Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] mm: add vm_insert_mixed_mkwrite()

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] mm: add vm_insert_mixed_mkwrite()
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:16:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170719141659.GB15908@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170628220152.28161-2-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>

On Wed 28-06-17 16:01:48, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> To be able to use the common 4k zero page in DAX we need to have our PTE
> fault path look more like our PMD fault path where a PTE entry can be
> marked as dirty and writeable as it is first inserted, rather than waiting
> for a follow-up dax_pfn_mkwrite() => finish_mkwrite_fault() call.
> 
> Right now we can rely on having a dax_pfn_mkwrite() call because we can
> distinguish between these two cases in do_wp_page():
> 
> 	case 1: 4k zero page => writable DAX storage
> 	case 2: read-only DAX storage => writeable DAX storage
> 
> This distinction is made by via vm_normal_page().  vm_normal_page() returns
> false for the common 4k zero page, though, just as it does for DAX ptes.
> Instead of special casing the DAX + 4k zero page case, we will simplify our
> DAX PTE page fault sequence so that it matches our DAX PMD sequence, and
> get rid of dax_pfn_mkwrite() completely.
> 
> This means that insert_pfn() needs to follow the lead of insert_pfn_pmd()
> and allow us to pass in a 'mkwrite' flag.  If 'mkwrite' is set insert_pfn()
> will do the work that was previously done by wp_page_reuse() as part of the
> dax_pfn_mkwrite() call path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>

Just one small comment below.

> @@ -1658,14 +1658,26 @@ static int insert_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>  	if (!pte)
>  		goto out;
>  	retval = -EBUSY;
> -	if (!pte_none(*pte))
> -		goto out_unlock;
> +	if (!pte_none(*pte)) {
> +		if (mkwrite) {
> +			entry = *pte;
> +			goto out_mkwrite;

Can we maybe check here that (pte_pfn(*pte) == pfn_t_to_pfn(pfn)) and
return -EBUSY otherwise? That way we are sure insert_pfn() isn't doing
anything we don't expect and if I understand the code right, we need to
invalidate all zero page mappings at given file offset (via
unmap_mapping_range()) before mapping an allocated block there and thus the
case of filling the hole won't be affected by this?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>