From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f200.google.com (mail-qk0-f200.google.com [209.85.220.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C5C6B0292 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 11:02:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qk0-f200.google.com with SMTP id k14so25741909qkl.11 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 08:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q49si2209849qte.104.2017.06.28.08.02.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 08:02:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:01:58 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v11 6/6] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CMD_VQ Message-ID: <20170628175956-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1497004901-30593-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <1497004901-30593-7-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <20170620190343-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <5949E7C0.3050106@intel.com> <20170621151922-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <594B8287.6000706@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <594B8287.6000706@intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Wei Wang Cc: "virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "david@redhat.com" , "Hansen, Dave" , "cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "mgorman@techsingularity.net" , "aarcange@redhat.com" , "amit.shah@redhat.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "liliang.opensource@gmail.com" , "riel@redhat.com" , "nilal@redhat.com" On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:40:39PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > On 06/21/2017 08:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:28:00AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > On 06/21/2017 12:18 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 06:41:41PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > > > - if (!virtqueue_indirect_desc_table_add(vq, desc, num)) { > > > > > + if (!virtqueue_indirect_desc_table_add(vq, desc, *num)) { > > > > > virtqueue_kick(vq); > > > > > - wait_event(vb->acked, virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len)); > > > > > - vb->balloon_page_chunk.chunk_num = 0; > > > > > + if (busy_wait) > > > > > + while (!virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len) && > > > > > + !virtqueue_is_broken(vq)) > > > > > + cpu_relax(); > > > > > + else > > > > > + wait_event(vb->acked, virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len)); > > > > This is something I didn't previously notice. > > > > As you always keep a single buffer in flight, you do not > > > > really need indirect at all. Just add all descriptors > > > > in the ring directly, then kick. > > > > > > > > E.g. > > > > virtqueue_add_first > > > > virtqueue_add_next > > > > virtqueue_add_last > > > > > > > > ? > > > > > > > > You also want a flag to avoid allocations but there's no need to do it > > > > per descriptor, set it on vq. > > > > > > > Without using the indirect table, I'm thinking about changing to use > > > the standard sg (i.e. struct scatterlist), instead of vring_desc, so that > > > we don't need to modify or add any new functions of virtqueue_add(). > > > > > > In this case, we will kmalloc an array of sgs in probe(), and we can add > > > the sgs one by one to the vq, which won't trigger the allocation of an > > > indirect table inside virtqueue_add(), and then kick when all are added. > > > > > > Best, > > > Wei > > And allocate headers too? This can work. API extensions aren't > > necessarily a bad idea though. The API I suggest above is preferable > > for the simple reason that it can work without INDIRECT flag > > support in hypervisor. > > OK, probably we don't need to add a desc to the vq - we can just use > the vq's desc, like this: > > int virtqueue_add_first(struct virtqueue *_vq, > uint64_t addr, > uint32_t len, > bool in, > unsigned int *idx) { > > ... > uint16_t desc_flags = in ? VRING_DESC_F_NEXT | VRING_DESC_F_WRITE : > VRING_DESC_F_NEXT; > > vq->vring.desc[vq->free_head].addr = addr; > vq->vring.desc[vq->free_head].len = len; > vq->vring.desc[vq->free_head].flags = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, flags); > /* return to the caller the desc id */ > *idx = vq->free_head; > ... > } > > int virtqueue_add_next(struct virtqueue *_vq, > uint64_t addr, > uint32_t len, > bool in, > bool end, > unsigned int *idx) { > ... > vq->vring.desc[*idx].next = vq->free_head; > vq->vring.desc[vq->free_head].addr = addr; > ... > if (end) > remove the VRING_DESC_F_NEXT flag > } > Add I would say add-last. > > What do you think? We can also combine the two functions into one. > > > > Best, > Wei With an enum? Yes that's also an option. -- MST -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org