linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/sched: memdelay: memory health interface for systems and workloads
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 11:10:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170729091055.GA6524@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170727153010.23347-4-hannes@cmpxchg.org>

So no, this doesn't have a change in hell of making it.

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:30:10AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> +static void domain_cpu_update(struct memdelay_domain *md, int cpu,
> +			      int old, int new)
> +{
> +	enum memdelay_domain_state state;
> +	struct memdelay_domain_cpu *mdc;
> +	unsigned long now, delta;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	mdc = per_cpu_ptr(md->mdcs, cpu);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&mdc->lock, flags);

Afaict this is inside scheduler locks, this cannot be a spinlock. Also,
do we really want to add more atomics there?

> +	if (old) {
> +		WARN_ONCE(!mdc->tasks[old], "cpu=%d old=%d new=%d counter=%d\n",
> +			  cpu, old, new, mdc->tasks[old]);
> +		mdc->tasks[old] -= 1;
> +	}
> +	if (new)
> +		mdc->tasks[new] += 1;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The domain is somewhat delayed when a number of tasks are
> +	 * delayed but there are still others running the workload.
> +	 *
> +	 * The domain is fully delayed when all non-idle tasks on the
> +	 * CPU are delayed, or when a delayed task is actively running
> +	 * and preventing productive tasks from making headway.
> +	 *
> +	 * The state times then add up over all CPUs in the domain: if
> +	 * the domain is fully blocked on one CPU and there is another
> +	 * one running the workload, the domain is considered fully
> +	 * blocked 50% of the time.
> +	 */
> +	if (!mdc->tasks[MTS_DELAYED_ACTIVE] && !mdc->tasks[MTS_DELAYED])
> +		state = MDS_NONE;
> +	else if (mdc->tasks[MTS_WORKING])
> +		state = MDS_SOME;
> +	else
> +		state = MDS_FULL;
> +
> +	if (mdc->state == state)
> +		goto unlock;
> +
> +	now = ktime_to_ns(ktime_get());

ktime_get_ns(), also no ktime in scheduler code.

> +	delta = now - mdc->state_start;
> +
> +	domain_move_clock(md);
> +	md->times[mdc->state] += delta;
> +
> +	mdc->state = state;
> +	mdc->state_start = now;
> +unlock:
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mdc->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static struct memdelay_domain *memcg_domain(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> +	if (!mem_cgroup_disabled())
> +		return memcg->memdelay_domain;
> +#endif
> +	return &memdelay_global_domain;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * memdelay_task_change - note a task changing its delay/work state
> + * @task: the task changing state
> + * @delayed: 1 when task enters delayed state, -1 when it leaves
> + * @working: 1 when task enters working state, -1 when it leaves
> + * @active_delay: 1 when task enters active delay, -1 when it leaves
> + *
> + * Updates the task's domain counters to reflect a change in the
> + * task's delayed/working state.
> + */
> +void memdelay_task_change(struct task_struct *task, int old, int new)
> +{
> +	int cpu = task_cpu(task);
> +	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> +	unsigned long delay = 0;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> +	WARN_ONCE(task->memdelay_state != old,
> +		  "cpu=%d task=%p state=%d (in_iowait=%d PF_MEMDELAYED=%d) old=%d new=%d\n",
> +		  cpu, task, task->memdelay_state, task->in_iowait,
> +		  !!(task->flags & PF_MEMDELAY), old, new);
> +	task->memdelay_state = new;
> +#endif
> +
> +	/* Account when tasks are entering and leaving delays */
> +	if (old < MTS_DELAYED && new >= MTS_DELAYED) {
> +		task->memdelay_start = ktime_to_ms(ktime_get());
> +	} else if (old >= MTS_DELAYED && new < MTS_DELAYED) {
> +		delay = ktime_to_ms(ktime_get()) - task->memdelay_start;
> +		task->memdelay_total += delay;
> +	}

Scheduler stuff will _NOT_ user ktime_get() and will _NOT_ do pointless
divisions into ms.

> +
> +	/* Account domain state changes */
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(task);
> +	do {
> +		struct memdelay_domain *md;
> +
> +		md = memcg_domain(memcg);
> +		md->aggregate += delay;
> +		domain_cpu_update(md, cpu, old, new);
> +	} while (memcg && (memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)));
> +	rcu_read_unlock();

We are _NOT_ going to do a 3rd cgroup iteration for every task action.

> +};

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-29  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-27 15:30 [PATCH 0/3] memdelay: memory health metric for systems and workloads Johannes Weiner
2017-07-27 15:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/loadavg: consolidate LOAD_INT, LOAD_FRAC macros Johannes Weiner
2017-07-27 15:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: workingset: tell cache transitions from workingset thrashing Johannes Weiner
2017-07-27 15:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/sched: memdelay: memory health interface for systems and workloads Johannes Weiner
2017-07-27 15:56   ` Johannes Weiner
2017-07-29  9:10   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-07-30 15:28     ` Johannes Weiner
2017-07-31  8:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-31 18:41         ` Johannes Weiner
2017-07-31 19:49           ` Mike Galbraith
2017-07-31 20:38             ` Johannes Weiner
2017-08-01  2:23               ` Mike Galbraith
2017-08-01  7:57           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 12:26             ` Johannes Weiner
2017-08-13 14:52               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-29 13:31   ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-27 20:43 ` [PATCH 0/3] memdelay: memory health metric " Andrew Morton
2017-07-28 19:43   ` Johannes Weiner
2017-08-02  8:11     ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-29  2:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-07-29  3:21   ` Mike Galbraith
2017-07-29  6:38   ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170729091055.GA6524@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).