From: Andrew Morton <email@example.com>
Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
Josef Bacik <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: use sc->priority for slab shrink targets
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:53:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw)
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:45:30 -0400 firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> From: Josef Bacik <email@example.com>
> Previously we were using the ratio of the number of lru pages scanned to
> the number of eligible lru pages to determine the number of slab objects
> to scan. The problem with this is that these two things have nothing to
> do with each other,
> so in slab heavy work loads where there is little to
> no page cache we can end up with the pages scanned being a very low
In this case the "number of eligible lru pages" will also be low, so
these things do have something to do with each other?
> This means that we reclaim next to no slab pages and waste a
> lot of time reclaiming small amounts of space.
> Instead use sc->priority in the same way we use it to determine scan
> amounts for the lru's.
That sounds like a good idea.
Alternatively did you consider hooking into the vmpressure code (or
hannes's new memdelay code) to determine how hard to scan slab?
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to firstname.lastname@example.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"email@example.com"> firstname.lastname@example.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-28 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-20 18:45 [PATCH 0/2][V3] slab and general reclaim improvements josef
2017-07-20 18:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: use sc->priority for slab shrink targets josef
2017-07-27 23:53 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2017-07-28 23:52 ` Josef Bacik
2017-07-20 18:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: make kswapd try harder to keep active pages in cache josef
2017-07-27 23:55 ` [PATCH 0/2][V3] slab and general reclaim improvements Andrew Morton
2017-08-22 19:35 [PATCH 1/2] mm: use sc->priority for slab shrink targets josef
2017-08-24 7:08 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-24 14:29 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-08-24 14:49 ` Josef Bacik
2017-08-24 22:15 ` Dave Chinner
2017-08-24 22:45 ` Josef Bacik
2017-08-25 1:40 ` Dave Chinner
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).