option

Tetsuo Handa (1):
  LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct
    list_head

 arch/Kconfig                   |   1 +
 include/linux/lsm_hooks.h      | 420 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 include/linux/page-flags.h     |   2 +
 include/linux/pmalloc.h        | 111 +++++++++++
 include/trace/events/mmflags.h |   1 +
 init/main.c                    |   2 +
 lib/Kconfig                    |   1 +
 lib/genalloc.c                 |   4 +-
 mm/Makefile                    |   1 +
 mm/pmalloc.c                   | 341 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/usercopy.c                  |  24 ++-
 security/security.c            |  49 +++--
 12 files changed, 721 insertions(+), 236 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/linux/pmalloc.h
 create mode 100644 mm/pmalloc.c

-- 
2.9.3

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2017-06-27 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-27 17:33 Igor Stoppa [this message]
2017-06-27 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] Protectable memory support Igor Stoppa
2017-06-27 17:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head Igor Stoppa
2017-06-27 17:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] Make LSM Writable Hooks a command line option Igor Stoppa
2017-06-27 17:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-27 20:07     ` igor.stoppa
2017-06-28  8:25     ` Igor Stoppa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170627173323.11287-1-igor.stoppa@huawei.com \
    --to=igor.stoppa@huawei.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).